After Association for Relations Across the Taiwan Strait (ARATS) Chairman Chen Yunlin’s (陳雲林) stormy five-day sojourn in Taiwan, it is time for Taiwanese to see their primping president for the little man that he really is.
What should have been a routine visit by a low-level Chinese official to ink prearranged agreements turned into a near riot and cost Taiwanese millions of dollars in wasted resources and opened their eyes to police brutality not seen since the days of the Kaohsiung Incident. This is not because of the legitimate anger and protests staged by concerned citizens, but because of the inept mishandling of and callous indifference to the whole situation by Taiwan’s sometime president, Ma Ying-jeou (馬英九).
Let there be no question about it: Blame lies squarely on the shoulders of Ma. So caught up was Ma in the fact that his image was suffering and that his approval rating had dropped to an all-time low of 23 percent that he could only see that he needed something “historic” to prop up his failed China policy. So caught up was he in wanting to claim to have done something “historic” to present to the US and Chinese governments and gain their paternalistic approval that he became oblivious to the feelings and concerns of his own country.
Despite all of Ma’s pre-arranged hype, Chen’s visit was nothing historic. The agreements that ARATS inked with Taiwan’s Straits Exchange Foundation were agreements that had begun and been fashioned in the preceding years by former president Chen Shui-bian’s (陳水扁) administration. Higher-level officials from Taiwan had also visited China; the only thing that could be claimed to be historic was that it was the first time that an arrogant, low-level Chinese official deigned to visit Taiwan and be wined and dined by his party’s previous enemies. If that is historic, it is only historic for the little minds of the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT).
With this background, even a dunce could have seen the storm that was gathering. Taiwanese are not against trade with China; Taiwan is one of the biggest — if not the biggest — investor and trader with China. What Taiwanese are against is trade at the cost of their sovereignty.
After fighting for decades for democracy, they have legitimate concerns about whether they would be sold out, judging from the loose, cavalier and speedy way Ma was handling the meeting. In this matter, Ma has lost all credibility and the trust of Taiwanese. The past two months saw three increasingly large protests against Ma, with the final march on Oct. 25 attended by some 600,000 people in the pan-blue capital.
If Ma had given clear, concrete public assurances before Chen Yunlin’s visit, Taiwanese could have handled the arrogance of the Chinese representative. But instead of reassuring the public he would never sell out Taiwan, instead of giving clear signals to China and the Taiwanese that he is the president of a sovereign country, Ma hid in the presidential palace and conjured up legal constitutional conundrums to state why any explanations were unnecessary.
It was therefore not a surprise when Chen Yunlin came that the protests became a reality and increased in size day by day. At this crucial point, instead of reassuring the public that their fears were unfounded, Ma’s solution was to sequester Chen Yunlin in the Grand Hotel and turn it into a fortress surrounded by police. When he left the hotel to be wined and dined by the KMT throughout the city, Ma’s only solution again was to increase police support. When the public voiced open disapproval, Ma approved orders to attack.
Throughout the five days, where was Ma? When Ma should have been in the streets convincing the public of his sincerity, he was nowhere to be seen. Instead of sincerity, the public saw arrogance. Despite being the people’s representative, Ma felt he didn’t have to explain himself to the public.
This is the increasing contention in Taiwan. Not only is Ma seen as incompetent, but he is also viewed as arrogant. If there are any Taiwan watchers in the US or Europe who have doubts about how Taiwanese view Ma’s ineptitude, they only have to examine the following: It took US President George W. Bush six to eight years in office to convince the majority of Americans of his lack of leadership and ineptitude; Ma has been able to do the same for Taiwan in only four months.
Jerome Keating is a writer based in Taipei.
US President Donald Trump has gotten off to a head-spinning start in his foreign policy. He has pressured Denmark to cede Greenland to the United States, threatened to take over the Panama Canal, urged Canada to become the 51st US state, unilaterally renamed the Gulf of Mexico to “the Gulf of America” and announced plans for the United States to annex and administer Gaza. He has imposed and then suspended 25 percent tariffs on Canada and Mexico for their roles in the flow of fentanyl into the United States, while at the same time increasing tariffs on China by 10
US President Donald Trump last week announced plans to impose reciprocal tariffs on eight countries. As Taiwan, a key hub for semiconductor manufacturing, is among them, the policy would significantly affect the country. In response, Minister of Economic Affairs J.W. Kuo (郭智輝) dispatched two officials to the US for negotiations, and Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co’s (TSMC) board of directors convened its first-ever meeting in the US. Those developments highlight how the US’ unstable trade policies are posing a growing threat to Taiwan. Can the US truly gain an advantage in chip manufacturing by reversing trade liberalization? Is it realistic to
Last week, 24 Republican representatives in the US Congress proposed a resolution calling for US President Donald Trump’s administration to abandon the US’ “one China” policy, calling it outdated, counterproductive and not reflective of reality, and to restore official diplomatic relations with Taiwan, enter bilateral free-trade agreement negotiations and support its entry into international organizations. That is an exciting and inspiring development. To help the US government and other nations further understand that Taiwan is not a part of China, that those “one China” policies are contrary to the fact that the two countries across the Taiwan Strait are independent and
The US Department of State has removed the phrase “we do not support Taiwan independence” in its updated Taiwan-US relations fact sheet, which instead iterates that “we expect cross-strait differences to be resolved by peaceful means, free from coercion, in a manner acceptable to the people on both sides of the Strait.” This shows a tougher stance rejecting China’s false claims of sovereignty over Taiwan. Since switching formal diplomatic recognition from the Republic of China to the People’s Republic of China in 1979, the US government has continually indicated that it “does not support Taiwan independence.” The phrase was removed in 2022
RSS