An Australian intelligence agent in Tokyo was once asked what was his nation’s essential interest in Japan.
Without hesitation, he said: “To keep Japan onside.”
He explained that his country did not want Japan to return to the disastrous aggression of the 1930s and 1940s.
A senior US military officer in Japan more recently said that “US-Japan relations are built on a solid alliance.”
But he added: “This is a really high maintenance alliance,” meaning that Americans had to nurture relations with Japan daily to prevent Tokyo from sliding back into the passive mode that has marked much of the postwar era.
Few today fear that Japan will again send its armies through China and Southeast Asia to the gates of India.
But there is concern that Japan’s alliance with the US is eroding because the US, notably the administration of US President George W. Bush, has not engaged in the required “high maintenance” to keep Japan “onside” in the political and security game in Asia.
In a study released last week, the Chicago Council on Global Affairs said many Japanese commentators “have worried that the United States is losing interest in Japan.”
“Japanese anxiety about the American commitment to the alliance has grown out of the Bush administration’s active [and to many Japanese, unconditional] engagement of North Korea since 2007,” the council said.
“This new dynamic has evoked memories of ‘Japan passing,’ a phrase coined during [former US] president Bill Clinton’s nine-day visit to China in 1998,” bypassing Japan, the council said.
Actually, “Japan passing” has even earlier roots, such as when former US president Richard Nixon pursued normalization of relations with China in 1971 without informing the Japanese.
This long simmering anxiety in Tokyo appears to have spurred Japan to cultivate its own relations with China.
Japanese Prime Minister Taro Aso said in Beijing 10 days ago: “It is difficult to name other countries as important to Japan as China is.”
Japanese leaders have been uncharacteristically candid in expressing dismay over US concessions to North Korea in taking Pyongyang off a list of sponsors of terror.
Tokyo has particularly criticized the failure of the US to consult with it. And many have asserted that the US has not supported them in demanding that North Korea come clean on the abductions of Japanese.
Japanese political leaders, strategic thinkers and commentators have repeatedly contended that the US preoccupation with the wars in Iraq and Afghanistan, plus what Bush officials call the global war on terror, has left them little time to pay attention to relations with Japan.
Another concern, that the US might not defend Japan against attack, has also reappeared, even if behind closed doors. Japanese leaders have asked US officers whether Japan can count on the US to maintain a nuclear umbrella over Japan.
Moreover, Japan sees little to choose from US presidential candidates. Neither has said much about Japan during the campaign.
The campaign literature for both has been routine boilerplate.
Senator Barack Obama says: “The alliance demands, and is deserving of, close political cooperation and coordination at every level, reflecting the key role Japan plays as anchor of US economic and security interests in the region and across the globe.”
Similarly, Senator John McCain says: “The US-Japan alliance has been the indispensable anchor of peace, prosperity and freedom in the Asia-Pacific for more than 60 years, and its importance will only grow.”
Thoughtful Japanese views can be found in a series of essays published in English by the Japan Institute of International Affairs, a think tank headed by Yukio Satoh, Tokyo’s former ambassador to the UN.
The removal of North Korea from the list of state sponsors of terror, said Koji Murata, a political scientist at Doshisha University in Kyoto, and the last minute notification of Japan of that action left Japanese with a “sense of abandonment” on one hand and a fear of being “entrapped” in US strategy on the other.
“This is certainly a crisis for the Japan-US alliance,” Murata wrote.
A strategic analyst, Yukio Okamoto, was pessimistic about the immediate future.
“It would be a mistake for Japan to lapse into complacency regarding the expectations a new US administration may have for the security relationship,” Okamoto said.
“A jolt of new activity, if you will, will be necessary to get the relationship off to a good start,” he said.
Richard Halloran is a writer based in Hawaii.
Trying to force a partnership between Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co (TSMC) and Intel Corp would be a wildly complex ordeal. Already, the reported request from the Trump administration for TSMC to take a controlling stake in Intel’s US factories is facing valid questions about feasibility from all sides. Washington would likely not support a foreign company operating Intel’s domestic factories, Reuters reported — just look at how that is going over in the steel sector. Meanwhile, many in Taiwan are concerned about the company being forced to transfer its bleeding-edge tech capabilities and give up its strategic advantage. This is especially
US President Donald Trump’s second administration has gotten off to a fast start with a blizzard of initiatives focused on domestic commitments made during his campaign. His tariff-based approach to re-ordering global trade in a manner more favorable to the United States appears to be in its infancy, but the significant scale and scope are undeniable. That said, while China looms largest on the list of national security challenges, to date we have heard little from the administration, bar the 10 percent tariffs directed at China, on specific priorities vis-a-vis China. The Congressional hearings for President Trump’s cabinet have, so far,
For years, the use of insecure smart home appliances and other Internet-connected devices has resulted in personal data leaks. Many smart devices require users’ location, contact details or access to cameras and microphones to set up, which expose people’s personal information, but are unnecessary to use the product. As a result, data breaches and security incidents continue to emerge worldwide through smartphone apps, smart speakers, TVs, air fryers and robot vacuums. Last week, another major data breach was added to the list: Mars Hydro, a Chinese company that makes Internet of Things (IoT) devices such as LED grow lights and the
The US Department of State has removed the phrase “we do not support Taiwan independence” in its updated Taiwan-US relations fact sheet, which instead iterates that “we expect cross-strait differences to be resolved by peaceful means, free from coercion, in a manner acceptable to the people on both sides of the Strait.” This shows a tougher stance rejecting China’s false claims of sovereignty over Taiwan. Since switching formal diplomatic recognition from the Republic of China to the People’s Republic of China in 1979, the US government has continually indicated that it “does not support Taiwan independence.” The phrase was removed in 2022
RSS