When 600,000 people gathered along Ketagalan Boulevard in Taipei to vent their anger at the administration of President Ma Ying-jeou (馬英九) and flashed a laser image onto the Presidential Office building that read “incompetent,” I recalled US author Henry David Thoreau, who said in his essay “Civil Disobedience,” published in 1849, that “all men recognize the right of revolution; that is, the right to refuse allegiance to, and to resist, the government, when its tyranny or its inefficiency are great and unendurable.”
After the public expressed its anger at the Ma administration’s China-leaning policies by way of concrete action, Ma shamelessly remarked that his policies were on the right track and persisted with inviting Association for Relations Across the Taiwan Strait Chairman Chen Yulin (陳雲林) to Taiwan without showing any regard for the potential safety threats posed by Chinese missiles, epidemic diseases and tainted food products. Thoreau’s words thus provide food for thought.
To provoke Chen and express dissatisfaction with the Ma administration’s cross-strait policies, the Democratic Progressive Party has proposed to mobilize the public to stage a protest over several nights at Yuanshan Park along with other large rallies. As citizens of Taiwan, there is actually a lot more we can do.
According to the theory of civil disobedience championed by Thoreau and Mahatma Gandhi, as long as the anti-Chen rallies conform to principles of public expression of opinion, non-violence and willingness to accept punishment — as there may be violations of traffic rules or the Assembly and Parade Law (集會遊行法) — such protests can be viewed as a concrete manifestation of civil disobedience by the Taiwanese public.
For instance, we could mobilize millions of vehicles such as private cars, taxis, trucks, buses and even scooters or bicycles with national flags and protest banners to paralyze the traffic surrounding the Taiwan Taoyuan International Airport when Chen arrives in Taiwan. Or we could block the traffic around the Grand Hotel or other hotels in Taipei to make Chen’s life difficult during his visit.
These actions would give Chen a sense of the fury the Taiwanese public feels against the Chinese government. If this happened, the provocation campaign could be considered successful.
In addition, during Chen’s five-day visit to Taiwan, residents of the greater Taipei area could also hang our national flag outside their homes and put up posters and banners that say “Taiwan and China: One Country on Each Side of the Taiwan Strait” to express opposition to the “one China” formula. While there may be instances where the Ma government cowardly puts away our national flags during Chen’s visit, the public can put up our flags to show patriotism and speak out against Ma’s phony patriotism. This is another way we can practice “civil disobedience.”
Chen Yi-chung is a graduate student in the Department of Political Science at Tunghai University.
TRANSLATED BY TED YANG
Why is Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) not a “happy camper” these days regarding Taiwan? Taiwanese have not become more “CCP friendly” in response to the Chinese Communist Party’s (CCP) use of spies and graft by the United Front Work Department, intimidation conducted by the People’s Liberation Army (PLA) and the Armed Police/Coast Guard, and endless subversive political warfare measures, including cyber-attacks, economic coercion, and diplomatic isolation. The percentage of Taiwanese that prefer the status quo or prefer moving towards independence continues to rise — 76 percent as of December last year. According to National Chengchi University (NCCU) polling, the Taiwanese
It would be absurd to claim to see a silver lining behind every US President Donald Trump cloud. Those clouds are too many, too dark and too dangerous. All the same, viewed from a domestic political perspective, there is a clear emerging UK upside to Trump’s efforts at crashing the post-Cold War order. It might even get a boost from Thursday’s Washington visit by British Prime Minister Keir Starmer. In July last year, when Starmer became prime minister, the Labour Party was rigidly on the defensive about Europe. Brexit was seen as an electorally unstable issue for a party whose priority
US President Donald Trump is systematically dismantling the network of multilateral institutions, organizations and agreements that have helped prevent a third world war for more than 70 years. Yet many governments are twisting themselves into knots trying to downplay his actions, insisting that things are not as they seem and that even if they are, confronting the menace in the White House simply is not an option. Disagreement must be carefully disguised to avoid provoking his wrath. For the British political establishment, the convenient excuse is the need to preserve the UK’s “special relationship” with the US. Following their White House
US President Donald Trump’s return to the White House has brought renewed scrutiny to the Taiwan-US semiconductor relationship with his claim that Taiwan “stole” the US chip business and threats of 100 percent tariffs on foreign-made processors. For Taiwanese and industry leaders, understanding those developments in their full context is crucial while maintaining a clear vision of Taiwan’s role in the global technology ecosystem. The assertion that Taiwan “stole” the US’ semiconductor industry fundamentally misunderstands the evolution of global technology manufacturing. Over the past four decades, Taiwan’s semiconductor industry, led by Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co (TSMC), has grown through legitimate means
RSS