Sometimes people outside the US have views of US elections that are, at the least, different from those within and, more often, illuminating.
So it was this week with Kim Beazley, Australia’s onetime defense minister, deputy prime minister and leader of the Labor Party now in power under Australian Prime Minister Kevin Rudd. Beazley said that Senator John McCain, the Republican presidential candidate, and Senator Barack Obama, his Democratic opponent, might use similar words on US foreign policy but “the underlying premises and approaches might not be exactly the same.”
In an address at the East-West Center Beazley said that McCain’s view “is an extension in the new era of essentially the Cold War approach. That approach was about building structures to advance Western interests and contain potential military and ideological threats.”
In contrast, Beazley told a luncheon audience at the research and educational center in Honolulu, “Obama is the first presidential candidate free of intellectual involvement in that world [of the Cold War].”
Beazley, who spoke before Friday night’s McCain-Obama debate on foreign policy, suggested that Obama was problem-oriented, identifying an issue, then engaging partners to find a solution.
For Australia, long an ally of the US, the distinction was important, Beazley said.
“Australia wants the US to extend priority to engaging the challenges by what is undoubtedly the Asian century,” he said.
A McCain presidency would accept Australia for the ally it has been. An Obama presidency would require Australia to work harder to demonstrate its relevance to resolving problems.
Beazley, a jovial, outgoing politician who was careful not to take sides in the US election, said both candidates gave priority to the struggle with Islamic fundamentalist terror.
Moreover, “the new president will confront massive fiscal issues,” regardless of who is elected and that may require that budgets for defense capabilities be cut.
Beazley was in Honolulu for the Australian American Leadership Dialogue, an off-the-record gathering of political leaders, defense and foreign policy specialists, and scholars who advocate close relations between the two nations. He is slated to become chancellor of Australia National University in January.
“Both candidates have said things about the Australian relationship we couldn’t fault,” Beazley said.
In foreign policy objectives, he said, they “have reached toward the views being put forward by elder statesmen such as George Schultz, Henry Kissinger, William Perry and Senator [Sam] Nunn.”
Schultz and Kissinger were both Republican secretaries of state, Perry was a Democratic secretary of defense, and Nunn was a leading Democratic authority on defense.
Beazley contended, however, that US Secretary of Defense Robert Gates had recently set “a subtle new direction” in security posture that McCain or Obama would inherit as president.
“The strategic dynamic of the Asia-Pacific region is being driven by the ways in which the previously dominant power, the US, and the rising powers of China, India, and Japan are educating each other,” Beazley said.
The Australian said he was fascinated by Gates’s claim that the US has become a “resident power” in the western Pacific.
He quoted Gates as saying “there is sovereign American territory in the western Pacific from the Aleutian Islands all the way down to Guam,” the island 2,900km east of China, a potential rival of the US in that region.
Officers at the US Pacific Command’s headquarters in Honolulu said senior Chinese naval officers have told Admiral Timothy Keating, the Pacific Commander, that they planned to build aircraft carriers in the near future. When those warships are ready for sea duty, the Chinese said, perhaps the US should withdraw to the eastern Pacific while China patrolled the western Pacific.
Keating, the officers said, politely but firmly responded that the US would not retire from the western Pacific.
Beazley did little to conceal an Australian fear, one shared by most US allies in Asia and the Pacific, that the new administration in Washington would turn its back on them in favor of Europe and the Middle East.
“It behooves Australia,” Beazley said, “to devote particular intellectual effort to ensure that the increasing value of the alliance to its partner is not unnecessarily diminished.”
He took heart in that “McCain and Obama are men of the Pacific.”
Beazley noted that Obama was born in Hawaii and spent his childhood here and in Indonesia.
For McCain, “Hawaii was a staging point for the toughest conceivable crucible of an education in the region’s affairs as a fighter and prisoner of war in Vietnam.”
Richard Halloran is a writer based in Hawaii
Why is Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) not a “happy camper” these days regarding Taiwan? Taiwanese have not become more “CCP friendly” in response to the Chinese Communist Party’s (CCP) use of spies and graft by the United Front Work Department, intimidation conducted by the People’s Liberation Army (PLA) and the Armed Police/Coast Guard, and endless subversive political warfare measures, including cyber-attacks, economic coercion, and diplomatic isolation. The percentage of Taiwanese that prefer the status quo or prefer moving towards independence continues to rise — 76 percent as of December last year. According to National Chengchi University (NCCU) polling, the Taiwanese
It would be absurd to claim to see a silver lining behind every US President Donald Trump cloud. Those clouds are too many, too dark and too dangerous. All the same, viewed from a domestic political perspective, there is a clear emerging UK upside to Trump’s efforts at crashing the post-Cold War order. It might even get a boost from Thursday’s Washington visit by British Prime Minister Keir Starmer. In July last year, when Starmer became prime minister, the Labour Party was rigidly on the defensive about Europe. Brexit was seen as an electorally unstable issue for a party whose priority
US President Donald Trump’s return to the White House has brought renewed scrutiny to the Taiwan-US semiconductor relationship with his claim that Taiwan “stole” the US chip business and threats of 100 percent tariffs on foreign-made processors. For Taiwanese and industry leaders, understanding those developments in their full context is crucial while maintaining a clear vision of Taiwan’s role in the global technology ecosystem. The assertion that Taiwan “stole” the US’ semiconductor industry fundamentally misunderstands the evolution of global technology manufacturing. Over the past four decades, Taiwan’s semiconductor industry, led by Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co (TSMC), has grown through legitimate means
Today is Feb. 28, a day that Taiwan associates with two tragic historical memories. The 228 Incident, which started on Feb. 28, 1947, began from protests sparked by a cigarette seizure that took place the day before in front of the Tianma Tea House in Taipei’s Datong District (大同). It turned into a mass movement that spread across Taiwan. Local gentry asked then-governor general Chen Yi (陳儀) to intervene, but he received contradictory orders. In early March, after Chiang Kai-shek (蔣介石) dispatched troops to Keelung, a nationwide massacre took place and lasted until May 16, during which many important intellectuals