The Mexican dot dance
Dear Johnny,
Recently, you wrote about the Bush administration getting off its “tuckus,” but I think you meant to spell that tuches. I don’t think spellcheck does Yiddish yet. But my late, great Yiddishe amah told me in an e-mail from the great beyond that it’s tuches.
She even told me another phrase you might use in future columns: a tuches lecker is an ass kisser, one who shamelessly curries favor with superiors, she told me, and please pardon her French.
The second thing I want to pass on to you is this: You asked how President Ma Ying-jeou’s (馬英九) interview with Mexican newspaper El Sol de Mexico got into that daily in the first place, characterizing the mashup as a “strange choice of communications vehicle.”
The answer is quite easy to figure out. The boss of the newspaper, Mario Vazquez Rana, came to Taiwan in late August and was decorated with a medal called the Order of the Brilliant Star with Grand Cordon during a ceremony at the Presidential Office. It was Ma that did the decorating.
Connect the dots, Johnny. Ma gives a man a medal; a few days later his newspaper conveniently publishes the “interview” you were talking about.
“One hand washes the other,” as my amah would have put it, were she still alive. I am not sure how to say that in either Yiddish or Spanish, but I think that’s where the dots connect, no?
CHIAYI CHUCK
Johnny replies: Thanks for the information, Chuck.
But a problem remains. In the old days former president Lee Teng-hui (李登輝) would throw a cat among the pigeons every now and then by sitting down with a Japanese reporter and spilling his guts on matters he would never raise with the Taiwanese press.
It made sense. Lee grew up thinking he was Japanese. He speaks the language. He admires the culture. Selective commentary made him feel more powerful and influential.
Ma, Mexico. I’ve joined the dots, Chuck, like you said. But Ma doesn’t speak Spanish and has never been a lover of Hispanic culture. Is this the best that he can do? And it took a full week for the translation to come through!
Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) has prioritized modernizing the Chinese People’s Liberation Army (PLA) to rival the US military, with many experts believing he would not act on Taiwan until the PLA is fully prepared to confront US forces. At the Chinese Communist Party’s 20th Party Congress in 2022, Xi emphasized accelerating this modernization, setting 2027 — the PLA’s centennial — as the new target, replacing the previous 2035 goal. US intelligence agencies said that Xi has directed the PLA to be ready for a potential invasion of Taiwan by 2027, although no decision on launching an attack had been made. Whether
A chip made by Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co (TSMC) was found on a Huawei Technologies Co artificial intelligence (AI) processor, indicating a possible breach of US export restrictions that have been in place since 2019 on sensitive tech to the Chinese firm and others. The incident has triggered significant concern in the IT industry, as it appears that proxy buyers are acting on behalf of restricted Chinese companies to bypass the US rules, which are intended to protect its national security. Canada-based research firm TechInsights conducted a die analysis of the Huawei Ascend 910B AI Trainer, releasing its findings on Oct.
In honor of President Jimmy Carter’s 100th birthday, my longtime friend and colleague John Tkacik wrote an excellent op-ed reassessing Carter’s derecognition of Taipei. But I would like to add my own thoughts on this often-misunderstood president. During Carter’s single term as president of the United States from 1977 to 1981, despite numerous foreign policy and domestic challenges, he is widely recognized for brokering the historic 1978 Camp David Accords that ended the state of war between Egypt and Israel after more than three decades of hostilities. It is considered one of the most significant diplomatic achievements of the 20th century.
In a recent essay in Foreign Affairs, titled “The Upside on Uncertainty in Taiwan,” Johns Hopkins University professor James B. Steinberg makes the argument that the concept of strategic ambiguity has kept a tenuous peace across the Taiwan Strait. In his piece, Steinberg is primarily countering the arguments of Tufts University professor Sulmaan Wasif Khan, who in his thought-provoking new book The Struggle for Taiwan does some excellent out-of-the-box thinking looking at US policy toward Taiwan from 1943 on, and doing some fascinating “what if?” exercises. Reading through Steinberg’s comments, and just starting to read Khan’s book, we could already sense that
RSS