Ma’s obscured unification
In the last 100 days, many Taiwanese have become aware of the gap between President Ma Ying-jeou’s (馬英九) pre-election rhetoric and his post election performance. The role of the media in facilitating this gap was critical.
It was Taiwan’s politically affiliated media that helped propagate election slogans, argued for and against particular candidates and decided what extent of print, Web and TV coverage would be devoted to what the candidates said and the possible impact of their manifestos.
In spending five times more than the DPP on their election campaign, the KMT achieved a saturation of media that greatly boosted Ma’s chances of victory.
Such was the penetration of their election propaganda that many of the KMT talking points became decontested in voters minds; that is, they entered the realm of “common sense.”
Many light green supporters and young voters took this “common sense” without questioning it.
They thought Ma to be pragmatic, not radical, more of a consensus builder than a conflict instigator. They believed him when he expressed his determination to protect the sovereignty of Taiwan and promised that with Vincent Siew (蕭萬長) as vice president, the economy would improve dramatically.
One of the most notable slogans to aid the insemination of these misconceptions about Ma was a pun meaning “Ma becoming president is a good thing” and “Things will be better immediately.”
Later this was amended to “When Ma is elected, things will start to get better immediately.”
On the day Ma was inaugurated, however, the stock market dropped and has yet to recover. During the election, Ma and the KMT glibly promised a benchmark of more than 15,000, but today the TAIEX stands at 6,300, well below the critical 7,000 line.
It is possible that Ma and Siew may well have even believed their own lie about Chen’s poor economic management and thus overlooked the clear signs of global economic slowdown ahead, but their own act of misleading the Taiwanese public paradoxically left them unready to respond when the stock market crashed.
Their first limp response was “When Ma is elected, things will gradually get better.”
Things haven’t and tens of thousands of politically mobilized Taiwanese recently took to the streets to raise the question that if the party of the economy can’t make the economy better, can they be trusted to defend the country?
After Ma’s recent comments that Taiwan was not a country, perhaps a new slogan is appropriate for these times: “Ma won and Taiwan will soon be finished.”
The real tragedy is that many Taiwanese voted for unification without knowing it because they believed the sophisticated advertising designed to obscure the KMT’s not so hidden agenda.
Those interested in using democracy to rebalance this abuse should prepare themselves to vote DPP for all township, county and mayoral elections next year.
Only this way will the KMT get the message that Taiwan as a country and its democracy are here to stay, and they will not be allowed to trade it for their own pernicious financial gain.
Ben Goren
Meinung,
Kaohsiung County
In their recent op-ed “Trump Should Rein In Taiwan” in Foreign Policy magazine, Christopher Chivvis and Stephen Wertheim argued that the US should pressure President William Lai (賴清德) to “tone it down” to de-escalate tensions in the Taiwan Strait — as if Taiwan’s words are more of a threat to peace than Beijing’s actions. It is an old argument dressed up in new concern: that Washington must rein in Taipei to avoid war. However, this narrative gets it backward. Taiwan is not the problem; China is. Calls for a so-called “grand bargain” with Beijing — where the US pressures Taiwan into concessions
The term “assassin’s mace” originates from Chinese folklore, describing a concealed weapon used by a weaker hero to defeat a stronger adversary with an unexpected strike. In more general military parlance, the concept refers to an asymmetric capability that targets a critical vulnerability of an adversary. China has found its modern equivalent of the assassin’s mace with its high-altitude electromagnetic pulse (HEMP) weapons, which are nuclear warheads detonated at a high altitude, emitting intense electromagnetic radiation capable of disabling and destroying electronics. An assassin’s mace weapon possesses two essential characteristics: strategic surprise and the ability to neutralize a core dependency.
Chinese President and Chinese Communist Party (CCP) Chairman Xi Jinping (習近平) said in a politburo speech late last month that his party must protect the “bottom line” to prevent systemic threats. The tone of his address was grave, revealing deep anxieties about China’s current state of affairs. Essentially, what he worries most about is systemic threats to China’s normal development as a country. The US-China trade war has turned white hot: China’s export orders have plummeted, Chinese firms and enterprises are shutting up shop, and local debt risks are mounting daily, causing China’s economy to flag externally and hemorrhage internally. China’s
US President Donald Trump and Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) were born under the sign of Gemini. Geminis are known for their intelligence, creativity, adaptability and flexibility. It is unlikely, then, that the trade conflict between the US and China would escalate into a catastrophic collision. It is more probable that both sides would seek a way to de-escalate, paving the way for a Trump-Xi summit that allows the global economy some breathing room. Practically speaking, China and the US have vulnerabilities, and a prolonged trade war would be damaging for both. In the US, the electoral system means that public opinion
RSS