Invited to Helsinki, Finland, to present my work on the dreams of university students in Taiwan, I took the ferry on Friday over to Tallinn, the capital of Estonia, to spend a day wandering around one of the best-preserved medieval cities in Europe.
Luckily, it turned out to be a rainy day — otherwise I wouldn’t have sought shelter in a seemingly uninteresting little museum on a narrow cobblestone street, where I stumbled upon an exhibit that brought tears to my eyes.
Replace the People’s Republic of China for the Union of Soviet Socialist Republics, and Taiwan for Estonia — the story is the same: A giant country tries to gobble up a tiny one on its border.
Estonia has another element in common with Taiwan — its people love to sing.
The museum was holding an exhibit that documented in pictures how the Estonians got the world to recognize them as a nation by singing, in what has been called “the Singing Revolution.”
The Russians sent in tanks.
The Estonians placed huge boulders on the roads to block the way.
The tanks had to withdraw because the little nation captured the heart of the world with its solidarity song.
Russia relinquished its claims. The Estonians toppled Lenin’s statue.
One man climbed the pedestal and raised his arms in a gesture that expressed the feeling of a nation.
A photographer captured the moment for all time.
There is a big lesson in this for Taiwan.
But the question is: Can 23 million Taiwanese do what 1.5 million Estonians did?
And can they do it now while there is still time?
Do the Taiwanese have what it takes?
Do they deeply feel that Taiwan really is a separate nation?
Or do the people of Taiwan prefer to be swallowed up by China and digested into something that can have neither the significance nor the destiny that history has thrust upon this island nation?
Do Taiwanese parents care more about how much money they can grab today than they do for the future of their children tomorrow?
Are they that much like the late dictator Chiang Kai-shek (蔣介石) and his family?
I raised these points because I feel now is the time in which answers must emerge; and because, standing there in that small, faraway museum, it struck me that the way the Estonians sang their nation to freedom is an option for Taiwan that could win it the sympathy of world organizations that it hasn’t been able to obtain by any other method.
I work with the dreams of young Taiwanese college students.
I have seen inside their hearts and minds.
I know them to be world-class as a group, the equal of young people anywhere.
Though Taiwanese are perhaps not ethnically, linguistically or culturally separate from the mainland Chinese — they are a larger people, even though smaller in number; and they aspire to a higher destiny, even though on a smaller scale.
The world needs Taiwan and Taiwan needs a world that can see this.
As I stood before the museum exhibit with tears in my eyes, an old Estonian man approached me.
“Where are you from?” he asked.
“Taiwan,” I said.
“Oh,” he immediately understood.
“You are like us. We have Russia. You have China. The same story,” he said.
The old man was right.
Perhaps political leaders in Taiwan have forgotten that they have a higher mission than lining their pockets with cash.
This little nation is right now being ensnared in wording and behaviors that bit by bit will cause it to be engulfed by its huge neighbor next door.
Our young people stand to lose their nationhood and their opportunity for freedom and self-expression unless we act now.
What better way than following the Estonian example and organizing mass singing events — in English and Chinese — that can enable Taiwan’s young and old alike to come together and show the world they are a people unique among peoples, with a voice all their own.
If that voice can show it deserves to be heard, it will be heard.
The world organizations will listen. This doesn’t need to be restricted to Taiwan.
Sizeable student and resident populations of Taiwanese all over the US, Europe and elsewhere can join in — and carry the song of our people, and their dream of freedom and democracy, around the world.
If little Estonia, with only 1.5 million people could do it, why can’t we, with over fourteen times the population?
The only possible reason would be that we don’t care enough, and so don’t deserve a destiny other than the one that the Chinese Communist Party allows us to have. The Chinese hands in our pockets will then be much bigger, more numerous and greedier.
William Stimson is a US writer based in Helsinki, Finland.
A chip made by Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co (TSMC) was found on a Huawei Technologies Co artificial intelligence (AI) processor, indicating a possible breach of US export restrictions that have been in place since 2019 on sensitive tech to the Chinese firm and others. The incident has triggered significant concern in the IT industry, as it appears that proxy buyers are acting on behalf of restricted Chinese companies to bypass the US rules, which are intended to protect its national security. Canada-based research firm TechInsights conducted a die analysis of the Huawei Ascend 910B AI Trainer, releasing its findings on Oct.
In honor of President Jimmy Carter’s 100th birthday, my longtime friend and colleague John Tkacik wrote an excellent op-ed reassessing Carter’s derecognition of Taipei. But I would like to add my own thoughts on this often-misunderstood president. During Carter’s single term as president of the United States from 1977 to 1981, despite numerous foreign policy and domestic challenges, he is widely recognized for brokering the historic 1978 Camp David Accords that ended the state of war between Egypt and Israel after more than three decades of hostilities. It is considered one of the most significant diplomatic achievements of the 20th century.
As the war in Burma stretches into its 76th year, China continues to play both sides. Beijing backs the junta, which seized power in the 2021 coup, while also funding some of the resistance groups fighting the regime. Some suggest that Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) is hedging his bets, positioning China to side with the victors regardless of the outcome. However, a more accurate explanation is that China is acting pragmatically to safeguard its investments and ensure the steady flow of natural resources and energy for its economy. China’s primary interest is stability and supporting the junta initially seemed like the best
Numerous expert analyses characterize today’s US presidential election as a risk for Taiwan, given that the two major candidates, US Vice President Kamala Harris and former US president Donald Trump, are perceived to possess divergent foreign policy perspectives. If Harris is elected, many presume that the US would maintain its existing relationship with Taiwan, as established through the American Institute in Taiwan, and would continue to sell Taiwan weapons and equipment to help it defend itself against China. Under the administration of US President Joe Biden, whose political views Harris shares, the US on Oct. 25 authorized arms transfers to Taiwan, another
RSS