Some people have trouble saying the words “thank you,” while others are too arrogant to utter the word “please.” As for President Ma Ying-jeou (馬英九), “sorry” seems to be the hardest word for him to say with sincerity to the Taiwanese public as he fails to deliver on his campaign pledge of “salvaging the nation’s economy.”
Many vividly remember the loud and catchy campaigns Ma and his team ran before the March 22 presidential election. Newspaper advertisements, roadside billboards and round-the-clock TV campaign spots trumpeted the slogan “Ma will turn things around (馬上好)” and “We are ready!” with campaign brochures promising voters that he would revive the nation’s economy with his running mate Vincent Siew (蕭萬長), whom he lauded as “the architect of Taiwan’s economy.”
Following his inauguration on May 20 and with a line up of Cabinet members that called themselves the “pro-finance and economy Cabinet,” the Ma administration’s rhetoric gave the public high hopes for the nation’s economic outlook.
Now, 110 days into office, what have Ma and his team delivered so far? Not much, as the Taiwan Stock Exchange’s performance indicates. The benchmark index fell further below the 20-year average to 6,424.77 on Tuesday.
In a recent interview with the Mexican daily El Sol de Mexico, Ma admitted that elements of his “6-3-3” economic pledge — promising an annual GDP growth rate of 6 percent, annual unemployment of 3 percent and an annual per capita income of US$30,000 — won’t be realized until 2016, the final year of a second presidential term.
The remarks bemused many who pinned high expectations on Ma, and also demonstrated Ma’s arrogance — what made him so sure that he will be elected for a second term when he can’t deliver on his first term pledges?
The most curious thing of all is that Ma refuses to admit his campaign promises have been broken, let alone apologize for them. After causing quite a stir with his remarks made in the interview with the Mexican press, Ma did indeed apologize — not for failing to meet his campaign pledge — but instead for “not clearly explaining the policy.”
It is possible that Ma, filled with his Greater China mentality, is obsessed with saving face and fears disgrace if he admits his hand-picked Cabinet needs a reshuffle.
It is true that the world has been experiencing an economic downturn and it is unfortunate that the nature of politics has created a scenario where politicians feel the need to make extravagant promises to get elected. But these facts do not excuse Ma from the need to take responsibility for the words that came from his mouth.
The agreement he made with the public in order to get elected was economic revival.
It has not happened and attempts to reframe the agreement as an eight-year deal instead of a one-year deal leave the public feeling cheated.
Every child is taught that once you realize you have broken an agreement, you must sincerely offer an apology, assume responsibility and make amends.
The question is whether the electorate is prepared to hold Ma to even this standard.
Why is Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) not a “happy camper” these days regarding Taiwan? Taiwanese have not become more “CCP friendly” in response to the Chinese Communist Party’s (CCP) use of spies and graft by the United Front Work Department, intimidation conducted by the People’s Liberation Army (PLA) and the Armed Police/Coast Guard, and endless subversive political warfare measures, including cyber-attacks, economic coercion, and diplomatic isolation. The percentage of Taiwanese that prefer the status quo or prefer moving towards independence continues to rise — 76 percent as of December last year. According to National Chengchi University (NCCU) polling, the Taiwanese
US political scientist Francis Fukuyama, during an interview with the UK’s Times Radio, reacted to US President Donald Trump’s overturning of decades of US foreign policy by saying that “the chance for serious instability is very great.” That is something of an understatement. Fukuyama said that Trump’s apparent moves to expand US territory and that he “seems to be actively siding with” authoritarian states is concerning, not just for Europe, but also for Taiwan. He said that “if I were China I would see this as a golden opportunity” to annex Taiwan, and that every European country needs to think
Today is Feb. 28, a day that Taiwan associates with two tragic historical memories. The 228 Incident, which started on Feb. 28, 1947, began from protests sparked by a cigarette seizure that took place the day before in front of the Tianma Tea House in Taipei’s Datong District (大同). It turned into a mass movement that spread across Taiwan. Local gentry asked then-governor general Chen Yi (陳儀) to intervene, but he received contradictory orders. In early March, after Chiang Kai-shek (蔣介石) dispatched troops to Keelung, a nationwide massacre took place and lasted until May 16, during which many important intellectuals
US President Donald Trump’s return to the White House has brought renewed scrutiny to the Taiwan-US semiconductor relationship with his claim that Taiwan “stole” the US chip business and threats of 100 percent tariffs on foreign-made processors. For Taiwanese and industry leaders, understanding those developments in their full context is crucial while maintaining a clear vision of Taiwan’s role in the global technology ecosystem. The assertion that Taiwan “stole” the US’ semiconductor industry fundamentally misunderstands the evolution of global technology manufacturing. Over the past four decades, Taiwan’s semiconductor industry, led by Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co (TSMC), has grown through legitimate means
RSS