Taiwan needs an opposition
In Saturday’s rally against President Ma Ying-jeou (馬英九), an estimated 30,000 people took to the street, proclaiming that Taiwan needs to maintain its sovereignty, make government finance more transpar ent, and in particular, improve its economy.
The rally should have gained praise for making use of democratic action. Instead, the rally was distorted by the media, who connected it to support for former president Chen Shui-bian (陳水扁), who is embroiled in allegations of a money-laundering scandal.
In the two weeks since the scandal broke, waves of discontent have been breaking over the Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) and lots of supporters quit the party because they were ashamed of Chen. Some former supporters even hope that the DPP will disappear.
The allegations surrounding Chen did indeed hit the DPP in the gut. However, the DPP is the second-largest party in the nation, and the only counterweight to balance the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT).
If the DPP disappears, chances are that the KMT will be catapulted to a position as the only large party in Taiwan. The lack of a balancing mechanism between parties in Taiwan will jeopardize the nation’s political future. In particular, Ma’s conciliatory China policy requires more constructive criticism by a strong opposition.
Therefore, I call on everyone to calm down. Do not go so far emotionally that you lose the ability to act rationally.
Hisao Wei-Hung
Beitou, Taipei City
A call for ‘bipartisan unity’
The article by Lee Min-yung (李敏勇), “Can Ma’s KMT secure Taiwan’s hereafter?” (Sept. 2, page 8), is inconsistent with Taiwanese history and is irresponsible toward its readers. I am not sure where Lee’s sources come from or if he simply creates an imaginary basis for his rhetoric.
The fact that the writer states, “After 100 days in office, public dissatisfaction with the Ma administration is running high,” is purely a smear tactic aimed at the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) to avoid major embarrassment on the DPP’s side over the political scandal regarding alleged money laundering involving former president Chen Shui-bian (陳水扁).
Determining whether Chen is guilty or not is the job of prosecutors and necessary in order to fight corruption. It is ridiculous for someone such as Lee to invent economic facts and attack President Ma Ying-jeou (馬英九) for not reviving the economy after the previous president literally destroyed it. Ma is not a magician and I am sure educated and responsible Taiwanese are aware of his limits.
As for smearing the KMT as “colonial China,” let me remind Lee that if he really believes in independence and is so ashamed of his Chinese ancestry, then he should change his name, because Lee is Chinese. He should likewise discard Chinese cultural ideas such as eating with chopsticks or drinking tea. After all, Lee describes Taiwan as its own country, and therefore exhibiting Chinese cultural mannerisms makes him a hypocrite.
I believe that Ma is very capable, educated and well spoken. That is what Taiwan needs. The only reason Lee accused Ma of negligence is because he does not understand bipartisan unity. Without the KMT, Taiwan would not have national healthcare.
Dear DPP supporters, it’s time for the men and women of your party to step up and be accountable like in any well adjusted industrial democracy; please do not use smear tactics to sweep your own party’s corruption under the rug.
To answer Lee’s question: Yes, Ma can bring Taiwan to the top again without hurting the sovereignty of Taiwan. The real question is: Does Lee really want the democratically elected president to succeed or is he too anti-Taiwan?
MIKE SHEN
New York
US President Donald Trump has gotten off to a head-spinning start in his foreign policy. He has pressured Denmark to cede Greenland to the United States, threatened to take over the Panama Canal, urged Canada to become the 51st US state, unilaterally renamed the Gulf of Mexico to “the Gulf of America” and announced plans for the United States to annex and administer Gaza. He has imposed and then suspended 25 percent tariffs on Canada and Mexico for their roles in the flow of fentanyl into the United States, while at the same time increasing tariffs on China by 10
Trying to force a partnership between Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co (TSMC) and Intel Corp would be a wildly complex ordeal. Already, the reported request from the Trump administration for TSMC to take a controlling stake in Intel’s US factories is facing valid questions about feasibility from all sides. Washington would likely not support a foreign company operating Intel’s domestic factories, Reuters reported — just look at how that is going over in the steel sector. Meanwhile, many in Taiwan are concerned about the company being forced to transfer its bleeding-edge tech capabilities and give up its strategic advantage. This is especially
US President Donald Trump last week announced plans to impose reciprocal tariffs on eight countries. As Taiwan, a key hub for semiconductor manufacturing, is among them, the policy would significantly affect the country. In response, Minister of Economic Affairs J.W. Kuo (郭智輝) dispatched two officials to the US for negotiations, and Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co’s (TSMC) board of directors convened its first-ever meeting in the US. Those developments highlight how the US’ unstable trade policies are posing a growing threat to Taiwan. Can the US truly gain an advantage in chip manufacturing by reversing trade liberalization? Is it realistic to
Last week, 24 Republican representatives in the US Congress proposed a resolution calling for US President Donald Trump’s administration to abandon the US’ “one China” policy, calling it outdated, counterproductive and not reflective of reality, and to restore official diplomatic relations with Taiwan, enter bilateral free-trade agreement negotiations and support its entry into international organizations. That is an exciting and inspiring development. To help the US government and other nations further understand that Taiwan is not a part of China, that those “one China” policies are contrary to the fact that the two countries across the Taiwan Strait are independent and
RSS