The Department of Health (DOH) announced yesterday it would use the liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry (LC-MS/MS) method to test for melamine in raw materials used for making creamer, milk powder and baby formula and conduct random checks on 20 percent of all finished versions of these products from high-risk countries.
The DOH deserves credit for employing this method to test for the toxic substance as experts say the LC-MS/MS method is capable of detecting melamine at levels as low as 1 part per billion (ppb) — a much more stringent level than 1 or 2.5 parts per million (ppm) that were previously considered.
Until the DOH publicized its decision yesterday, its handling of the melamine scare raised doubt as to whether it had the public’s interests at heart.
Shortly after toxic milk powder from China first sparked panic in Taiwan, contaminated non-dairy creamer was discovered, casting doubts on the safety of instant coffee powder, cookies, candy, soup powder and other products.
The government won some applause for its response when an emergency meeting headed by Premier Liu Chao-shiuan (劉兆玄) first decided last Tuesday that all vegetable-based protein products must be pulled from store shelves until they could be tested for melamine. Even President Ma Ying-jeou (馬英九) lauded the decision as a “good expression of determination.”
However, less than 12 hours later, the government flip-flopped and said that only selected China-made products needed to be pulled. Furthermore, it eased the standard of acceptable melamine content, adopting the 2.5ppm standard used in Hong Kong.
After coming under fire for its 2.5ppm statement, the DOH changed its mind again, employing the stringent LC-MS/MS method to test for melamine — but only on raw materials for creamer, milk powder and baby formula.
After so many 180-degree turns, the public is understandably confused about what products are safe, and after waiting so long for the DOH to make up its mind, the policies it has implemented still leave gaping holes of risk.
First, the LC-MS/MS testing — while very stringent — will only be used on 20 percent of finished creamer, milk powder and baby formula products from high-risk countries. What about the 80 percent not tested?
Second, there was no word about testing other types of finished products. Chinese-made products have already been banned, but products in other countries using Chinese materials have not. That means cookies, candies, soup powder and other products that have been recalled in countries around the globe would remain on store shelves — untested — in Taiwan.
It’s possible that DOH officials are comforting themselves with the notion that these other products wouldn’t pose “that much” risk because they don’t contain “that much” of the contaminated raw material. This is a slippery slope and one which Taiwanese must refuse to sit on.
The only “acceptable” risk in this case is zero.
Monday was the 37th anniversary of former president Chiang Ching-kuo’s (蔣經國) death. Chiang — a son of former president Chiang Kai-shek (蔣介石), who had implemented party-state rule and martial law in Taiwan — has a complicated legacy. Whether one looks at his time in power in a positive or negative light depends very much on who they are, and what their relationship with the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) is. Although toward the end of his life Chiang Ching-kuo lifted martial law and steered Taiwan onto the path of democratization, these changes were forced upon him by internal and external pressures,
Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) caucus whip Fu Kun-chi (傅?萁) has caused havoc with his attempts to overturn the democratic and constitutional order in the legislature. If we look at this devolution from the context of a transition to democracy from authoritarianism in a culturally Chinese sense — that of zhonghua (中華) — then we are playing witness to a servile spirit from a millennia-old form of totalitarianism that is intent on damaging the nation’s hard-won democracy. This servile spirit is ingrained in Chinese culture. About a century ago, Chinese satirist and author Lu Xun (魯迅) saw through the servile nature of
In their New York Times bestseller How Democracies Die, Harvard political scientists Steven Levitsky and Daniel Ziblatt said that democracies today “may die at the hands not of generals but of elected leaders. Many government efforts to subvert democracy are ‘legal,’ in the sense that they are approved by the legislature or accepted by the courts. They may even be portrayed as efforts to improve democracy — making the judiciary more efficient, combating corruption, or cleaning up the electoral process.” Moreover, the two authors observe that those who denounce such legal threats to democracy are often “dismissed as exaggerating or
Taiwan People’s Party (TPP) Acting Chairman Huang Kuo-chang (黃國昌) has formally announced his intention to stand for permanent party chairman. He has decided that he is the right person to steer the fledgling third force in Taiwan’s politics through the challenges it would certainly face in the post-Ko Wen-je (柯文哲) era, rather than serve in a caretaker role while the party finds a more suitable candidate. Huang is sure to secure the position. He is almost certainly not the right man for the job. Ko not only founded the party, he forged it into a one-man political force, with himself
RSS