Has the administration of President Ma Ying-jeou (馬英九) thought through its headlong embrace of China? The deals to expand relations covering shipping, air transport and postal services might look like progress but the question is: who is calling the shots?
It is certainly not the Ma government. So far, Beijing has not moved an inch in terms of acknowledging Taiwan’s identity. Describing the advance in relations, China’s top negotiator, Chen Yunlin (陳雲林), called it “a crystallization of the joint efforts of many compatriots across the Strait.”
In other words, it is a process of integrating Taiwan into China.
China’s infiltration into Taiwan through such expanded contacts will be a nightmare to monitor and regulate. From the exchanges between the two sides so far, one doesn’t get a sense that the Ma administration is seeking to guard Taiwan’s sovereign identity.
The sense rather is that the Ma administration is acting as a facilitator. And any opposition to this is being harshly handled, sometimes draconian measures have been used against political dissent.
There are even fears that there might be a concerted attempt to undermine democracy in Taiwan to promote Beijing’s agenda.
The Ma government has a mandate to govern but not to diminish or barter away Taiwan’s sovereignty. The will of the people should determine Taiwan’s future.
It is pertinent to remember that most polls have indicated an overwhelming popular desire to maintain Taiwan’s distinct political status.
Now that a series of deals about expanding services have been concluded, the two sides will obviously move on to the political agenda.
Will China enter into a peace treaty? That would seem highly unlikely, suggesting a relationship of sovereign equality between the two sides that is anathema to Beijing.
Will China allow Taipei some space on the international stage in forums like the UN and its agencies? Again, it would seem highly unlikely.
The arguments generally given in favor of greater integration and eventual unification with China are three-fold.
First is the argument of a common and shared culture and language.
By that logic, Australia and New Zealand, which not only share a common language and heritage but also have geographical proximity, should have merged into one country long ago.
In the Middle East, where people in most countries speak Arabic and share a common Islamic heritage, national identities are as important as ever.
And such examples can be multiplied.
Taiwan has a distinct political identity and is a middle-sized nation of more than 20 million people, about as much as Australia and about five times the population of New Zealand.
The second argument favoring Taiwan’s integration is to further peace and harmony across the Taiwan Strait.
This again doesn’t seem terribly smart and convincing. If in the process of buying peace, a country has to surrender its sovereignty, the world would be a very turbulent and unhappy place.
In such a world, very few small countries will be able to maintain their independence and sovereignty when faced with aggression from a powerful neighbor.
The third argument is to expand Taiwan’s economic prosperity by throwing in its lot with China. However, so far, despite all the fanfare of moving in with China, concrete results in terms of economic advantage are not yet apparent.
Besides, Taiwan hasn’t done badly without needing to be submerged into China. It has been one of Asia’s most successful economies.
So why is the Ma administration in such an unseemly haste to hitch Taiwan’s wagon to a wayward Chinese engine?
Is there a sense that Taiwan’s time as an independent political entity has run out? With China so powerful and the US mired in the Middle East, Taiwan might seem so vulnerable that a deal with China seems the only alternative.
That is not necessarily the case. Indeed, if the US interest in Taiwan were to slacken (and don’t bet on it, with president-elect Barack Obama keen on revamping US strategic priorities), Beijing won’t have to fear that Taiwan could be turned into a US base of sorts to threaten China.
Taiwan will hardly be a threat to China.
Taiwan indeed can remain as a successful pilot project for democracy in China at some future time if the latter were to descend into social instability.
A close relationship between China and Taiwan can develop as it has between Australia and New Zealand, with neither fearing the other while partaking of all the benefits of a shared heritage.
The Ma administration needs to be a bit more creative in its dealings with China. It doesn’t need to crawl when all it needs is a steady walk, assuming that it wants to save Taiwan from China.
Sushil Seth is a writer based in Australia.
Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) caucus whip Fu Kun-chi (傅?萁) has caused havoc with his attempts to overturn the democratic and constitutional order in the legislature. If we look at this devolution from the context of a transition to democracy from authoritarianism in a culturally Chinese sense — that of zhonghua (中華) — then we are playing witness to a servile spirit from a millennia-old form of totalitarianism that is intent on damaging the nation’s hard-won democracy. This servile spirit is ingrained in Chinese culture. About a century ago, Chinese satirist and author Lu Xun (魯迅) saw through the servile nature of
In their New York Times bestseller How Democracies Die, Harvard political scientists Steven Levitsky and Daniel Ziblatt said that democracies today “may die at the hands not of generals but of elected leaders. Many government efforts to subvert democracy are ‘legal,’ in the sense that they are approved by the legislature or accepted by the courts. They may even be portrayed as efforts to improve democracy — making the judiciary more efficient, combating corruption, or cleaning up the electoral process.” Moreover, the two authors observe that those who denounce such legal threats to democracy are often “dismissed as exaggerating or
Monday was the 37th anniversary of former president Chiang Ching-kuo’s (蔣經國) death. Chiang — a son of former president Chiang Kai-shek (蔣介石), who had implemented party-state rule and martial law in Taiwan — has a complicated legacy. Whether one looks at his time in power in a positive or negative light depends very much on who they are, and what their relationship with the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) is. Although toward the end of his life Chiang Ching-kuo lifted martial law and steered Taiwan onto the path of democratization, these changes were forced upon him by internal and external pressures,
The Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) caucus in the Legislative Yuan has made an internal decision to freeze NT$1.8 billion (US$54.7 million) of the indigenous submarine project’s NT$2 billion budget. This means that up to 90 percent of the budget cannot be utilized. It would only be accessible if the legislature agrees to lift the freeze sometime in the future. However, for Taiwan to construct its own submarines, it must rely on foreign support for several key pieces of equipment and technology. These foreign supporters would also be forced to endure significant pressure, infiltration and influence from Beijing. In other words,
RSS