“Hello, this is XXX, coming to you live from Taipei. We are going to broadcast a three-party talk live around half past 12. We are currently doing some technical tests, so please stand by ...”
These familiar opening lines did not come from a TV program or a full-time reporter, but from the student demonstrators at Liberty Square in Taipei, who transmitted information to everyone with Internet access. Not only is this a historical change for Taiwan’s student movements, it is also challenging the prejudice and distortions of mainstream media in reporting dissenting opinion.
It is not an overstatement to view the demonstration as a “high-tech student movement.”
At the beginning, between 400 and 500 students were mobilized overnight using the Internet to a rally staged in front of the Executive Yuan, where the students expressed their dissatisfaction with alleged police brutality during the recent visit by Association for Relations Across the Taiwan Strait Chairman Chen Yunlin (陳雲林) and the Assembly and Parade Law (集會遊行法) that is said to have violated the protesters’ freedom of speech. While reporters were still covering anti-Chen demonstrations at the Grand Hotel and Grand Formosa Regent Taipei where a massive police presence was stationed, students had already sent out messages about their sit-in protests on the Internet.
After being moved from the Executive Yuan by police, students regrouped at Liberty Square to protest. It was amazing that in addition to rain shelters and generators, tables and chairs, four to five computers were set up in a row at the venue. The young generation is not only familiar with Internet technology, but also able to broadcast news live in Chinese, English and Japanese and send information thousands of kilometers away. The 24-hour live broadcast became a live, uncut reality show of the student’s demands.
They told the public: “Whatever mainstream media outlets cannot or are not willing to do, we will do by ourselves. We will be our own media.”
High-tech social movements initiated on the Internet have existed for a while. The Internet allows non-government organizations and local communities to effectively form alliances across borders. In particular, when an issue comes up, the Internet can help further discussion and communication between organizations, or even mobilize people with a particular position in an attempt to change the development of the issue.
Another example is the Internet mobilization of Chinese people around the world in protest of assaults and killings of ethnic Chinese women in Indonesia.
Last year, up to 20,000 residents of Xiamen City in China’s Fujian Province were mobilized through cellphone text messages and through the Internet to protest against the construction of a chemical plant in the city.
More importantly, the Internet serves as a mouthpiece for disadvantaged groups.
The Zapatista Army of National Liberation is a revolutionary group in Chiapas, Mexico consisting of grassroots farmers who suffered from the North American Free Trade Agreement, and who were besieged by heavily armed police forces. However, this grassroots resistance gained international support after uploading locally gathered information onto the Internet.
Images circulated on the Internet of masked guerillas left a deep impression on many people. In addition, this revolutionary movement and the way it is voicing its opposition have been described as the first “post-modern” movement by the New York Times.
The way the aforementioned social movements used the real-time, interactivity and far-reaching high tech of the Internet can all be found in the student demonstration on Liberty Square. Using the Internet, the student demonstrators connected to all of Taiwan and implemented deliberative democracy to make their voice heard.
Let this serve as a warning to both the establishment and its bureaucrats and mainstream media outlets: Passive inaction and selective or distorted reporting will no longer convince the public because the government and the mainstream media are no longer the only sources of news.
Of course, it cannot be denied that a successful movement needs not only technology, but also the power of discourse and organization as a foundation for its broadcasts. This is the challenge facing student movements when they are trying to overcome the external obstacles to getting their voices heard.
Hung Chen-ling is an assistant professor at National Taiwan University’s Graduate Institute of Journalism.
TRANSLATED BY TED YANG
A nation has several pillars of national defense, among them are military strength, energy and food security, and national unity. Military strength is very much on the forefront of the debate, while several recent editorials have dealt with energy security. National unity and a sense of shared purpose — especially while a powerful, hostile state is becoming increasingly menacing — are problematic, and would continue to be until the nation’s schizophrenia is properly managed. The controversy over the past few days over former navy lieutenant commander Lu Li-shih’s (呂禮詩) usage of the term “our China” during an interview about his attendance
Bo Guagua (薄瓜瓜), the son of former Chinese Communist Party (CCP) Central Committee Politburo member and former Chongqing Municipal Communist Party secretary Bo Xilai (薄熙來), used his British passport to make a low-key entry into Taiwan on a flight originating in Canada. He is set to marry the granddaughter of former political heavyweight Hsu Wen-cheng (許文政), the founder of Luodong Poh-Ai Hospital in Yilan County’s Luodong Township (羅東). Bo Xilai is a former high-ranking CCP official who was once a challenger to Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) for the chairmanship of the CCP. That makes Bo Guagua a bona fide “third-generation red”
US president-elect Donald Trump earlier this year accused Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co (TSMC) of “stealing” the US chip business. He did so to have a favorable bargaining chip in negotiations with Taiwan. During his first term from 2017 to 2021, Trump demanded that European allies increase their military budgets — especially Germany, where US troops are stationed — and that Japan and South Korea share more of the costs for stationing US troops in their countries. He demanded that rich countries not simply enjoy the “protection” the US has provided since the end of World War II, while being stingy with
Historically, in Taiwan, and in present-day China, many people advocate the idea of a “great Chinese nation.” It is not worth arguing with extremists to say that the so-called “great Chinese nation” is a fabricated political myth rather than an academic term. Rather, they should read the following excerpt from Chinese writer Lin Yutang’s (林語堂) book My Country and My People: “It is also inevitable that I should offend many writers about China, especially my own countrymen and great patriots. These great patriots — I have nothing to do with them, for their god is not my god, and their patriotism is
RSS