I don’t know when Taiwan’s TV news reporters started having to put themselves in danger to stimulate ratings. The danger is designed to keep viewers on the edge of their seats.
Such reporting should not exist in a civilized country. Take flood news for example. We see reporters standing in waist-deep water while delivering live news.
Sometimes they squat in the water to exaggerate the depth. During landslide coverage, we see reporters walking into danger zones to show the horror of such disasters.
When Super Typhoon Jangmi hit Taiwan, we once again saw TV stations sending female reporters to seashores, riversides, open ground or dangerous hills.
They could hardly stand upright and were exposed to dangerously strong winds, turbulent waves, floods and mudslides. When a natural disaster occurs, the government warns the public to stay away from disaster areas to avoid injury.
To inform the public of the scope and damage of a disaster, reporters risk injury reporting at the scene. But they take the risk because they have no choice. It is unethical for them to risk their lives or even make false reports in order to boost ratings.
If reporting at the scene is the only way to cover a disaster, shouldn’t reporters also drink toxic milk until they get kidney stones in order to show the negative effect of melamine to viewers?
By risking the lives of reporters, TV stations may be breaking laws concerning manslaughter and injury through negligence, stated in Articles 15, 276 and 284 of the Criminal Code (刑法). Article 8 of the Labor Standards Law (勞動基準法) stipulates that “an employer shall take precautions for his employees against occupational hazards and set up proper work environments and welfare facilities.
“All safety, health, and welfare matters related thereto shall be governed by the provisions of applicable laws,” it says.
Why don’t the authorities prevent this from happening and why don’t the local journalists’ associations stage a protest?
Are the Taiwanese people really so cruel as to take TV news reporters as easy targets?
In October 2004, Taiwan Television (TTV) cameraman Alex Ping (平宗正), 31, drowned while reporting the launch of a flood-diversion tunnel as Typhoon Nock-Ten hit Taiwan.
The incident served as a warning. How can TV stations overlook the safety of their reporters?
Kuo Cheng-deng is chairman of the Healthy Taiwan Society.
Translated by Eddy Chang
For three years and three months, Taiwan’s bid to join the Comprehensive and Progressive Agreement for Trans-Pacific Partnership (CPTPP) has remained stalled. On Nov. 29, members meeting in Vancouver agreed to establish a working group for Costa Rica’s entry — the fifth applicant in line — but not for Taiwan. As Taiwan’s prospects for CPTPP membership fade due to “politically sensitive issues,” what strategy should it adopt to overcome this politically motivated economic exclusion? The situation is not entirely dim; these challenges offer an opportunity to reimagine the export-driven country’s international trade strategy. Following the US’ withdrawal from the Trans-Pacific Partnership
Two major Chinese Communist Party (CCP)-People’s Liberation Army (PLA) power demonstrations in November 2024 highlight the urgency for Taiwan to pursue a military buildup and deterrence agenda that can take back control of its destiny. First, the CCP-PLA’s planned future for Taiwan of war, bloody suppression, and use as a base for regional aggression was foreshadowed by the 9th and largest PLA-Russia Joint Bomber Exercise of Nov. 29 and 30. It was double that of previous bomber exercises, with both days featuring combined combat strike groups of PLA Air Force and Russian bombers escorted by PLAAF and Russian fighters, airborne early warning
Since the end of former president Ma Ying-jeou’s (馬英九) administration, the Ma Ying-jeou Foundation has taken Taiwanese students to visit China and invited Chinese students to Taiwan. Ma calls those activities “cross-strait exchanges,” yet the trips completely avoid topics prohibited by the Chinese Communist Party (CCP), such as democracy, freedom and human rights — all of which are universal values. During the foundation’s most recent Chinese student tour group, a Fudan University student used terms such as “China, Taipei” and “the motherland” when discussing Taiwan’s recent baseball victory. The group’s visit to Zhongshan Girls’ High School also received prominent coverage in
India and China have taken a significant step toward disengagement of their military troops after reaching an agreement on the long-standing disputes in the Galwan Valley. For government officials and policy experts, this move is welcome, signaling the potential resolution of the enduring border issues between the two countries. However, it is crucial to consider the potential impact of this disengagement on India’s relationship with Taiwan. Over the past few years, there have been important developments in India-Taiwan relations, including exchanges between heads of state soon after Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi’s third electoral victory. This raises the pressing question: