Surrendering sovereignty
While the implications of the talks between the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) and the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) are still unknown, President Ma Ying-jeou (馬英九) and his fellow KMT dignitaries’ frantic pursuit of a position as governor of a Chinese province rather than serving as the leader of a sovereign state — Taiwan — is becoming clear as events unfold.
The public has the inalienable right to show its distaste through peaceful demonstrations against Chinese envoys, who in the past have done their best to verbally intimidate and denigrate Taiwan in international settings. Unfortunately, Mr Ma was so humbled that to make Association for Relations Across the Taiwan Strait Chairman Chen Yunlin (陳雲林) and his entourage feel at home when they visited last week, he ordered whatever it took to ensure that the demonstrations were not seen by his “noble” guests.
Not only was this a poor negotiation strategy, but it also showed that the Ma administration was ready to surrender democracy and freedom of expression, for which Taiwanese have fought so hard for more than five decades, just to please the Chinese. It’s the administration and its inability to deal with the economic problems — not the Chinese envoys per se or the riot police — that triggered the anger and violence in the ensuing protests.
If Chen’s visit could trigger the mass deployment of riot police and the temporary suspension of freedom of expression, we should not be surprised to see Ma sending tanks into the crowd as China did in Tiananmen Square two decades ago when Chinese officers come to Taiwan next time to show his Chinese superiors that he and the KMT are really in the same boat with the CCP against democracy and independence.
Han Lin
Chunan, Miaoli County
Ma, KMT to blame for unrest
President Ma Ying-jeou is responsible for the stormy protests against Association for Relations Acrosss the Taiwan Strait Chairman Chen Yunlin last week. Taiwanese are not against trade with China. Taiwan is China’s biggest investor and a large trade partner. What Taiwanese are venting about is trade at the cost of sovereignty. After decades of fighting for democracy, they have legitimate concerns about whether they will be sold out by Ma, Taiwan’s pro-unification leader.
In negotiating for Chen’s visit, Ma essentially reduced Taiwan’s status to a “nongovernment organization,” agreed to be called “Mr” instead of “president,” took down all of Taiwan’s national flags within Chen’s sight and claimed a district-to-district relationship between Taiwan and China. The recent large protests and increasing discontent with Ma’s administration are clear signs that Taiwanese are not ready to trade in their hard-earned democracy for economic gains, and that Ma and his small group of Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) elite do not represent mainstream Taiwanese opinion.
These protests also reveal the unsettling fact that Taiwan is not yet a true democracy. The election of former president Chen Shui-bian (陳水扁), the first non-KMT president, in 2000 created an illusion that Taiwan had achieved democracy. In reality, Taiwan’s current political system is best described as a pseudo-democracy. Since the end of World War II, Taiwanese politics has always been dominated and dictated by the KMT. Chen was elected only because of infighting between KMT factions.
During the democratic movement in the last two decades, the KMT has stonewalled the political reform process. To maintain control, the KMT deliberately set up barriers to prevent further political reforms. The ill effects of these political impediments have begun to emerge. For example, in the last election, 42 percent of the votes for the opposition party only resulted in 24 percent representation in the legislature. This was the outcome of biased election rules enacted by the KMT-controlled legislature. Referendums, the people’s fundamental right to democracy, were essentially barricaded. This, coupled with the fact that a majority of the mass media is run by KMT-controlled business and billions of dollars embezzled in the authoritarian era were used to market KMT candidates, ensured a KMT win in any nationwide election.
That the Legislative Yuan has been continuously dominated by the KMT for 60 years with no possible alternative in sight proves that Taiwan is not a true democracy. While a Zogby poll showed 85 percent of Taiwanese support UN membership, the Legislative Yuan obstructed all proposals for improving Taiwan’s national status throughout Chen Shui-bian’s term in office.
Even though its approval rating has sunk to less than 20 percent, the KMT-dominated Legislative Yuan continues to ignore the multiple protests of up to 500,000 people. And Ma continues his dominance without fear of any political repercussions, including verbally reducing Taiwan’s autonomy to a district relationship with China without putting it to a vote through a referendum or legislative oversight.
This insensitivity and ignorance of mainstream opinion will continue to cause civil unrest. Since the KMT has full control of both the executive and the legislature, it has full responsibility for providing a safe, congenial and true democracy.
This can only be done by establishing a genuine democratic political system and by returning political power to the citizens of Taiwan. All political parties should be fairly represented according to the popular vote, and Taiwanese should have the unobstructed right to hold national referendums. Only then can elected officials and representatives accurately reflect the aspirations of the people and enact laws and regulations that would further democracy and benefit society. Only then can the relationship between Taiwan and China be established with the full consent of Taiwanese.
Taiwan’s democracy has been hijacked by the KMT, whose pro-unification ideology represents the voice of a small minority, yet dominates the political landscape.
STAN YANG
Laguna Hills, California
Concerns that the US might abandon Taiwan are often overstated. While US President Donald Trump’s handling of Ukraine raised unease in Taiwan, it is crucial to recognize that Taiwan is not Ukraine. Under Trump, the US views Ukraine largely as a European problem, whereas the Indo-Pacific region remains its primary geopolitical focus. Taipei holds immense strategic value for Washington and is unlikely to be treated as a bargaining chip in US-China relations. Trump’s vision of “making America great again” would be directly undermined by any move to abandon Taiwan. Despite the rhetoric of “America First,” the Trump administration understands the necessity of
US President Donald Trump’s challenge to domestic American economic-political priorities, and abroad to the global balance of power, are not a threat to the security of Taiwan. Trump’s success can go far to contain the real threat — the Chinese Communist Party’s (CCP) surge to hegemony — while offering expanded defensive opportunities for Taiwan. In a stunning affirmation of the CCP policy of “forceful reunification,” an obscene euphemism for the invasion of Taiwan and the destruction of its democracy, on March 13, 2024, the People’s Liberation Army’s (PLA) used Chinese social media platforms to show the first-time linkage of three new
If you had a vision of the future where China did not dominate the global car industry, you can kiss those dreams goodbye. That is because US President Donald Trump’s promised 25 percent tariff on auto imports takes an ax to the only bits of the emerging electric vehicle (EV) supply chain that are not already dominated by Beijing. The biggest losers when the levies take effect this week would be Japan and South Korea. They account for one-third of the cars imported into the US, and as much as two-thirds of those imported from outside North America. (Mexico and Canada, while
The military is conducting its annual Han Kuang exercises in phases. The minister of national defense recently said that this year’s scenarios would simulate defending the nation against possible actions the Chinese People’s Liberation Army (PLA) might take in an invasion of Taiwan, making the threat of a speculated Chinese invasion in 2027 a heated agenda item again. That year, also referred to as the “Davidson window,” is named after then-US Indo-Pacific Command Admiral Philip Davidson, who in 2021 warned that Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) had instructed the PLA to be ready to invade Taiwan by 2027. Xi in 2017
RSS