While the upcoming visit of China’s Association for Relations Across the Taiwan Strait Chairman Chen Yunlin (陳雲林) for the second round of talks with Straits Exchange Foundation Chairman Chiang Pin-kung (江丙坤) may seem focused on economic issues, we must remember that the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) is a political creature and that the talks will have undertones that will be aimed at damaging Taiwan’s sovereignty.
Many Taiwanese strongly oppose signing any agreement with China resembling the Closer Economic Partnership Arrangement (CEPA) that Hong Kong signed in 2003.
In 2003, the SARS epidemic spread from China to Hong Kong. Many people died and Hong Kong’s economy was hurt. Then-Hong Kong chief executive Tung Chee-hwa (董建華) was criticized as incompetent for relying on China and its economy to solve Hong Kong’s problems. Almost 1 million people took to the streets in protest.
Following this, China eased restrictions on its nationals traveling to Hong Kong in the name of injecting life into Hong Kong’s retail industry. The government painted this as a panacea for Hong Kong’s economic problems and, as a result, the government neglected transforming the structure of industry in Hong Kong. The result was that Hong Kong became overly dependent on China, and when global financial worries started and China’s economy began to slip, Hong Kong’s economy had hardly any life left in it at all.
The Chinese Academy of Social Sciences and other academics released a joint study entitled the Global Urban Competitiveness Report 2008-2009 in July. Hong Kong ranked 26th in terms of overall competitiveness among other cities in the world — a drop of eight places compared with two years ago. The academy is a think tank for the CCP and if this is what they are saying, how can the present administration’s economists still be willing to sacrifice Taiwan by placing all their hopes in China?
An over-reliance on China caused inflation to rise in Hong Kong as the price of goods in China increased. In July, Hong Kong’s inflation rate was 6.3 percent, the highest in 11 years, with Hong Kong Chief Executive Donald Tsang (曾蔭權) saying that high rates will continue until next fall. Real income in Hong Kong is also dropping and Hong Kong’s stock market has plummeted as markets in the US and China have fallen.
Chinese company stocks account for half the total value of Hong Kong’s bourse and the Hang Seng index finished about two-thirds lower than average several days ago after the Chinese stock market fell 7.2 points. Stocks in Chinese companies have now become a hindrance to Hong Kong’s stock market and are definitely not a panacea for Hong Kong’s economic woes.
Hong Kong’s media has reported a struggling real estate market, slow business and record unemployment rates.Many enterprises have gone bust and Hong Kong-backed businesses in China have also experienced trouble. Federation of Hong Kong Industries chairman Clement Chen (陳鎮仁) has said there are almost 70,000 businesses in China’s Pearl River Delta that are backed by Hong Kong investors and one-quarter of these are expected to go out of business before the Lunar New Year.
Renowned Hong Kong-based economist and long-time believer in the Chinese economy Steven Cheung (張五常) said last Friday that the Chinese economy would experience negative growth if Beijing fails to take timely remedial action. If negative growth does occur, Hong Kong will certainly be affected.
President Ma Ying-jeou (馬英九) and his economists should be paying close attention.
Paul Lin is a political commentator based in Taiwan.
TRANSLATED BY DREW CAMERON
Taiwan’s semiconductor industry gives it a strategic advantage, but that advantage would be threatened as the US seeks to end Taiwan’s monopoly in the industry and as China grows more assertive, analysts said at a security dialogue last week. While the semiconductor industry is Taiwan’s “silicon shield,” its dominance has been seen by some in the US as “a monopoly,” South Korea’s Sungkyunkwan University academic Kwon Seok-joon said at an event held by the Center for Strategic and International Studies. In addition, Taiwan lacks sufficient energy sources and is vulnerable to natural disasters and geopolitical threats from China, he said.
After reading the article by Hideki Nagayama [English version on same page] published in the Liberty Times (sister newspaper of the Taipei Times) on Wednesday, I decided to write this article in hopes of ever so slightly easing my depression. In August, I visited the National Museum of Ethnology in Osaka, Japan, to attend a seminar. While there, I had the chance to look at the museum’s collections. I felt extreme annoyance at seeing that the museum had classified Taiwanese indigenous peoples as part of China’s ethnic minorities. I kept thinking about how I could make this known, but after returning
What value does the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) hold in Taiwan? One might say that it is to defend — or at the very least, maintain — truly “blue” qualities. To be truly “blue” — without impurities, rejecting any “red” influence — is to uphold the ideology consistent with that on which the Republic of China (ROC) was established. The KMT would likely not object to this notion. However, if the current generation of KMT political elites do not understand what it means to be “blue” — or even light blue — their knowledge and bravery are far too lacking
Taipei’s population is estimated to drop below 2.5 million by the end of this month — the only city among the nation’s six special municipalities that has more people moving out than moving in this year. A city that is classified as a special municipality can have three deputy mayors if it has a population of more than 2.5 million people, Article 55 of the Local Government Act (地方制度法) states. To counter the capital’s shrinking population, Taipei Mayor Chiang Wan-an (蔣萬安) held a cross-departmental population policy committee meeting on Wednesday last week to discuss possible solutions. According to Taipei City Government data, Taipei’s