The recent incident involving Association for Relations Across the Taiwan Strait Vice Chairman Zhang Mingqing (張銘清) being mobbed in Tainan allowed many people in Taiwan to gain an understanding of just what exactly is meant by “journalism based on the one country, two systems model.”
Zhang studied journalism and worked as a journalist for more than a decade before taking up a post in the Taiwan Affairs Office (TAO) of China’s State Council, where he also served for more than a decade. When he was appointed dean of the new School of Journalism and Communication at Xiamen University in June last year, he proposed his theory of “journalism based on the one country, two systems model,” which he had conceived more than a decade earlier. “Journalism based on the one country, two systems model” should be classified as part of the overall “one country, two systems” formula.
However, the Chinese and the Taiwanese have different ideas about the media and it is therefore very difficult to have an environment beneficial to the implementation of the “one country, two systems” formula.”
The incident in Tainan has provided the people on both sides of the Taiwan Strait with a perfect opportunity to examine the issue of “journalism based on the one country, two systems model” in more depth. It is quite easy to see how Zhang applied this theory during his visit.
First, let us look at Zhang, for his words and actions are a perfect example of the workings of his theory. During his time as TAO spokesman, Zhang made comments that could almost be considered threats against Taiwan. However, after he arrived in Taiwan, and especially after the Tainan incident, Zhang had to be “different” and had to try to gain the recognition and acceptance of the Taiwanese. This worked, for the teary speech Zhang gave at the airport as he was leaving did manage to win some warmth and understanding from Taiwanese.
Second, we should consider whether this incident was an overflow of emotion on behalf of those worried about Taiwan’s sovereignty being sacrificed or whether it was a straight out act of violence that brought shame upon Taiwan and its democracy. Taiwanese media have shown no change, with different news channels giving totally different explanations of the same footage, with some TV stations focusing on what they view as “violent” acts of those with different political opinions.
However, Zhang made his thoughts clear when he said: “I believe those who behaved violently do not represent Tainan residents or the 23 million people of Taiwan.”
The Chinese media said last Wednesday that “such incidents should be regarded as normal in a diverse society,” a marked change in values compared with the China of the past.
Earlier this year, a book on the media in post-1997 Hong Kong under the “one country, two systems” model, titled Xianggang zai yiguoliangzhi xia de xinwen shengtai (香港在一國兩制下的新聞生態) was published. The book showed the media in Hong Kong is now facing unprecedented challenges in terms of freedom of the press and the government’s control and use of the media.
Legislative Council member Leung Kwok-hung (梁國雄) once said that he was most worried about the people of Hong Kong having to be happy “slaves” that had to forget their most basic dignities and values.
I believe that Taiwanese and everyone involved in the media here believe in freedom of the press. I also believe that we will never be able to stand for a “one country, two systems” basis for the media, which would harm our most basic dignities and values.
Lillian Wang is an associate professor in the Graduate Institute of Journalism at National Taiwan University.
TRANSLATED BY DREW CAMERON
The return of US president-elect Donald Trump to the White House has injected a new wave of anxiety across the Taiwan Strait. For Taiwan, an island whose very survival depends on the delicate and strategic support from the US, Trump’s election victory raises a cascade of questions and fears about what lies ahead. His approach to international relations — grounded in transactional and unpredictable policies — poses unique risks to Taiwan’s stability, economic prosperity and geopolitical standing. Trump’s first term left a complicated legacy in the region. On the one hand, his administration ramped up arms sales to Taiwan and sanctioned
The US election result will significantly impact its foreign policy with global implications. As tensions escalate in the Taiwan Strait and conflicts elsewhere draw attention away from the western Pacific, Taiwan was closely monitoring the election, as many believe that whoever won would confront an increasingly assertive China, especially with speculation over a potential escalation in or around 2027. A second Donald Trump presidency naturally raises questions concerning the future of US policy toward China and Taiwan, with Trump displaying mixed signals as to his position on the cross-strait conflict. US foreign policy would also depend on Trump’s Cabinet and
The Taiwanese have proven to be resilient in the face of disasters and they have resisted continuing attempts to subordinate Taiwan to the People’s Republic of China (PRC). Nonetheless, the Taiwanese can and should do more to become even more resilient and to be better prepared for resistance should the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) try to annex Taiwan. President William Lai (賴清德) argues that the Taiwanese should determine their own fate. This position continues the Democratic Progressive Party’s (DPP) tradition of opposing the CCP’s annexation of Taiwan. Lai challenges the CCP’s narrative by stating that Taiwan is not subordinate to the
Republican candidate and former US president Donald Trump is to be the 47th president of the US after beating his Democratic rival, US Vice President Kamala Harris, in the election on Tuesday. Trump’s thumping victory — winning 295 Electoral College votes against Harris’ 226 as of press time last night, along with the Republicans winning control of the US Senate and possibly the House of Representatives — is a remarkable political comeback from his 2020 defeat to US President Joe Biden, and means Trump has a strong political mandate to implement his agenda. What does Trump’s victory mean for Taiwan, Asia, deterrence