The main purpose of the planned visit by Association for Relations Across the Taiwan Strait (ARATS) Chairman Chen Yunlin (陳雲林) is to push China’s united front strategy, one of three key tactics used by Mao Zedong (毛澤東) during the Chinese revolution. Before Chen’s predecessor Wang Daohan (汪道涵) was scheduled to visit Taiwan in 1999, then-president Lee Teng-hui (李登輝) proposed his “special state-to-state” policy to forge a stronger national consciousness and prevent the nation’s sovereignty from being compromised.
Of course, Chen will not admit to pushing the united front strategy and he has proposed discussing cross-strait cargo flights to disguise the purpose of his visit. This proposal was based on a consensus between the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) and the Chinese Communist Party (CCP).
However, the issue of cargo flights, which had already been agreed on by the previous government, was ignored by high-level KMT officials during the last round of cross-strait talks. They did so to allow the CCP to use the issue as a “gift” to Taiwan when Chen visits.
What lies behind China’s alleged goodwill? This is the fundamental question that Taiwan must ask itself. Former Mainland Affairs Council chairman Chen Ming-tong (陳明通) said that based on Beijing’s strategy toward Taiwan, Chen Yunlin will bring up highly political issues with the intention of pushing Taiwan into China’s unification framework or even transforming the meeting into preliminary talks on unification.
The government must be cautious. Chen Ming-tong’s warning is not a false alarm: The delivery of two pandas, which were originally scheduled to arrive together with Chen Yunlin, has now been canceled. China did not want to cause an unnecessary dispute over the pandas.
The government can use the tainted milk powder scandal to counteract Chen Yunlin’s united-front tactics. Since the toxic milk powder affected individuals and enterprises across the political spectrum in Taiwan, the government can use the incident to mobilize public opinion against Chen Yunlin and the CCP. Moreover, food safety is closely related to national security. Without sovereignty, food safety and the health and well-being of Taiwanese will be jeopardized. Regardless of whether we advocate Taiwanese independence or recognize the Republic of China, there is one constant — anti-unification.
The Taiwanese public now has a rare opportunity to unite and fight the CCP. The protests against President Ma Ying-jeou (馬英九) on Ketagalan Boulevard were distorted by some people into a malicious political battle between pan-blue and pan-green supporters, and the police even got involved. However, if a similar march had been organized to protest against the CCP in the name of national sovereignty, would Ma dare dispatch policemen to arrest participants? If he did, he would reveal his true colors. But if he didn’t, he would certainly displease his CCP “bosses.” This would ultimately put Ma in a position where he would have to choose between Taiwan and the CCP.
Ma’s moves to sell out Taiwan are out of control. He has even rejected the legislature’s right to supervise the process. Both pan-blue and pan-green supporters should take advantage of Chen Yunlin’s visit to safeguard Taiwan’s sovereignty in an unprecedented show of unity.
We cannot expect the pan-blue camp to organize this campaign, so the responsibility must lie with the pan-green camp. Pan-green parties and groups should work together and integrate their limited financial and human resources to set up campaign goals. They cannot just organize campaigns against Ma.
Paul Lin is a political commentator.
TRANSLATED BY TED YANG
Concerns that the US might abandon Taiwan are often overstated. While US President Donald Trump’s handling of Ukraine raised unease in Taiwan, it is crucial to recognize that Taiwan is not Ukraine. Under Trump, the US views Ukraine largely as a European problem, whereas the Indo-Pacific region remains its primary geopolitical focus. Taipei holds immense strategic value for Washington and is unlikely to be treated as a bargaining chip in US-China relations. Trump’s vision of “making America great again” would be directly undermined by any move to abandon Taiwan. Despite the rhetoric of “America First,” the Trump administration understands the necessity of
In an article published on this page on Tuesday, Kaohsiung-based journalist Julien Oeuillet wrote that “legions of people worldwide would care if a disaster occurred in South Korea or Japan, but the same people would not bat an eyelid if Taiwan disappeared.” That is quite a statement. We are constantly reading about the importance of Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co (TSMC), hailed in Taiwan as the nation’s “silicon shield” protecting it from hostile foreign forces such as the Chinese Communist Party (CCP), and so crucial to the global supply chain for semiconductors that its loss would cost the global economy US$1
US President Donald Trump’s challenge to domestic American economic-political priorities, and abroad to the global balance of power, are not a threat to the security of Taiwan. Trump’s success can go far to contain the real threat — the Chinese Communist Party’s (CCP) surge to hegemony — while offering expanded defensive opportunities for Taiwan. In a stunning affirmation of the CCP policy of “forceful reunification,” an obscene euphemism for the invasion of Taiwan and the destruction of its democracy, on March 13, 2024, the People’s Liberation Army’s (PLA) used Chinese social media platforms to show the first-time linkage of three new
Sasha B. Chhabra’s column (“Michelle Yeoh should no longer be welcome,” March 26, page 8) lamented an Instagram post by renowned actress Michelle Yeoh (楊紫瓊) about her recent visit to “Taipei, China.” It is Chhabra’s opinion that, in response to parroting Beijing’s propaganda about the status of Taiwan, Yeoh should be banned from entering this nation and her films cut off from funding by government-backed agencies, as well as disqualified from competing in the Golden Horse Awards. She and other celebrities, he wrote, must be made to understand “that there are consequences for their actions if they become political pawns of
RSS