While news about the imports of melamine-contaminated milk powder produced by the Sanlu Group and 21 other Chinese companies and tainted powdered non-dairy creamer manufactured in Shandong Province caused a panic in Taiwan, the Council of Agriculture said last Monday that 18 brands of locally produced fresh milk and raw milk were all safe and melamine-free. The announcement came as an unexpected ray of light amid public fears over dairy products. It revived consumer confidence in food safety and showed that safe products are made in Taiwan by Taiwanese companies.
The logo “Made in Taiwan (MIT)” has never drawn as much attention as it does now. Twenty years ago, this brand was seen as a name for cheap products, but it has since experienced splendid times thanks to Taiwan’s leading role in the electronic original equipment manufacturing industry. However, as we all have become dependent on guarantees of food safety, it would be well worth our while to initiate a meaningful civil campaign — “I love MIT.”
The scandal over tainted Chinese milk powder is not only a problem of managing the cross-strait trade in food products but an international problem because of the globalization of food production.
Not only did the US and Canada immediately ban all dairy product imports from China, but the WHO publicly denounced China for failing to alert the international community sooner and admit that the situation could be more serious than originally thought.
Almost all Chinese dairy products containing animal or plant protein have been affected. Concerns have been aroused that Chinese processed food products that have been sold to every part of the world such as cookies, cakes, pudding, candies and instant coffee may also have been tainted. This is why all countries are on the alert.
Taiwan’s government, which has placed high priority on the improvement of its political and economic relations with China, was panned for its slow handling of the crisis.
It is now taking belated precautions by replacing the head of the Department of Health, examining gaps in food management regulations and investigating the failure to fully implement source of origin labeling.
But the government should consider the issue from a wider perspective, thinking about how to take advantage of the current situation to revive the local traditional food sector.
The public should learn from the toxic milk powder incident that it is a glaring mistake to decide whether an industry is of significance simply by looking at output value. Pinning all our hopes on the electronics sector and high-tech industries is not enough to bring peace and prosperity to the public. The government should immediately consider how to extend capital, human resources and technological support.
Concrete actions could include the Ministry of Economic Affairs allocating more resources toward technological development and research projects for the food and textile industries in order to advance their technologies and encourage them to build their own brands and enhancing their marketing skills. The Industrial Technology Research Institute should also lead experts in giving more assistance to traditional industries.
In terms of improving the managerial environment of the traditional sector, the government should, if necessary, not be afraid of leveling anti-dumping charges under international law against a large number of cheap Chinese and Vietnamese products imported under the WTO framework.
It should not hesitate to take action because it fears compromising trade relations with China.
A good example of the need for such action was the importing of Chinese cheap towels that disrupted local markets and caused substantive damage to Yunlin County towel makers in 2006.
Finally, regulations about source of origin labeling and declarations of ingredients on Chinese food products are not strict enough. The main reason for this problem is that many major Taiwanese companies have established factories in China to reduce costs and then sell their products back to Taiwan. These vested interest groups are an impediment to legislation and law enforcement.
To protect public safety and health, the government must eliminate undue intervention and lay down clear regulations requiring that the origin of ingredients be shown on the labels of processed products. To make possible strict controls, it should also charge importers with the responsibility to control product flows and levy appropriate fines for failing to do so.
Most importantly, low prices are the only incentive to buy Chinese. With the gloomy economy and rising commodity prices, company management and consumer behavior have been changing. The public should urge the government to adopt effective measures to boost the economy and control consumer prices.
However, the public should also support locally produced products to help domestic companies and promote “Made in Taiwan” products.
As Taiwan developed from a poor nation to a wealthy one, from a coarse one to an advanced one, it has built its own brand. Following the Chinese toxic milk powder scare, it is clear that Taiwan-made products were successful because they had no Chinese ingredients; they are “China-free.”
The lesson to be drawn is simple in its profundity: MIT is the best guarantee for TaiwaAn remaining at ease and secure.
TRANSLATED BY TED YANG
Concerns that the US might abandon Taiwan are often overstated. While US President Donald Trump’s handling of Ukraine raised unease in Taiwan, it is crucial to recognize that Taiwan is not Ukraine. Under Trump, the US views Ukraine largely as a European problem, whereas the Indo-Pacific region remains its primary geopolitical focus. Taipei holds immense strategic value for Washington and is unlikely to be treated as a bargaining chip in US-China relations. Trump’s vision of “making America great again” would be directly undermined by any move to abandon Taiwan. Despite the rhetoric of “America First,” the Trump administration understands the necessity of
In an article published on this page on Tuesday, Kaohsiung-based journalist Julien Oeuillet wrote that “legions of people worldwide would care if a disaster occurred in South Korea or Japan, but the same people would not bat an eyelid if Taiwan disappeared.” That is quite a statement. We are constantly reading about the importance of Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co (TSMC), hailed in Taiwan as the nation’s “silicon shield” protecting it from hostile foreign forces such as the Chinese Communist Party (CCP), and so crucial to the global supply chain for semiconductors that its loss would cost the global economy US$1
US President Donald Trump’s challenge to domestic American economic-political priorities, and abroad to the global balance of power, are not a threat to the security of Taiwan. Trump’s success can go far to contain the real threat — the Chinese Communist Party’s (CCP) surge to hegemony — while offering expanded defensive opportunities for Taiwan. In a stunning affirmation of the CCP policy of “forceful reunification,” an obscene euphemism for the invasion of Taiwan and the destruction of its democracy, on March 13, 2024, the People’s Liberation Army’s (PLA) used Chinese social media platforms to show the first-time linkage of three new
Sasha B. Chhabra’s column (“Michelle Yeoh should no longer be welcome,” March 26, page 8) lamented an Instagram post by renowned actress Michelle Yeoh (楊紫瓊) about her recent visit to “Taipei, China.” It is Chhabra’s opinion that, in response to parroting Beijing’s propaganda about the status of Taiwan, Yeoh should be banned from entering this nation and her films cut off from funding by government-backed agencies, as well as disqualified from competing in the Golden Horse Awards. She and other celebrities, he wrote, must be made to understand “that there are consequences for their actions if they become political pawns of
RSS