To the public, President Ma Ying-jeou’s (馬英九) “diplomatic truce” is all about showing China too much goodwill and offering too many compromises. The government is voluntarily restricting its freedom of movement without getting anything in return. This looks more like capitulation than a truce.
The advantage of Taiwan and China not pursuing each other’s diplomatic allies is that a lot of resources are saved, but it doesn’t mean that both sides gain equal benefits, since they are far from equal in terms of leverage. The loss of a few small diplomatic allies would not cost China much sleep, but for Taiwan, its tiny band of allies underpins its claims to statehood under international law. If Taiwan stops trying to develop diplomatic relationships, China will have a lot of room, while Taiwan will be moving one step closer to the edge.
Diplomacy is supposed to protect and promote Taiwan’s existence and dignity. Taiwan cannot afford to expose its national interests to so much risk or to try to measure the value of its sovereignty. Some things shouldn’t be sold because they are as valuable as life itself. There should never be the slightest hint at the possibility that Taiwan has tried to sell or exchange its sovereignty or even worse, give it away for free.
Sovereignty must not be a bargaining chip because that would put Taiwan on the road to extinction. Without the moral courage to insist on this point, even our self-respect will vanish. A country willing to use its sovereignty as a bargaining chip will not win the respect of its opponent, nor will it gain international support.
Taiwan’s effort to join the UN has also weakened noticeably, and it now seems to be a perfunctory matter. It was extremely disappointing to see both the Presidential Office and the Cabinet defend the oppressive comments by Chinese Ambassador to the UN Wang Guangya (王光亞) regarding Taiwan’s UN hopes, rather than showing some moral fiber and sticking to their position. China continues to use its carrot and stick approach, but all Taiwan has is a weak defense. Seeing this cowardly reaction, why should Beijing be bothered with anything Taiwan has to say? If Taiwan’s leaders are unwilling to speak up for the nation, its diplomatic allies are certain to stop speaking up on Taiwan’s behalf, too.
If both Taiwan and China want a cross-strait diplomatic truce, it is only right that the stronger party make some goodwill gestures first. Why should the weaker party make all the compromises? Since Taiwan is the underdog, it must act with utmost caution. The seesaw diplomatic battle over recognition may have come to a temporary halt, but Taiwan cannot give up its diplomatic efforts before having achieved some concrete results — that would be both dangerous and stupid.
The Ma administration is afraid of offending China and even more afraid of criticizing Beijing because any of its political achievements seem to be utterly dependent on Chinese cooperation. What’s worse, top decision makers seem to lack both idealism and theoretical grounding. Because they also are completely disconnected from reality, they appear weak and cowardly on one hand, and to be acting unilaterally on the other. Surrendering national sovereignty without getting anything in return and calling it “a show of goodwill” will only lead to the destruction of the nation.
President William Lai (賴清德) attended a dinner held by the American Israel Public Affairs Committee (AIPAC) when representatives from the group visited Taiwan in October. In a speech at the event, Lai highlighted similarities in the geopolitical challenges faced by Israel and Taiwan, saying that the two countries “stand on the front line against authoritarianism.” Lai noted how Taiwan had “immediately condemned” the Oct. 7, 2023, attack on Israel by Hamas and had provided humanitarian aid. Lai was heavily criticized from some quarters for standing with AIPAC and Israel. On Nov. 4, the Taipei Times published an opinion article (“Speak out on the
Eighty-seven percent of Taiwan’s energy supply this year came from burning fossil fuels, with more than 47 percent of that from gas-fired power generation. The figures attracted international attention since they were in October published in a Reuters report, which highlighted the fragility and structural challenges of Taiwan’s energy sector, accumulated through long-standing policy choices. The nation’s overreliance on natural gas is proving unstable and inadequate. The rising use of natural gas does not project an image of a Taiwan committed to a green energy transition; rather, it seems that Taiwan is attempting to patch up structural gaps in lieu of
News about expanding security cooperation between Israel and Taiwan, including the visits of Deputy Minister of National Defense Po Horng-huei (柏鴻輝) in September and Deputy Minister of Foreign Affairs Francois Wu (吳志中) this month, as well as growing ties in areas such as missile defense and cybersecurity, should not be viewed as isolated events. The emphasis on missile defense, including Taiwan’s newly introduced T-Dome project, is simply the most visible sign of a deeper trend that has been taking shape quietly over the past two to three years. Taipei is seeking to expand security and defense cooperation with Israel, something officials
“Can you tell me where the time and motivation will come from to get students to improve their English proficiency in four years of university?” The teacher’s question — not accusatory, just slightly exasperated — was directed at the panelists at the end of a recent conference on English language learning at Taiwanese universities. Perhaps thankfully for the professors on stage, her question was too big for the five minutes remaining. However, it hung over the venue like an ominous cloud on an otherwise sunny-skies day of research into English as a medium of instruction and the government’s Bilingual Nation 2030
RSS