Pssst. Don’t spread it around too much, because there’s still a month to go and I don’t want to jinx things — but substance is in this year. You, I know, think US presidential elections are always decided by silly or superficial or out-and-out false representations and aspersions. Former US vice president Al Gore sighed too much in a debate and wasn’t the sort of fellow you’d like to have a beer with. US President George W Bush never sighed once, as far as anyone could tell, and was the sort you’d like to have a beer with (even though he didn’t drink beer). Senator John Kerry seemed so French and effete. He windsurfed. And he didn’t save all those men during the Vietnam War.
Little glimmers of substance have usually shown through. In 2004, for instance, a still-significant percentage of US voters remained jittery about a second large-scale terrorist attack on US soil. Bush ran as the man who had prevented that from happening and argued that he was more trustworthy on this matter than Kerry. And former US president Bill Clinton withstood an intensive barrage of over-the-top attacks and stayed focused on the economy.
Superficialities and attacks, though, usually dominate. In fact, more than a few liberals have spent the last four years trying to persuade Democrats to be every bit as superficial and nasty as the Republicans are at election time. But this year, something feels different. Voters are actually paying closer attention to issues.
It is the result, no doubt, of the US being in terrible shape right now. It tends to focus the mind. The economy is terrible. The stock market is terrible. Indicators of general societal well-being, like healthcare and pensions, are terrible. Our standing in the world is terrible. The conditions in Afghanistan are terrible. The situation in Iraq is improved but was so terrible for so long that people just basically want out.
We are a country in decline. The decline is the result of the policies of the last eight years. No candidate for president can utter the sentence “we are a country in decline.” The US’ central myth about itself is that, unlike Rome or Austria-Hungary or an earlier Britain, we are impervious to time’s vicissitudes and will always be numero uno. People now are worried that underneath that bravado, maybe we won’t be.
And so, substance matters. The public responses to the financial meltdown and the first two debates make this evident.
When the Wall Street crisis hit, Senator John McCain erupted with lots of bluster about how he was going to crack down on the fatcats and the greed heads. He “suspended” his campaign to return to Washington to handle the problem. He called Senator Barack Obama green and a hypocrite. In other words, he was superficial and aggressive in precisely the way that usually works in presidential campaigns. But he lost the argument — polls before the Wall Street crisis showed him closing the gap with Obama on the question of who can better handle the economy. That gap is now wider than ever.
Obama, by contrast, stayed calm, didn’t attack McCain’s stunt and at press conferences listed the specific items he needed to see in the bail-out bill. He was talking with congressional leaders and the Treasury secretary about these substantive points. The distinction between the two was clear.
Likewise with the debates. McCain has more zingers and one-liners than Obama and generally speaking is the aggressor. And Alaska Governor Sarah Palin had far more of a folksy approach than Senator Joe Biden did. One-liners, aggression and emotive warmth are supposed to win these contests, we are told. But polls shows that voters think Obama and Biden won the debates.
The Republicans can’t win on substance. Most of their positions are too unpopular. They know this, and this is why they lie, like Palin did during her debate, about leading the state of Alaska to divest of investments that could benefit the Sudanese government. It turns out that her administration opposed such divestment when it mattered and that she finally told a legislator or two she was for it — after it was too late for the legislature to act.
So in this closing month, they will do what they know how to do. Republican operatives told the Washington Post that they will spend the remaining days attacking Obama’s character. Meanwhile, independent conservative groups are bound to spread all manner of disinformation.
We’ve seen lies like these work before. But what we haven’t seen before is basically 80 percent of US adults feeling this miserably about their country. If there’s ever going to be a circumstance when voters stay focused on the things that matter, this ought to be it.
Michael Tomasky is editor of Guardian America.
The Yomiuri Shimbun, the newspaper with the largest daily circulation in Japan, on Thursday last week published an article saying that an unidentified high-ranking Japanese official openly spoke of an analysis that the Chinese People’s Liberation Army (PLA) needs less than a week, not a month, to invade Taiwan with its amphibious forces. Reportedly, Japanese Prime Minister Fumio Kishida has already been advised of the analysis, which was based on the PLA’s military exercises last summer. A Yomiuri analysis of unclassified satellite photographs confirmed that the PLA has already begun necessary base repairs and maintenance, and is conducting amphibious operation exercises
On Thursday last week, European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen was re-elected in Strasbourg, France. Before her re-election she gave a speech to the European Parliament and published a document entitled “Europe’s Choice: Political Guidelines for the Next European Commission 2024-2029.” Her statement attracted headlines in Taipei and Beijing. In Taiwan, it was welcomed, whereas the Chinese Ministry of Foreign Affairs said the commission president was “playing with fire.” The part of her statement that sparked such different reactions was of course about Taiwan. Von der Leyen focused on the Indo-Pacific region in a way that previous European Commissions have not. She
When it comes to national security and foreign affairs, President William Lai (賴清德) has said he wants to maintain the same policies as his predecessor, Tsai Ing-wen (蔡英文). Unfortunately, he does not find himself in the same geopolitical circumstances as Tsai during her presidency. The loss of a legislative majority aside, the regional geopolitical situation is in a continuous state of flux. Regardless of the perception of the binary nature of the forces that conspire against or with Taiwan — the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) and the US — the actual situation is far more complex, as encapsulated by many
While new immigrants and their children born in Taiwan have grown to a population of more than 1 million, the legislature in a late-night session on Tuesday last week passed a basic act governing “new residents” to facilitate their integration into Taiwanese society. In addition to setting up a new special commission under the Executive Yuan to oversee new resident affairs and services, the act mandates that the government aid them with counseling, medical and maternity healthcare, employment rights protection, education, and cultural empowerment. It aims to protect their rights, help them obtain residency and integrate into a multicultural society in