The freeze imposed by the administration of US President George W. Bush on arms sales to Taiwan, now lifted for the most part, had nothing to do with congressional procedure, because the Pentagon’s Defense Security Cooperation Agency had already notified Congress of arms sales to France, Pakistan, Turkey and Saudi Arabia.
Even though it had lost confidence in former president Chen Shui-bian’s (陳水扁) government, the Bush administration still agreed to plans last year to sell twelve P-3C marine patrol aircraft and 144 SM-2 missiles to help Taiwan defend against cruise missiles and aircraft threats.
The US government’s subsequent freeze on the arms deal that was eventually supported by the government of President Ma Ying-jeou (馬英九) then proved that the US had lost confidence in the Ma administration.
When the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) was in opposition, its legislators and their allies vehemently opposed what they called an overpriced arms procurement deal. Not long after the Ma administration took power, there were rumors that it told the US government that it would not purchase arms from Washington.
Any such actions may have infuriated the Bush administration, leading to its decision to freeze the deal. However, the fundamental reason for this decision was that the US government had lost confidence in Ma’s security agenda.
Despite the fact that the US maintains a close relationship with China on trade and international politics, US policies toward Asia have always shown that the US sees China as a potential opponent in the region.
Thus, in strategic terms, not only does the US government cooperate with Japan while building its relations with other Asian allies, it also maintains forward-deployed forces in the Pacific region to contain China’s ambition to expand militarily.
Given this state of affairs, the US would be hurting itself if high-tech arms and technology sold to Taiwan eventually fell into Chinese hands.
Although the US is happy to see cross-strait relations remain peaceful and stable, it has never wanted Taiwan to become dependent on China.
However, the Ma administration’s blind tilting toward China has caused the US to worry that Ma is likely to seek unification.
Thus in late August, American Institute in Taiwan Chairman Raymond Burghardt said that Taipei should refrain from implying that China has sovereignty over Taiwan and instead insist that China not have a final say on whether Taiwan can participate in international activities. It was the first time that the US government had extended a strong warning of this nature to Taiwan.
The Bush administration’s freeze of the arms procurement deal was a second warning. If there is to be a third, it will be a strikeout, and this is something that the Ma administration should note well.
Chen Kuo-hsiung is vice general-secretary of World United Formosans for Independence and general-secretary of the Taiwan National Security Institute.
TRANSLATED BY TED YANG
For three years and three months, Taiwan’s bid to join the Comprehensive and Progressive Agreement for Trans-Pacific Partnership (CPTPP) has remained stalled. On Nov. 29, members meeting in Vancouver agreed to establish a working group for Costa Rica’s entry — the fifth applicant in line — but not for Taiwan. As Taiwan’s prospects for CPTPP membership fade due to “politically sensitive issues,” what strategy should it adopt to overcome this politically motivated economic exclusion? The situation is not entirely dim; these challenges offer an opportunity to reimagine the export-driven country’s international trade strategy. Following the US’ withdrawal from the Trans-Pacific Partnership
Two major Chinese Communist Party (CCP)-People’s Liberation Army (PLA) power demonstrations in November 2024 highlight the urgency for Taiwan to pursue a military buildup and deterrence agenda that can take back control of its destiny. First, the CCP-PLA’s planned future for Taiwan of war, bloody suppression, and use as a base for regional aggression was foreshadowed by the 9th and largest PLA-Russia Joint Bomber Exercise of Nov. 29 and 30. It was double that of previous bomber exercises, with both days featuring combined combat strike groups of PLA Air Force and Russian bombers escorted by PLAAF and Russian fighters, airborne early warning
Since the end of former president Ma Ying-jeou’s (馬英九) administration, the Ma Ying-jeou Foundation has taken Taiwanese students to visit China and invited Chinese students to Taiwan. Ma calls those activities “cross-strait exchanges,” yet the trips completely avoid topics prohibited by the Chinese Communist Party (CCP), such as democracy, freedom and human rights — all of which are universal values. During the foundation’s most recent Chinese student tour group, a Fudan University student used terms such as “China, Taipei” and “the motherland” when discussing Taiwan’s recent baseball victory. The group’s visit to Zhongshan Girls’ High School also received prominent coverage in
Late on Tuesday evening, South Korean President Yoon Suk-yeol declared martial law. A BBC analysis cited as reasons the opposition parties’ majority in the National Assembly, their continued boycott of the national budget and the impeachment of key officials and prosecutors, leading to frequent government gridlock. During the years that Taiwan and South Korea traveled the road to democratization, our countries hit many potholes. Taiwan cannot return to the Martial Law era. Despite the similarities in our authoritarian past, Yoon’s political travails are far removed from the issues Taiwan faces. Yoon’s actions are a wake-up call to the world about
RSS