A man called horse
The surname of President Ma Ying-jeou (馬英九) means “horse.”
A few months into his tenure, it has become increasingly justifiable to compare this horse of undetermined pedigree to that historical quadruped of ill repute: the Trojan horse.
The breed uncertainty here can be attributed to the lingering controversy surrounding the Hong Kong-born, Taiwanese president’s US green card and naturalization status.
The Trojans in Homer’s Odyssey had an advantage Taiwanese do not of at least knowing the origin of their horse. They knew those pouring out from the wooden horse were Greek soldiers, while Taiwanese have a hard time recognizing Ma’s intention.
This is despite the fact that the Ma administration is busying itself with whittling away at the nation’s sovereignty.
Ma and company often operate in stretched gray areas of the Constitution, while the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) controlled legislature not only forsakes its role as the government watchdog but regularly turns a blind eye to Ma’s shenanigans. As a result, Ma’s representatives routinely discuss cross-strait affairs with Beijing officials behind closed doors and sign memorandums sans legislative oversight, much less subject to public scrutiny.
But matters will soon come to a head, so to speak, thanks to subjects of momentous consequences that loom on the horizon.
A test balloon has been floated by both Beijing and Ma administration regarding the prospect of inking a Closer Economic Partnership Arrangement (CEPA) between China and Taiwan. Up to this point, similar documents with the distinctive “one nation, twosystems” implication have only been signed between Beijing and its territories, Macau and Hong Kong.
Given that both China and Taiwan are members of the WTO, the content of the CEPA would have to be disclosed to the global trade body even if it is currently undemocratically wrapped in a blanket of silence.
That means the Taiwanese public would eventually know, albeit belatedly, the extent of the duplicity.
Ma had promised during his campaign for presidency that Taiwan’s future would be determined by the 23 million Taiwanese. His presidential mandate does not include conduct that would run counter to that commitment to democracy.
A similar situation arises from the seemingly imminent importation of two giant pandas as China’s “gift” to Taiwan.
The treaty of the UN’s Convention on International Trade in Endangered Species (CITES) of Wild Fauna and Flora bears signatures from 173 countries, including China. It stipulates stringent restrictions on moving pandas, listed under Appendix I of CITES, from their natural habitats in China to zoos in foreign countries: Only loans with hefty fees — but no trade — is permitted.
Beijing has dangled that same immensely popular “gift” in front of Taiwanese before, but the former Democratic Progressive Party government turned down the offer on the grounds that it is difficult to provide a healthy environment for the pandas. The real reason, however, was its rejection of Beijing’s ruse to make Taiwan appear as a region of China.
Beijing and Ma’s perfidious exploitation of a noble cause — one aimed at protecting endangered animals — to advance their unification agenda should remind Taiwanese of the precarious state of their own nation.
Only through a great, concerted and timely effort can Taiwanese prevent their democracy from faring worse than the endangered species listed in CITES. No less is needed to keep Taiwanese sovereignty from being traded away from its native abode, a fate forbidden to befall species placed on Appendix I that include giant pandas.
Huang Jei-hsuan
Los Angeles, California
In their recent op-ed “Trump Should Rein In Taiwan” in Foreign Policy magazine, Christopher Chivvis and Stephen Wertheim argued that the US should pressure President William Lai (賴清德) to “tone it down” to de-escalate tensions in the Taiwan Strait — as if Taiwan’s words are more of a threat to peace than Beijing’s actions. It is an old argument dressed up in new concern: that Washington must rein in Taipei to avoid war. However, this narrative gets it backward. Taiwan is not the problem; China is. Calls for a so-called “grand bargain” with Beijing — where the US pressures Taiwan into concessions
The term “assassin’s mace” originates from Chinese folklore, describing a concealed weapon used by a weaker hero to defeat a stronger adversary with an unexpected strike. In more general military parlance, the concept refers to an asymmetric capability that targets a critical vulnerability of an adversary. China has found its modern equivalent of the assassin’s mace with its high-altitude electromagnetic pulse (HEMP) weapons, which are nuclear warheads detonated at a high altitude, emitting intense electromagnetic radiation capable of disabling and destroying electronics. An assassin’s mace weapon possesses two essential characteristics: strategic surprise and the ability to neutralize a core dependency.
Chinese President and Chinese Communist Party (CCP) Chairman Xi Jinping (習近平) said in a politburo speech late last month that his party must protect the “bottom line” to prevent systemic threats. The tone of his address was grave, revealing deep anxieties about China’s current state of affairs. Essentially, what he worries most about is systemic threats to China’s normal development as a country. The US-China trade war has turned white hot: China’s export orders have plummeted, Chinese firms and enterprises are shutting up shop, and local debt risks are mounting daily, causing China’s economy to flag externally and hemorrhage internally. China’s
US President Donald Trump and Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) were born under the sign of Gemini. Geminis are known for their intelligence, creativity, adaptability and flexibility. It is unlikely, then, that the trade conflict between the US and China would escalate into a catastrophic collision. It is more probable that both sides would seek a way to de-escalate, paving the way for a Trump-Xi summit that allows the global economy some breathing room. Practically speaking, China and the US have vulnerabilities, and a prolonged trade war would be damaging for both. In the US, the electoral system means that public opinion
RSS