Plans to build a 4.7km expressway from Tamsui to Taipei made headlines again last week as the Taipei County Government held a public meeting to pacify residents and environmentalists vehemently opposed to the project.
If realized, the Tanbei Expressway would run along the Tamsui River — at its closest only 2m from protected mangrove swamps — and the highly popular bike path that many Taipei residents enjoy as a nearby green getaway from the sights and sounds of the city.
County officials have repeatedly tried to allay public concerns over the planned road — in all the wrong ways. Rather than addressing the potential impact of this project on the environment and the high costs involved, the county government has served up euphemisms and transparent rationalizations.
The government has classified the Tanbei Expressway as a “flat road,” even though 2.2km of it would be elevated, to avoid the “expressway” label. It claims the expressway would be temporary and an alternative route to the congested Provincial Highway 2, providing a speedier thoroughfare for emergency traffic such as ambulances, as well as commuters.
In reality, media reports indicate that the county government offered that rationale only after residents began urging authorities to deal with heavy traffic on Provincial Highway 2. The idea that the NT$3.8 billion (US$119.2 million) expressway would be a temporary measure to deal with that traffic is laughable.
The plot thickened in July, when, after concerns were raised that the expressway would plough through an archeological site, the county government sent out letters announcing that construction on the project would begin this year.
The Liberty Times (the Taipei Times’ sister newspaper) quoted Taipei County Commissioner Chou Hsi-wei (周錫瑋) as saying the project would begin “even if it is illegal.”
It may come as a shock that a plan threatening a unique ecological system and archeological site, and likely to exacerbate flooding and erosion in the area, could soon begin without real scrutiny.
The contentious Suhua Freeway has undergone a decade of environmental impact assessments (EIA) because of concerns that damage to the environment would outweigh the benefits of the road.
The Tanbei Expressway, however, neatly skirts this problem by staying under the 5km threshold, above which planned roads must apply for EIAs. The prospect that this project could threaten the Tamsui River’s mangroves as the Environmental Protection Administration stands idly by is yet another example of that agency’s impotence.
Likewise, it is to the discredit of the county government that concerns about erosion have not slowed the planning process. Following heavy rains and widespread flooding this year, a public outcry drew attention to the tragic ramifications of unwise construction projects and inadequate flood-prevention measures along waterways. In response, President Ma Ying-jeou (馬英九) toured dredging projects and early last month asked Chou to draw up a comprehensive plan to address flooding in his county.
Both county and central government authorities must look into the raft of complaints about this project. However, expressway opponents must not be deterred by Chou’s blatant disregard of their concerns or the law. They should continue to raise questions, even if no one in authority wants to provide an answer.
Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) caucus whip Fu Kun-chi (傅?萁) has caused havoc with his attempts to overturn the democratic and constitutional order in the legislature. If we look at this devolution from the context of a transition to democracy from authoritarianism in a culturally Chinese sense — that of zhonghua (中華) — then we are playing witness to a servile spirit from a millennia-old form of totalitarianism that is intent on damaging the nation’s hard-won democracy. This servile spirit is ingrained in Chinese culture. About a century ago, Chinese satirist and author Lu Xun (魯迅) saw through the servile nature of
In their New York Times bestseller How Democracies Die, Harvard political scientists Steven Levitsky and Daniel Ziblatt said that democracies today “may die at the hands not of generals but of elected leaders. Many government efforts to subvert democracy are ‘legal,’ in the sense that they are approved by the legislature or accepted by the courts. They may even be portrayed as efforts to improve democracy — making the judiciary more efficient, combating corruption, or cleaning up the electoral process.” Moreover, the two authors observe that those who denounce such legal threats to democracy are often “dismissed as exaggerating or
Monday was the 37th anniversary of former president Chiang Ching-kuo’s (蔣經國) death. Chiang — a son of former president Chiang Kai-shek (蔣介石), who had implemented party-state rule and martial law in Taiwan — has a complicated legacy. Whether one looks at his time in power in a positive or negative light depends very much on who they are, and what their relationship with the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) is. Although toward the end of his life Chiang Ching-kuo lifted martial law and steered Taiwan onto the path of democratization, these changes were forced upon him by internal and external pressures,
The Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) caucus in the Legislative Yuan has made an internal decision to freeze NT$1.8 billion (US$54.7 million) of the indigenous submarine project’s NT$2 billion budget. This means that up to 90 percent of the budget cannot be utilized. It would only be accessible if the legislature agrees to lift the freeze sometime in the future. However, for Taiwan to construct its own submarines, it must rely on foreign support for several key pieces of equipment and technology. These foreign supporters would also be forced to endure significant pressure, infiltration and influence from Beijing. In other words,
RSS