The UN General Assembly met on Tuesday to review Taiwan’s application for “meaningful participation” in the UN agencies. This was the 15th consecutive year that Taiwan tried to gain some form of representation in the 192 member world body.
Last year, at the 62nd session of the UN General Assembly, the world body decided not to include the issue of Taiwan’s participation in the UN on its agenda. That decision was made because of enormous pressure from the Chinese delegation at the UN, especially on the African delegations. When Taiwan tried to gain membership in the WHO in May this year, its attempt was again stymied by China.
In the first instance, China’s Ambassador to the UN Wang Guangya (王光亞) told reporters then that the representatives of more than 120 UN member-states had clearly indicated at the plenary meeting of the Assembly that they were “opposed to the inclusion of the so-called Taiwan-related proposal into the agenda.”
Wang made the dubious claim that “both the mainland and Taiwan belong to one and the same China” and that this “has never been changed.” He also said: “There is only one China in the world and Taiwan is a part of China’s territory. This is the common position of the United Nations and the overwhelming majority of its member states.”
What Wang did not mention was the fact that, from 1945 to 1971, Taiwan represented the whole of China within the UN system and held a permanent seat on the UN Security Council. This was because the US and other victors in World War II simply chose to recognize the non-Communist entity (the Republic of China) over the Communist-controlled mainland China (the People’s Republic of China). This Cold War anomaly was corrected in 1971, when mainland China took Taiwan’s place on the Security Council and in the rest of the UN system.
This move made sense from the point of view that one cannot justify a situation in which a population of 1.3 billion people — mainland China — are represented by an island with only 23 million people — Taiwan.
But the UN made an egregious mistake in 1971. Taiwan at the time exhibited the main criteria for a sovereign state — control over a delimited territory, people, resources and an effective government. Yet, it disappeared from the UN system altogether.
As the world’s governing body, the UN operates on the principle of universality. This means that if a state meets the criteria for membership within this august body, then the organization should accept that state into the family of nations. The main criterion for UN membership is clear and can be found in Article 4(2) of its Charter. That article states that to be a member of the organization the applicant must be a “peace-loving” state willing and able to carry out the Charter’s obligations.
There is no doubt that Taiwan is a peace-loving state. Despite not being a member of the UN, it carries out the obligations of the UN Charter. In my visit to Taiwan earlier this year to observe the well-run presidential election, I came away with the impression that Taiwan is truly a de jure sovereign entity. In fact, it is more “sovereign” than many African countries whose economies are in tatters and whose governments are on the brink of inefficiency and outright failure. Yet, many states that are less able to control their populations, territory and resources are members of the UN — because of the universality principle.
Taiwan is a self-governing, autonomous, and prosperous entity with 35,980km² of territory that includes the Pescadores, Matsu, and Kinmen islands. It possesses ample natural resources (including coal, natural gas, limestone, marble and asbestos) and is able to meet the needs of its 23 million people. Its GNP of US$17,252 makes it the 18th largest economy in the world. It is a country with the fourth largest foreign exchange reserves globally, with a thriving IT sector and a record of humanitarian assistance to countries in need.
It is time for the UN representatives to stop giving in to pressure from China and do what is not only sensible but right in granting Taiwan a seat at the table, at least in some UN agencies. Taiwan can do much good in the areas of economic development, technical assistance, health, agriculture, the environment, the protection of endangered species and regional and global security. Why should China be allowed to object to Taiwan’s bid to make a positive contribution to the global agenda? What does China have to fear?
China is clearly emerging as a major global power. Its trade with African countries has quadrupled since the beginning of this decade. China is now Africa’s third-largest commercial partner after the US and France, and it is the second largest exporter to Africa after France.
We all know the primary reason why China needs Africa: natural resources. China needs oil in abundance and wants, like the US, to diversify its supply away from the troublesome area of the Middle East. But there is another reason.
In providing trade, aid, loans, debt relief, scholarships, arms and investments to African countries, China ensures that these countries are indebted to it. African states, through sheer numbers, dominate the UN General Assembly. Therefore, if China wants to deny Taiwan a place within the world body, all it has to do is put pressure on African delegations and remind them how good the Chinese government has been to them.
At the same time, the US has lost much of its clout in Africa. Even if it wanted to support Taiwan’s bid for membership in UN agencies, it can no longer muster enough support from countries in Africa to make this bid a reality.
So, for Taiwan’s application to be successful, it will have to hope that China feels secure enough to desist from placing obstacles in Taiwan’s path.
W. Andy Knight is professor of international relations at the University of Alberta and director of the Peace and Post Conflict Studies program and a governor of the Canadian International Development Research Centre.
Taiwan’s victory in the World Baseball Softball Confederation Premier12 championship is an historic achievement. Yet once again this achievement is marred by the indignity of the imposed moniker “Chinese Taipei.” The absurdity is compounded by the fact that none of the players are even from Taipei, and some, such as Paiwan catcher Giljegiljaw Kungkuan, are not even ethnically Chinese. The issue garnered attention around the Paris Olympics, yet fell off the agenda as Olympic memories retreated. “Chinese Taipei” persists, and the baseball championship serves as a reminder that fighting “Chinese Taipei” must be a continuous campaign, not merely resurfacing around international
Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co (TSMC) appears to be encountering some culture shock and safety issues at its new fab in Arizona. On Nov. 7, Arizona state authorities cited TSMC for worker safety violations, fining the company US$16,131, after a man died in May. The Arizona Division of Occupational Safety and Health released its six-month investigation into the fatality and cited TSMC for failing to keep the workplace free from hazards likely to cause death or serious harm. At about the same time, the chip giant was also sued for alleged discriminatory hiring practices favoring Asians, prompting a flurry of debate on whether TSMC’s
This month, the National Health Insurance (NHI) is to implement a major policy change by eliminating the suspension-and-resumption mechanism for Taiwanese residing abroad. With more than 210,000 Taiwanese living overseas — many with greater financial means than those in Taiwan — this reform, catalyzed by a 2022 Constitutional Court ruling, underscores the importance of fairness, sustainability and shared responsibility in one of the world’s most admired public healthcare systems. Beyond legal obligations, expatriates have a compelling moral duty to contribute, recognizing their stake in a system that embodies the principle of health as a human right. The ruling declared the prior
US president-elect Donald Trump is inheriting from President Joe Biden a challenging situation for American policy in the Indo-Pacific region, with an expansionist China on the march and threatening to incorporate Taiwan, by force if necessary. US policy choices have become increasingly difficult, in part because Biden’s policy of engagement with China, including investing in personal diplomacy with President Xi Jinping (習近平), has not only yielded little but also allowed the Chinese military to gain a stronger footing in the South China Sea and the Taiwan Strait. In Xi’s Nov. 16 Lima meeting with a diminished Biden, the Chinese strongman signaled little
RSS