Five months after it was closed in response to protests that rocked Tibet, the Drepung Monastery in Lhasa quietly reopened to the public last week. As the capital’s major monastery welcomes worshippers again, it will no doubt offer some comfort and hope to Tibetans who have suffered oppression since the March demonstrations.
However, in the same week Radio Free Asia reported that more than 600 Buddhist monks from Lhasa, detained in March, remained locked up in prisons in Qinghai — among them more than 400 “troublemakers” from Drepung. The Drepung Monastery that reopened this week was no doubt a somber shadow of its original spirit, a reminder that all is not well.
Even with hundreds of dissidents tucked out of the way — including pivotal voices from the monasteries where the spring protests began — China’s apprehension about Tibetan frustration has not eased.
That was abundantly clear in China’s reaction to repeated actions by unshrinking Tibetan activists during the Beijing Games. And it was apparent on Aug. 13, when Beijing police detained journalist John Ray of the Independent television news station as he covered a peaceful protest by Students for a Free Tibet — one of around 10 foreign media workers manhandled by Chinese police during the Games.
Meanwhile, rights groups have criticized Beijing for keeping a tighter grip on Internet censorship in Tibet than in other parts of China, even as the government lifted bans on selected Web sites for reporters at the Olympics.
With the Beijing Olympics behind us, pro-Tibet activists in China and abroad may be mourning the loss of a once-in-a-lifetime event that brought unprecedented international attention to a wide variety of problems in China. There is reason to believe that winning the attention of the international community over China’s abuses will once again prove difficult in the months and years ahead.
At the same time, there is cause to hope that the roots of disgruntlement in China will continue to strengthen and eventually force change. Never have the downtrodden of China been so aware of the rights they are denied and of the existence of fellow activists around the country demanding change. The network of distraught but courageous Chinese that began “terrorizing” Beijing a few years ago with national petitions and international hunger strikes has found fertile ground in which to grow.
Reflecting on the legacy of the Games for China, International Olympic Committee president Jacques Rogge said on the last day of the Olympics that there could be no doubt that awarding the Games to Beijing had been a good choice.
Rogge may have been right. There is no question that the Games were historic. What they will be remembered for, however, is neither the change once touted by Rogge nor the unbounded glory pursued by Beijing. What will be remembered is the desperation of Chinese authorities to feign perfection at all cost and crush even the most peaceful forms of dissent.
For Tibetans, as for other oppressed groups in China, hope lies in fortifying China’s incipient culture of discontent and critical thought. Relying on the international community to pressure Beijing has its limits — and increasingly so as China’s economic clout forces world powers into silence.
Only by building a sufficiently broad and strong community of activists who understand their rights can Chinese, Uighurs and Tibetans hope to bring the authorities to their knees. The voice of anger must become so rife that it cannot be quelled, no matter how many hundreds of monks and thousands of petitioners are locked up away from the public eye.
Taiwan’s semiconductor industry gives it a strategic advantage, but that advantage would be threatened as the US seeks to end Taiwan’s monopoly in the industry and as China grows more assertive, analysts said at a security dialogue last week. While the semiconductor industry is Taiwan’s “silicon shield,” its dominance has been seen by some in the US as “a monopoly,” South Korea’s Sungkyunkwan University academic Kwon Seok-joon said at an event held by the Center for Strategic and International Studies. In addition, Taiwan lacks sufficient energy sources and is vulnerable to natural disasters and geopolitical threats from China, he said.
After reading the article by Hideki Nagayama [English version on same page] published in the Liberty Times (sister newspaper of the Taipei Times) on Wednesday, I decided to write this article in hopes of ever so slightly easing my depression. In August, I visited the National Museum of Ethnology in Osaka, Japan, to attend a seminar. While there, I had the chance to look at the museum’s collections. I felt extreme annoyance at seeing that the museum had classified Taiwanese indigenous peoples as part of China’s ethnic minorities. I kept thinking about how I could make this known, but after returning
What value does the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) hold in Taiwan? One might say that it is to defend — or at the very least, maintain — truly “blue” qualities. To be truly “blue” — without impurities, rejecting any “red” influence — is to uphold the ideology consistent with that on which the Republic of China (ROC) was established. The KMT would likely not object to this notion. However, if the current generation of KMT political elites do not understand what it means to be “blue” — or even light blue — their knowledge and bravery are far too lacking
Taipei’s population is estimated to drop below 2.5 million by the end of this month — the only city among the nation’s six special municipalities that has more people moving out than moving in this year. A city that is classified as a special municipality can have three deputy mayors if it has a population of more than 2.5 million people, Article 55 of the Local Government Act (地方制度法) states. To counter the capital’s shrinking population, Taipei Mayor Chiang Wan-an (蔣萬安) held a cross-departmental population policy committee meeting on Wednesday last week to discuss possible solutions. According to Taipei City Government data, Taipei’s