Some people have trouble saying the words “thank you,” while others are too arrogant to utter the word “please.” As for President Ma Ying-jeou (馬英九), “sorry” seems to be the hardest word for him to say with sincerity to the Taiwanese public as he fails to deliver on his campaign pledge of “salvaging the nation’s economy.”
Many vividly remember the loud and catchy campaigns Ma and his team ran before the March 22 presidential election. Newspaper advertisements, roadside billboards and round-the-clock TV campaign spots trumpeted the slogan “Ma will turn things around (馬上好)” and “We are ready!” with campaign brochures promising voters that he would revive the nation’s economy with his running mate Vincent Siew (蕭萬長), whom he lauded as “the architect of Taiwan’s economy.”
Following his inauguration on May 20 and with a line up of Cabinet members that called themselves the “pro-finance and economy Cabinet,” the Ma administration’s rhetoric gave the public high hopes for the nation’s economic outlook.
Now, 110 days into office, what have Ma and his team delivered so far? Not much, as the Taiwan Stock Exchange’s performance indicates. The benchmark index fell further below the 20-year average to 6,424.77 on Tuesday.
In a recent interview with the Mexican daily El Sol de Mexico, Ma admitted that elements of his “6-3-3” economic pledge — promising an annual GDP growth rate of 6 percent, annual unemployment of 3 percent and an annual per capita income of US$30,000 — won’t be realized until 2016, the final year of a second presidential term.
The remarks bemused many who pinned high expectations on Ma, and also demonstrated Ma’s arrogance — what made him so sure that he will be elected for a second term when he can’t deliver on his first term pledges?
The most curious thing of all is that Ma refuses to admit his campaign promises have been broken, let alone apologize for them. After causing quite a stir with his remarks made in the interview with the Mexican press, Ma did indeed apologize — not for failing to meet his campaign pledge — but instead for “not clearly explaining the policy.”
It is possible that Ma, filled with his Greater China mentality, is obsessed with saving face and fears disgrace if he admits his hand-picked Cabinet needs a reshuffle.
It is true that the world has been experiencing an economic downturn and it is unfortunate that the nature of politics has created a scenario where politicians feel the need to make extravagant promises to get elected. But these facts do not excuse Ma from the need to take responsibility for the words that came from his mouth.
The agreement he made with the public in order to get elected was economic revival.
It has not happened and attempts to reframe the agreement as an eight-year deal instead of a one-year deal leave the public feeling cheated.
Every child is taught that once you realize you have broken an agreement, you must sincerely offer an apology, assume responsibility and make amends.
The question is whether the electorate is prepared to hold Ma to even this standard.
Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) caucus whip Fu Kun-chi (傅?萁) has caused havoc with his attempts to overturn the democratic and constitutional order in the legislature. If we look at this devolution from the context of a transition to democracy from authoritarianism in a culturally Chinese sense — that of zhonghua (中華) — then we are playing witness to a servile spirit from a millennia-old form of totalitarianism that is intent on damaging the nation’s hard-won democracy. This servile spirit is ingrained in Chinese culture. About a century ago, Chinese satirist and author Lu Xun (魯迅) saw through the servile nature of
In their New York Times bestseller How Democracies Die, Harvard political scientists Steven Levitsky and Daniel Ziblatt said that democracies today “may die at the hands not of generals but of elected leaders. Many government efforts to subvert democracy are ‘legal,’ in the sense that they are approved by the legislature or accepted by the courts. They may even be portrayed as efforts to improve democracy — making the judiciary more efficient, combating corruption, or cleaning up the electoral process.” Moreover, the two authors observe that those who denounce such legal threats to democracy are often “dismissed as exaggerating or
Monday was the 37th anniversary of former president Chiang Ching-kuo’s (蔣經國) death. Chiang — a son of former president Chiang Kai-shek (蔣介石), who had implemented party-state rule and martial law in Taiwan — has a complicated legacy. Whether one looks at his time in power in a positive or negative light depends very much on who they are, and what their relationship with the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) is. Although toward the end of his life Chiang Ching-kuo lifted martial law and steered Taiwan onto the path of democratization, these changes were forced upon him by internal and external pressures,
The Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) caucus in the Legislative Yuan has made an internal decision to freeze NT$1.8 billion (US$54.7 million) of the indigenous submarine project’s NT$2 billion budget. This means that up to 90 percent of the budget cannot be utilized. It would only be accessible if the legislature agrees to lift the freeze sometime in the future. However, for Taiwan to construct its own submarines, it must rely on foreign support for several key pieces of equipment and technology. These foreign supporters would also be forced to endure significant pressure, infiltration and influence from Beijing. In other words,
RSS