After a lackluster presidential campaign that wasted far too much breath on non-issues like the status of President Ma Ying-jeou’s (馬英九) green card, serious damage was done to the reputation of the Democratic Progressive Party (DPP).
Add to this the eruption of money-laundering allegations against the party’s single most influential figure, former president Chen Shui-bian (陳水扁), who withdrew from the DPP last month, and things look even bleaker than after the party’s humiliation at January’s legislative polls.
Key to the party’s recovery will be the strength of new voices, which must present the face of a maturing DPP. That will require not only demonstrating a commitment to discussing reform, but showcasing concrete changes.
Unfortunately, the DPP has little to show for all its talk on overcoming its weaknesses. With nominations for the next round of local government elections already being discussed, the DPP must shift into action or it will have a tough case to make for its candidates next year.
But there is plenty of fodder for successful campaigning.
Investors and economic analysts are largely unimpressed with the Ma administration’s handling of the economy, while the public has seen no indication that Ma’s policies on China will have a positive impact on their living standards.
In addition, allegations of corruption and misuse of funds have called into question the actions of local chiefs such as Taitung County Commissioner Kuang Li-chen (鄺麗貞) and Taipei County Commissioner Chou Hsi-wei (周錫瑋) of the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT). Kuang sparked an outcry by continuing with an overseas trip as a typhoon approached her county — criticism that stirred up its own storm as questions grew about her use of taxpayers’ money. Chou, meanwhile, is busy fending off allegations that his office accepted bribes from a parking lot company.
If the DPP hopes to offer strong alternatives in the next legislative and presidential polls, it must begin in next year’s local elections by offering real alternatives to the same shady politics that has long frustrated the public.
For this reason, it was disappointing to hear on Monday that DPP Chairwoman Tsai Ing-wen (蔡英文) will likely not run against Chou for the Taipei County commissionership. The increasingly popular chairwoman has repeatedly expressed her intentions to shake up the party and has dealt well with the scandal surrounding Chen, but the public is still waiting to see her take a more aggressive role in reshaping her party. Tsai must indicate that she is more than the new face of DPP public relations.
Taipei County, meanwhile, deserves a county commissioner with its best interests in mind — one who does not blur the lines of legality and illegality, as Chou has expressed a willingness to do to see through the construction of the Tanbei Expressway.
The elections for county commissioner may seem far on the horizon, but for the DPP there is no time for licking wounds. If the party has learned anything from adversity, now is the time to start making its case. Ma’s administration has certainly offered enough bungling for it to capitalize on.
Concerns that the US might abandon Taiwan are often overstated. While US President Donald Trump’s handling of Ukraine raised unease in Taiwan, it is crucial to recognize that Taiwan is not Ukraine. Under Trump, the US views Ukraine largely as a European problem, whereas the Indo-Pacific region remains its primary geopolitical focus. Taipei holds immense strategic value for Washington and is unlikely to be treated as a bargaining chip in US-China relations. Trump’s vision of “making America great again” would be directly undermined by any move to abandon Taiwan. Despite the rhetoric of “America First,” the Trump administration understands the necessity of
US President Donald Trump’s challenge to domestic American economic-political priorities, and abroad to the global balance of power, are not a threat to the security of Taiwan. Trump’s success can go far to contain the real threat — the Chinese Communist Party’s (CCP) surge to hegemony — while offering expanded defensive opportunities for Taiwan. In a stunning affirmation of the CCP policy of “forceful reunification,” an obscene euphemism for the invasion of Taiwan and the destruction of its democracy, on March 13, 2024, the People’s Liberation Army’s (PLA) used Chinese social media platforms to show the first-time linkage of three new
If you had a vision of the future where China did not dominate the global car industry, you can kiss those dreams goodbye. That is because US President Donald Trump’s promised 25 percent tariff on auto imports takes an ax to the only bits of the emerging electric vehicle (EV) supply chain that are not already dominated by Beijing. The biggest losers when the levies take effect this week would be Japan and South Korea. They account for one-third of the cars imported into the US, and as much as two-thirds of those imported from outside North America. (Mexico and Canada, while
I have heard people equate the government’s stance on resisting forced unification with China or the conditional reinstatement of the military court system with the rise of the Nazis before World War II. The comparison is absurd. There is no meaningful parallel between the government and Nazi Germany, nor does such a mindset exist within the general public in Taiwan. It is important to remember that the German public bore some responsibility for the horrors of the Holocaust. Post-World War II Germany’s transitional justice efforts were rooted in a national reckoning and introspection. Many Jews were sent to concentration camps not
RSS