It’s taken a few months, but with today’s rally in Taipei the Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) finally has the chance to gain real ground at the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) government’s expense. The success of the rally, however, will not hinge on any recent increase in support for the DPP but on bipartisan dismay at President Ma Ying-jeou’s (馬英九) leadership and his handling of China and the global financial crisis.
There is an important distinction to be made between the two. The DPP, under Tsai Ing-wen’s (蔡英文) leadership, is attempting to rebuild itself after punishing losses in presidential and legislative elections. Weighed down by years of vision-free leadership, the party has a lot to do before the next local elections, and six months has not been enough time for Tsai to demonstrate changes in grassroots attitudes toward the DPP’s clunky structures, insularity and disunity.
Making things more difficult for the DPP is former president Chen Shui-bian’s near-quixotic insistence on participating in today’s proceedings, an action meant to fight back against the prosecutors on his tail as much as to express solidarity with ordinary people in a just cause.
Yet few of these problems are of genuine concern to those — DPP members or otherwise — who will be next in the firing line when the financial crisis shuts factories, annuls annual bonuses and dries up lines of credit and government spending on welfare and other support mechanisms.
The DPP should be grateful, therefore, that the KMT administration’s performance has been so slipshod and slovenly that its own woes appear petty in comparison.
If the rally is to mean anything to the DPP in the longer term, it must do what it can to aggravate government wounds and pressure Ma, Premier Liu Chao-shiuan (劉兆玄) and the Cabinet into forging a more accountable administration, not least on cross-strait policy.
At some point, in the wake of a successful rally, the DPP must begin to outline explicit policy alternatives that illustrate what the KMT government is doing wrong and why.
The KMT may feel comforted that the Chinese Communist Party has lent it support in the first phase of Ma’s term.
But the KMT stands warned: Cross-strait developments born of ossified ideology that are perceived to exacerbate unemployment at a time of marked economic apprehension will come back to haunt it at the next elections.
The participation of former president Lee Teng-hui (李登輝) and his Taiwan Solidarity Union acolytes in similar activities today suggests the rally has the potential to appeal to a broader base than previous DPP protests. Indeed, Tsai and her advisers should be delighted if the crowd is boosted by people of unpredictable political affiliation.
The challenge for Tsai and the DPP is not just to improve its prospects and invigorate party members, but also to assist in the debunking of KMT hardliners and their China-worship in the eyes of the average KMT voter by broadening the appeal of the larger message.
Stressful times can open up new space for political change. This is one of those times, and it is an opportunity that the DPP, with all of its problems, really cannot afford to waste.
Concerns that the US might abandon Taiwan are often overstated. While US President Donald Trump’s handling of Ukraine raised unease in Taiwan, it is crucial to recognize that Taiwan is not Ukraine. Under Trump, the US views Ukraine largely as a European problem, whereas the Indo-Pacific region remains its primary geopolitical focus. Taipei holds immense strategic value for Washington and is unlikely to be treated as a bargaining chip in US-China relations. Trump’s vision of “making America great again” would be directly undermined by any move to abandon Taiwan. Despite the rhetoric of “America First,” the Trump administration understands the necessity of
US President Donald Trump’s challenge to domestic American economic-political priorities, and abroad to the global balance of power, are not a threat to the security of Taiwan. Trump’s success can go far to contain the real threat — the Chinese Communist Party’s (CCP) surge to hegemony — while offering expanded defensive opportunities for Taiwan. In a stunning affirmation of the CCP policy of “forceful reunification,” an obscene euphemism for the invasion of Taiwan and the destruction of its democracy, on March 13, 2024, the People’s Liberation Army’s (PLA) used Chinese social media platforms to show the first-time linkage of three new
If you had a vision of the future where China did not dominate the global car industry, you can kiss those dreams goodbye. That is because US President Donald Trump’s promised 25 percent tariff on auto imports takes an ax to the only bits of the emerging electric vehicle (EV) supply chain that are not already dominated by Beijing. The biggest losers when the levies take effect this week would be Japan and South Korea. They account for one-third of the cars imported into the US, and as much as two-thirds of those imported from outside North America. (Mexico and Canada, while
I have heard people equate the government’s stance on resisting forced unification with China or the conditional reinstatement of the military court system with the rise of the Nazis before World War II. The comparison is absurd. There is no meaningful parallel between the government and Nazi Germany, nor does such a mindset exist within the general public in Taiwan. It is important to remember that the German public bore some responsibility for the horrors of the Holocaust. Post-World War II Germany’s transitional justice efforts were rooted in a national reckoning and introspection. Many Jews were sent to concentration camps not
RSS