Five months after it was closed in response to protests that rocked Tibet, the Drepung Monastery in Lhasa quietly reopened to the public last week. As the capital’s major monastery welcomes worshippers again, it will no doubt offer some comfort and hope to Tibetans who have suffered oppression since the March demonstrations.
However, in the same week Radio Free Asia reported that more than 600 Buddhist monks from Lhasa, detained in March, remained locked up in prisons in Qinghai — among them more than 400 “troublemakers” from Drepung. The Drepung Monastery that reopened this week was no doubt a somber shadow of its original spirit, a reminder that all is not well.
Even with hundreds of dissidents tucked out of the way — including pivotal voices from the monasteries where the spring protests began — China’s apprehension about Tibetan frustration has not eased.
That was abundantly clear in China’s reaction to repeated actions by unshrinking Tibetan activists during the Beijing Games. And it was apparent on Aug. 13, when Beijing police detained journalist John Ray of the Independent television news station as he covered a peaceful protest by Students for a Free Tibet — one of around 10 foreign media workers manhandled by Chinese police during the Games.
Meanwhile, rights groups have criticized Beijing for keeping a tighter grip on Internet censorship in Tibet than in other parts of China, even as the government lifted bans on selected Web sites for reporters at the Olympics.
With the Beijing Olympics behind us, pro-Tibet activists in China and abroad may be mourning the loss of a once-in-a-lifetime event that brought unprecedented international attention to a wide variety of problems in China. There is reason to believe that winning the attention of the international community over China’s abuses will once again prove difficult in the months and years ahead.
At the same time, there is cause to hope that the roots of disgruntlement in China will continue to strengthen and eventually force change. Never have the downtrodden of China been so aware of the rights they are denied and of the existence of fellow activists around the country demanding change. The network of distraught but courageous Chinese that began “terrorizing” Beijing a few years ago with national petitions and international hunger strikes has found fertile ground in which to grow.
Reflecting on the legacy of the Games for China, International Olympic Committee president Jacques Rogge said on the last day of the Olympics that there could be no doubt that awarding the Games to Beijing had been a good choice.
Rogge may have been right. There is no question that the Games were historic. What they will be remembered for, however, is neither the change once touted by Rogge nor the unbounded glory pursued by Beijing. What will be remembered is the desperation of Chinese authorities to feign perfection at all cost and crush even the most peaceful forms of dissent.
For Tibetans, as for other oppressed groups in China, hope lies in fortifying China’s incipient culture of discontent and critical thought. Relying on the international community to pressure Beijing has its limits — and increasingly so as China’s economic clout forces world powers into silence.
Only by building a sufficiently broad and strong community of activists who understand their rights can Chinese, Uighurs and Tibetans hope to bring the authorities to their knees. The voice of anger must become so rife that it cannot be quelled, no matter how many hundreds of monks and thousands of petitioners are locked up away from the public eye.
Concerns that the US might abandon Taiwan are often overstated. While US President Donald Trump’s handling of Ukraine raised unease in Taiwan, it is crucial to recognize that Taiwan is not Ukraine. Under Trump, the US views Ukraine largely as a European problem, whereas the Indo-Pacific region remains its primary geopolitical focus. Taipei holds immense strategic value for Washington and is unlikely to be treated as a bargaining chip in US-China relations. Trump’s vision of “making America great again” would be directly undermined by any move to abandon Taiwan. Despite the rhetoric of “America First,” the Trump administration understands the necessity of
In an article published on this page on Tuesday, Kaohsiung-based journalist Julien Oeuillet wrote that “legions of people worldwide would care if a disaster occurred in South Korea or Japan, but the same people would not bat an eyelid if Taiwan disappeared.” That is quite a statement. We are constantly reading about the importance of Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co (TSMC), hailed in Taiwan as the nation’s “silicon shield” protecting it from hostile foreign forces such as the Chinese Communist Party (CCP), and so crucial to the global supply chain for semiconductors that its loss would cost the global economy US$1
US President Donald Trump’s challenge to domestic American economic-political priorities, and abroad to the global balance of power, are not a threat to the security of Taiwan. Trump’s success can go far to contain the real threat — the Chinese Communist Party’s (CCP) surge to hegemony — while offering expanded defensive opportunities for Taiwan. In a stunning affirmation of the CCP policy of “forceful reunification,” an obscene euphemism for the invasion of Taiwan and the destruction of its democracy, on March 13, 2024, the People’s Liberation Army’s (PLA) used Chinese social media platforms to show the first-time linkage of three new
Sasha B. Chhabra’s column (“Michelle Yeoh should no longer be welcome,” March 26, page 8) lamented an Instagram post by renowned actress Michelle Yeoh (楊紫瓊) about her recent visit to “Taipei, China.” It is Chhabra’s opinion that, in response to parroting Beijing’s propaganda about the status of Taiwan, Yeoh should be banned from entering this nation and her films cut off from funding by government-backed agencies, as well as disqualified from competing in the Golden Horse Awards. She and other celebrities, he wrote, must be made to understand “that there are consequences for their actions if they become political pawns of
RSS