A pioneering Chinese company is to market pasteurized Tibetan yak milk in Beijing, Shanghai and Guangzhou in the hope that it will become a new super-food in the world’s most populous country.
At 24 yuan (US$3.50) for a 250ml carton, Feifan — meaning “uncommonly good” — costs several times as much as cow’s milk.
“It’s very natural, green, pure and high-quality. That’s our big selling point — we aim at the high-end market,” said Ding Pengcheng of the Treasure of the Plateau Yak Milk Company.
Over the next three years, the firm is to spend millions to crack the domestic and international markets, with the help of state investment. Yaks produce fewer than 300 liters of milk a year, while cows yield 35 times as much. The firm pays Tibetan farmers 16 yuan or more per liter, eight times the price of standard milk.
The China Nutrition Society, a Ministry of Health-backed research institute, claims the amino acids, calcium and vitamin A in yak milk are considerably higher than in cow’s milk, though its appeal depends as much on the mystique of its origins as its nutritional qualities. Feifan is undergoing extra safety checks because of China’s recent milk contamination scandal. Yet in the long run such concerns could boost the desire for products that combine modern hygiene with unsullied, back-to-the-land imagery.
Tsering Droma is a typical Tibetan herder who can now look forward to tapping the Chinese market. Born into a herding family, she tends 30 yaks on steep slopes near the Karola pass.
The animals are central to Tibetan culture. Their butter is melted into tea and fuels the lamps that light monasteries. Dung keeps fires burning; bones are carved into beads. Yaks provide Droma and her family with everything they need.
“Female yaks are very important to us: We can get milk, make butter and cheese and get extra money by selling it. For the males, they can be used for transport,” she said. “We can sell the yak skins and the meat and hair. All the parts can be sold. Then we buy things like grain.”
But 160km away in Lhasa, the Treasure of the Plateau company is transforming this hand-to-mouth livelihood into a serious business. It is marketing the traditional staple as a super-food for aspirational middle-class households across China and beyond.
Steam seeps from the pipes of its Tetrapak production line as it heats liter after liter of milk to 130°C.
In 2003, the firm sold just over 2 million yuan in goods; this year it is on course to bring in up to 90 million yuan. Each day the local market consumes between 3 tonnes and 6 tonnes of its yogurt.
The company’s first batches of milk arrived in bowls carried on herders’ backs, and often with the unwelcome additions of insects and yak hair.
Now they come in clean containers, usually delivered by motorbike or car — proof, the company says, that it is raising local incomes.
That does not make it immune from controversy surrounding economic development. Its expansion into markets around China would be all but impossible without the Tibet-Qinghai rail line, which critics say has damaged the environment and accelerated the erosion of Tibetan culture. Seventy percent of the firm’s 110 staff are Tibetan, but only a few are in senior posts.
“Our company carries out a lot of training for our Tibetan staff, but most of them don’t have higher, college-level education,” Ding said.
At the least, the company and the government money behind it are supporting long-impoverished herders. The authorities have been heavily criticized for forcibly settling nomads. But this state investment is helping some to increase their incomes without having to abandon their heritage.
It is what officials call “development with Tibetan characteristics.” And yaks are as Tibetan as they come.
Concerns that the US might abandon Taiwan are often overstated. While US President Donald Trump’s handling of Ukraine raised unease in Taiwan, it is crucial to recognize that Taiwan is not Ukraine. Under Trump, the US views Ukraine largely as a European problem, whereas the Indo-Pacific region remains its primary geopolitical focus. Taipei holds immense strategic value for Washington and is unlikely to be treated as a bargaining chip in US-China relations. Trump’s vision of “making America great again” would be directly undermined by any move to abandon Taiwan. Despite the rhetoric of “America First,” the Trump administration understands the necessity of
In an article published on this page on Tuesday, Kaohsiung-based journalist Julien Oeuillet wrote that “legions of people worldwide would care if a disaster occurred in South Korea or Japan, but the same people would not bat an eyelid if Taiwan disappeared.” That is quite a statement. We are constantly reading about the importance of Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co (TSMC), hailed in Taiwan as the nation’s “silicon shield” protecting it from hostile foreign forces such as the Chinese Communist Party (CCP), and so crucial to the global supply chain for semiconductors that its loss would cost the global economy US$1
US President Donald Trump’s challenge to domestic American economic-political priorities, and abroad to the global balance of power, are not a threat to the security of Taiwan. Trump’s success can go far to contain the real threat — the Chinese Communist Party’s (CCP) surge to hegemony — while offering expanded defensive opportunities for Taiwan. In a stunning affirmation of the CCP policy of “forceful reunification,” an obscene euphemism for the invasion of Taiwan and the destruction of its democracy, on March 13, 2024, the People’s Liberation Army’s (PLA) used Chinese social media platforms to show the first-time linkage of three new
Sasha B. Chhabra’s column (“Michelle Yeoh should no longer be welcome,” March 26, page 8) lamented an Instagram post by renowned actress Michelle Yeoh (楊紫瓊) about her recent visit to “Taipei, China.” It is Chhabra’s opinion that, in response to parroting Beijing’s propaganda about the status of Taiwan, Yeoh should be banned from entering this nation and her films cut off from funding by government-backed agencies, as well as disqualified from competing in the Golden Horse Awards. She and other celebrities, he wrote, must be made to understand “that there are consequences for their actions if they become political pawns of
RSS