The Presidential Office’s economic advisory panel held an extraordinary meeting on Tuesday after US legislators dealt a blow to the planned bank bailout, sparking renewed jitters among investors worldwide. At the meeting, led by Vice President Vincent Siew (蕭萬長), it was suggested that the inheritance and gift taxes be lowered and a sovereign wealth fund established. These moves would not be very useful in dealing with the crisis, while the fund proposal in particular has set off heated debate.
Sovereign wealth funds are increasingly common. Singapore, China, South Korea, the Middle East and US states including Alaska are among those that have created such funds. Taiwan can learn from the experience of Singapore’s Temasek Holdings, which established such a fund to attract international investment to boost GDP. Now, with the difficulties faced by international investment companies and lenders, a sovereign wealth fund could be a way to secure valuable assets.
But establishing the fund is still in the brainstorming phase. Details such as the fund’s goals, capital sources, structure, operation and regulation have barely been mentioned. It is therefore no wonder that the Council for Economic Planning and Development made clear on Wednesday that it was still too early to establish a sovereign wealth fund, although it said it was an option to consider further down the road.
Taiwan has two national funds — a National Stabilization Fund aimed at stabilizing the stock market and a National Development Fund aimed at funding venture capital companies. Further discussion is required to decide how these two funds and a sovereign wealth fund would interact and what purpose each would serve.
A sovereign wealth fund is composed of assets such as foreign exchange reserves, stocks, bonds and other financial instruments. If the government diverts funds from its foreign reserves to establish the fund, there would be a conflict between the conservative management of foreign reserves and the fund’s goal of making a profit, making management quite difficult. Raising private capital would restrict the scope of the fund, as would the investment targets and potential profits.
The international community is wary of state-owned investment funds. Considering the unique diplomatic challenges the nation faces, it could very well encounter difficulties in buying strategic resources such as petroleum and minerals because of pressure from China. Taiwan could also face problems in large corporate mergers and business acquisitions. These potential obstacles deserve consideration.
A government-managed sovereign wealth fund, like a state-run business, would be unable to free itself from government conservativeness, legal restrictions and personnel issues. In addition, a set of detailed regulations must be crafted to ensure transparent management, prevent political intervention and insider trading, and build internal and external supervisory mechanisms. Otherwise, disputes could ensue over the fund when too many people want a piece of the action. This would greatly undermine the benefits of the process.
There are many problems associated with establishing the fund that have yet to be broached. The key to remember is that this issue has nothing to do with solving the financial crisis: There is no incentive to rush. Let’s first solve the problems at hand and give due consideration to Siew’s concepts for Taiwan’s future when the immediate crisis is behind us.
Why is Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) not a “happy camper” these days regarding Taiwan? Taiwanese have not become more “CCP friendly” in response to the Chinese Communist Party’s (CCP) use of spies and graft by the United Front Work Department, intimidation conducted by the People’s Liberation Army (PLA) and the Armed Police/Coast Guard, and endless subversive political warfare measures, including cyber-attacks, economic coercion, and diplomatic isolation. The percentage of Taiwanese that prefer the status quo or prefer moving towards independence continues to rise — 76 percent as of December last year. According to National Chengchi University (NCCU) polling, the Taiwanese
It would be absurd to claim to see a silver lining behind every US President Donald Trump cloud. Those clouds are too many, too dark and too dangerous. All the same, viewed from a domestic political perspective, there is a clear emerging UK upside to Trump’s efforts at crashing the post-Cold War order. It might even get a boost from Thursday’s Washington visit by British Prime Minister Keir Starmer. In July last year, when Starmer became prime minister, the Labour Party was rigidly on the defensive about Europe. Brexit was seen as an electorally unstable issue for a party whose priority
US President Donald Trump is systematically dismantling the network of multilateral institutions, organizations and agreements that have helped prevent a third world war for more than 70 years. Yet many governments are twisting themselves into knots trying to downplay his actions, insisting that things are not as they seem and that even if they are, confronting the menace in the White House simply is not an option. Disagreement must be carefully disguised to avoid provoking his wrath. For the British political establishment, the convenient excuse is the need to preserve the UK’s “special relationship” with the US. Following their White House
US President Donald Trump’s return to the White House has brought renewed scrutiny to the Taiwan-US semiconductor relationship with his claim that Taiwan “stole” the US chip business and threats of 100 percent tariffs on foreign-made processors. For Taiwanese and industry leaders, understanding those developments in their full context is crucial while maintaining a clear vision of Taiwan’s role in the global technology ecosystem. The assertion that Taiwan “stole” the US’ semiconductor industry fundamentally misunderstands the evolution of global technology manufacturing. Over the past four decades, Taiwan’s semiconductor industry, led by Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co (TSMC), has grown through legitimate means
RSS