Plans to build a 4.7km expressway from Tamsui to Taipei made headlines again last week as the Taipei County Government held a public meeting to pacify residents and environmentalists vehemently opposed to the project.
If realized, the Tanbei Expressway would run along the Tamsui River — at its closest only 2m from protected mangrove swamps — and the highly popular bike path that many Taipei residents enjoy as a nearby green getaway from the sights and sounds of the city.
County officials have repeatedly tried to allay public concerns over the planned road — in all the wrong ways. Rather than addressing the potential impact of this project on the environment and the high costs involved, the county government has served up euphemisms and transparent rationalizations.
The government has classified the Tanbei Expressway as a “flat road,” even though 2.2km of it would be elevated, to avoid the “expressway” label. It claims the expressway would be temporary and an alternative route to the congested Provincial Highway 2, providing a speedier thoroughfare for emergency traffic such as ambulances, as well as commuters.
In reality, media reports indicate that the county government offered that rationale only after residents began urging authorities to deal with heavy traffic on Provincial Highway 2. The idea that the NT$3.8 billion (US$119.2 million) expressway would be a temporary measure to deal with that traffic is laughable.
The plot thickened in July, when, after concerns were raised that the expressway would plough through an archeological site, the county government sent out letters announcing that construction on the project would begin this year.
The Liberty Times (the Taipei Times’ sister newspaper) quoted Taipei County Commissioner Chou Hsi-wei (周錫瑋) as saying the project would begin “even if it is illegal.”
It may come as a shock that a plan threatening a unique ecological system and archeological site, and likely to exacerbate flooding and erosion in the area, could soon begin without real scrutiny.
The contentious Suhua Freeway has undergone a decade of environmental impact assessments (EIA) because of concerns that damage to the environment would outweigh the benefits of the road.
The Tanbei Expressway, however, neatly skirts this problem by staying under the 5km threshold, above which planned roads must apply for EIAs. The prospect that this project could threaten the Tamsui River’s mangroves as the Environmental Protection Administration stands idly by is yet another example of that agency’s impotence.
Likewise, it is to the discredit of the county government that concerns about erosion have not slowed the planning process. Following heavy rains and widespread flooding this year, a public outcry drew attention to the tragic ramifications of unwise construction projects and inadequate flood-prevention measures along waterways. In response, President Ma Ying-jeou (馬英九) toured dredging projects and early last month asked Chou to draw up a comprehensive plan to address flooding in his county.
Both county and central government authorities must look into the raft of complaints about this project. However, expressway opponents must not be deterred by Chou’s blatant disregard of their concerns or the law. They should continue to raise questions, even if no one in authority wants to provide an answer.
In their recent op-ed “Trump Should Rein In Taiwan” in Foreign Policy magazine, Christopher Chivvis and Stephen Wertheim argued that the US should pressure President William Lai (賴清德) to “tone it down” to de-escalate tensions in the Taiwan Strait — as if Taiwan’s words are more of a threat to peace than Beijing’s actions. It is an old argument dressed up in new concern: that Washington must rein in Taipei to avoid war. However, this narrative gets it backward. Taiwan is not the problem; China is. Calls for a so-called “grand bargain” with Beijing — where the US pressures Taiwan into concessions
The term “assassin’s mace” originates from Chinese folklore, describing a concealed weapon used by a weaker hero to defeat a stronger adversary with an unexpected strike. In more general military parlance, the concept refers to an asymmetric capability that targets a critical vulnerability of an adversary. China has found its modern equivalent of the assassin’s mace with its high-altitude electromagnetic pulse (HEMP) weapons, which are nuclear warheads detonated at a high altitude, emitting intense electromagnetic radiation capable of disabling and destroying electronics. An assassin’s mace weapon possesses two essential characteristics: strategic surprise and the ability to neutralize a core dependency.
Chinese President and Chinese Communist Party (CCP) Chairman Xi Jinping (習近平) said in a politburo speech late last month that his party must protect the “bottom line” to prevent systemic threats. The tone of his address was grave, revealing deep anxieties about China’s current state of affairs. Essentially, what he worries most about is systemic threats to China’s normal development as a country. The US-China trade war has turned white hot: China’s export orders have plummeted, Chinese firms and enterprises are shutting up shop, and local debt risks are mounting daily, causing China’s economy to flag externally and hemorrhage internally. China’s
US President Donald Trump and Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) were born under the sign of Gemini. Geminis are known for their intelligence, creativity, adaptability and flexibility. It is unlikely, then, that the trade conflict between the US and China would escalate into a catastrophic collision. It is more probable that both sides would seek a way to de-escalate, paving the way for a Trump-Xi summit that allows the global economy some breathing room. Practically speaking, China and the US have vulnerabilities, and a prolonged trade war would be damaging for both. In the US, the electoral system means that public opinion
RSS