Ever since the US presidential election, advice has been showering down on president-elect Barack Obama like snowflakes in a driving blizzard.
Pundits right and left, politicians of every stripe, think tankers inside and outside Washington, lobbyists galore and not a few private citizens have been trying to instruct Obama on everything from negotiating with a rising China to dealing with an enigmatic North Korea to resolving the seemingly intractable conflict between Israel and the Arabs.
Indeed, it might not be too much to say that the US today has one president-elect and 300 million advisers who proffer policies to adopt, books and papers to read and diagrams on how to reorganize the government — all of which, in a robust democracy, may not be such a bad thing.
In particular, Obama has been deluged with the names of people who might be appointed to his Cabinet or other senior positions in his administration. Therein runs a process riddled with wondrous irony.
The president-elect ran a campaign on the theme of “change.” That he rarely defined what he proposed to change was immaterial; “change” was to be the byword of the Obama administration.
Yet the lists of candidates for high office are filled with the names of throwbacks to the era of former president Bill Clinton and of Washington’s Democratic establishment.
Obama’s regime thus seems to be shaping up as the Clinton Restoration. In the context of Democratic politics, Obama defied the establishment to win his party’s nomination and may have been as much a maverick as his Republican opponent, Senator John McCain. Now the Democrats, led by the Clinton clique, have set out to capture Obama before he moves into the White House.
IN CHARGE
In charge of the Obama transition is John Podesta, onetime chief of staff for president Clinton. Overseeing the selection of a foreign policy team is Warren Christopher, Clinton’s first secretary of state. Doing the same on defense is former senator Sam Nunn, who chaired the Armed Services Committee during the Clinton days. The new White House chief of staff is Rahm Emanuel, a staff aide to Clinton.
Amid jockeying for position inside the Beltway around Washington is said to be Clinton himself, possibly for ambassador to the UN or another highly visible job, and, of course, Senator Hillary Rodham Clinton of New York.
Former vice president Al Gore is being considered for secretary of the interior where, as a Nobel Prize winner, he would influence environmental policy. Senator John Kerry, the Democratic nominee in 2004, is reported to be running hard to be secretary of state. Lawrence Summers, Treasury secretary under Clinton, may come back from Harvard.
On it goes, with scores of sub-Cabinet officers during the Clinton era angling for higher posts in the Obama administration. Fluttering out of Washington are names like Strobe Talbot, Susan Rice, Robert Zoellick, James Steinberg, Kurt Campbell, Richard Danzig and Anthony Lake, all connected one way or another with the Clinton cluster.
Perhaps most ironic is the persistent rumor that Secretary of Defense Robert Gates, the widely respected Republican, will be asked to stay on, maybe even indefinitely. Obama campaigned on withdrawing US troops from Iraq promptly and on a schedule. Gates is the architect of the strategy of bringing the troops home only after the Iraqis can fight their own battles.
Dick Morris, the acerbic former Clinton adviser, wrote recently: “Obama based his innovative campaign on an emphatic and convincing commitment to change the culture of Washington and bring in new people, new ideas, and new ways of doing business. But now, Obama has definitely changed his tune.”
Morris concluded that “Obama appears to be practicing the politics of status quo, not the politics of change.”
Mr President-elect, a quiet plea from the island of your birth: Be true to your battle cry of “change” and look across the nation for fresh faces. Appoint no one else who has served in Washington for the last 16 years — no Clintonistas, no Bushies, no lobbyists, no beltway bandits, unless he or she has compelling credentials. You can always reach out, case by case, if you need counsel from former insiders.
In Chicago where you learned your politics, there was an old saying: “Throw the rascals out.”
You might sandpaper that to: “Keep the rascals out.”
Richard Halloran is a writer based in Hawaii.
It is employment pass renewal season in Singapore, and the new regime is dominating the conversation at after-work cocktails on Fridays. From September, overseas employees on a work visa would need to fulfill the city-state’s new points-based system, and earn a minimum salary threshold to stay in their jobs. While this mirrors what happens in other countries, it risks turning foreign companies away, and could tarnish the nation’s image as a global business hub. The program was announced in 2022 in a bid to promote fair hiring practices. Points are awarded for how a candidate’s salary compares with local peers, along
China last month enacted legislation to punish —including with the death penalty — “die-hard Taiwanese independence separatists.” The country’s leaders, including Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平), need to be reminded about what the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) has said and done in the past. They should think about whether those historical figures were also die-hard advocates of Taiwanese independence. The Taiwanese Communist Party was established in the Shanghai French Concession in April 1928, with a political charter that included the slogans “Long live the independence of the Taiwanese people” and “Establish a republic of Taiwan.” The CCP sent a representative, Peng
Japan and the Philippines on Monday signed a defense agreement that would facilitate joint drills between them. The pact was made “as both face an increasingly assertive China,” and is in line with Philippine President Ferdinand Marcos Jr’s “effort to forge security alliances to bolster the Philippine military’s limited ability to defend its territorial interests in the South China Sea,” The Associated Press (AP) said. The pact also comes on the heels of comments by former US deputy national security adviser Matt Pottinger, who said at a forum on Tuesday last week that China’s recent aggression toward the Philippines in
The Ministry of National Defense on Tuesday announced that the military would hold its annual Han Kuang exercises from July 22 to 26. Military officers said the exercises would feature unscripted war games, and a decentralized command and control structure. This year’s exercises underline the recent reforms in Taiwan’s military as it transitions from a top-down command structure to one where autonomy is pushed down to the front lines to improve decisionmaking and adaptability. Militaries around the world have been observing and studying Russia’s war in Ukraine. They have seen that the Ukrainian military has been much quicker to adapt to