In international athletic competitions, the connection between winning medals and national pride has become deeply ingrained in the minds of athletes and sports fans. This is true in both the East and the West.
However, more developed democracies do not place such an emphasis on the connection between sports and national dignity and honor. Instead, they emphasize the universal values of sport such as fair competition, entertainment, health, fitness and encouragement of the human spirit.
Judging things in this light, we can see that Taiwanese sports lovers have managed to overcome the mindset that sport acts merely in the service of the glory and honor of a nation.
During the Olympic Games, Taiwanese baseball player Chang Tai-shan (張泰山) was banned from competing after testing positive in a drug test. This was a huge blow to the strength of Taiwan’s Olympic team. Chang later apologized in the media, saying the chemicals found in his system were leftover medicine taken to help conceive a child.
Before and after Chang made his apology, Taiwanese media did not say he had disgraced the nation and comforted him instead. In stark contrast, when China’s star track athlete Liu Xiang (劉翔) pulled out of a hurdles heat because of a leg injury, many people criticized him on the Internet, giving him nicknames like “Liu the quitter.”
The gold medal Liu could have won would have been very significant for China. Huge expectations were placed on his shoulders, most probably because athletes from Asian nations have never excelled in track and field events. For the Chinese, that gold medal would have meant a great deal in breaking Western hegemony and in erasing the shame the Chinese feel they have been subjected to as a nation.
The hate for Japan that Taiwanese were taught during the early days of the Chinese Nationalist Party’s (KMT) authoritarian rule gradually waned as the nation’s democracy matured. Nationalistic ideas have weakened and many Taiwanese youth practically worship Japan and Japanese culture.
I have asked many of my students whether they would support Japan or South Korea in a baseball match. The answer from every single one was “Japan.” Even a senior sports commentator who was born in China and moved to Taiwan at a young age said on air: “I can handle Taiwan losing in baseball to Japan, but definitely not to South Korea.”
Now let us look at China. Chinese supporters wanted South Korea to defeat Japan in Olympic competitions because of a “Japanese hate complex” they developed over the experiences of World War II. In each event involving Japanese athletes, Chinese supporters cheered for Japan’s opponents and booed the Japanese team. Such behavior only serves to further ingrain feelings of national pride and past hostility between nations.
However, the Beijing Games also saw some Chinese leaving messages on the Internet that Liu should not be blamed for sports serving political ends. Volunteers at the Olympics said they were shocked and deeply moved by the Japanese team’s spirit when they witnessed Japan’s female soccer team bow to the crowd after losing, even after being booed.
Opinions that go against the grain in China are a rarity, even on the Internet, and if this type of independent thinking can develop further, it would prove to be the most precious return China would receive on the huge amount of money it invested in hosting the Games.
Chiang Wen-yu is an associate professor at the Graduate Institute of Linguistics at National Taiwan University.
TRANSLATED BY DREW CAMERON
Trying to force a partnership between Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co (TSMC) and Intel Corp would be a wildly complex ordeal. Already, the reported request from the Trump administration for TSMC to take a controlling stake in Intel’s US factories is facing valid questions about feasibility from all sides. Washington would likely not support a foreign company operating Intel’s domestic factories, Reuters reported — just look at how that is going over in the steel sector. Meanwhile, many in Taiwan are concerned about the company being forced to transfer its bleeding-edge tech capabilities and give up its strategic advantage. This is especially
US President Donald Trump’s second administration has gotten off to a fast start with a blizzard of initiatives focused on domestic commitments made during his campaign. His tariff-based approach to re-ordering global trade in a manner more favorable to the United States appears to be in its infancy, but the significant scale and scope are undeniable. That said, while China looms largest on the list of national security challenges, to date we have heard little from the administration, bar the 10 percent tariffs directed at China, on specific priorities vis-a-vis China. The Congressional hearings for President Trump’s cabinet have, so far,
US political scientist Francis Fukuyama, during an interview with the UK’s Times Radio, reacted to US President Donald Trump’s overturning of decades of US foreign policy by saying that “the chance for serious instability is very great.” That is something of an understatement. Fukuyama said that Trump’s apparent moves to expand US territory and that he “seems to be actively siding with” authoritarian states is concerning, not just for Europe, but also for Taiwan. He said that “if I were China I would see this as a golden opportunity” to annex Taiwan, and that every European country needs to think
For years, the use of insecure smart home appliances and other Internet-connected devices has resulted in personal data leaks. Many smart devices require users’ location, contact details or access to cameras and microphones to set up, which expose people’s personal information, but are unnecessary to use the product. As a result, data breaches and security incidents continue to emerge worldwide through smartphone apps, smart speakers, TVs, air fryers and robot vacuums. Last week, another major data breach was added to the list: Mars Hydro, a Chinese company that makes Internet of Things (IoT) devices such as LED grow lights and the
RSS