Regardless of whether former president Chen Shui-bian’s (陳水扁) secret offshore bank accounts involve political donations from companies or adjustments in government policy, the corruption scandal has severely damaged Taiwan’s international image and has made the future of well-known Taiwanese corporations highly uncertain. The scandal is affecting not only Chen, his family and the Democratic Progressive Party (DPP), but also the people’s trust in the government and the international market’s faith in the business ethics of Taiwanese companies.
If authorities fail to come up with remedies or reform the system, Taiwan will inevitably receive even further negative exposure in the evaluations of government corruption and business management carried out by international organizations. Under such circumstances, no responsible government or party would have an excuse to obstruct social justice at the expense of their own interests.
We are glad to see Taiwan’s major parties reaffirming their support for the “sunshine bills.” However, prompt and thorough legislation and implementation of the proposed bills is not sufficient, because the bills are merely basic steps to boost society’s trust and the market’s confidence in government. Crackdowns on corruption in Taiwan have always been selective because they have been political in nature and departed from the old saying: “You cannot clap with one hand.”
Strengthening self-regulation within government agencies and reducing the temptation for civil servants to take bribes are only part of the solution. Reforms would be incomplete if we failed to eliminate the incentives for businesses to practice bribery and neglected to make anti-bribery practices part of our agenda.
The prevention of bribery within business is fundamental in the fight against corruption. Therefore, the recent calls from the Ministry of Justice to get businesses to confess to any bribery they may have engaged in is a delayed response and not part of any systematic approach to weeding out corruption. Given the current political situation, this is not a wise move, as businesses and people would most probably avoid confessing to any crimes for fear of the potential consequences.
Even if we can put aside the potential risks of stock market fluctuations and the national financial disorders that such confessions may cause, getting businesses to confess to crimes would be of little benefit to anti-bribery mechanisms and the constant improvement of social trust and competitiveness between businesses. Therefore, the government must pay attention to one of the latest trends in international society, whereby businesses are viewing anti-corruption as a matter of social responsibility.
The joint introduction of Business Principles for Countering Bribery by Transparency International and the Social Accountability International, the establishment of the UN Global Compact, the World Economic Forum’s Partnering Against Corruption Initiative and the Electronic Industry Citizenship Coalition are all examples of the recent realization that businesses need to make anti-corruption their responsibility.
All these measures urge companies not to practice bribery — directly or indirectly — while proposing anti-corruption guidelines. The government must realize that in the era of economic globalization, it must assist companies in managing the business risks caused by corruption, as this is not only vital to their sustainable operation, but also to the enhancement of national competitiveness.
If the government hopes that businesses would assume their social responsibility in the battle against corruption, it should employ a reward and punishment mechanism based on market operation and take the initiative in creating a corruption-free business environment. To achieve this, the government should first refer to international standards on corporate responsibility. It should draw up information disclosure regulations that would be effective in improving anti-bribery policies, risk management for countering bribery, training of employees, political donations by companies and policy lobbying and apply these to every Taiwanese company.
It should also consider getting an independent third party to establish an anti-corruption index, publishing evaluation results regularly as references for financial investors and the public. The Labor Pension Fund and other public pensions should also be included in such evaluations.
In conclusion, the “sunshine bills” are the best way to clean up our government. When our government and political parties handle the issue of political corruption, they must also clean up businesses. Through this, we can wipe away the disgrace we have experienced as a nation, become the least corrupt country in East Asia and set an example of clean business for international investors who value anti-bribery measures. By doing so, Taiwan could give the old saying “clean business is good business” resonance.
Tseng Chao-ming is secretary-general of Corporate Social Responsibility Taiwan.
TRANSLATED BY EDDY CHANG
Trying to force a partnership between Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co (TSMC) and Intel Corp would be a wildly complex ordeal. Already, the reported request from the Trump administration for TSMC to take a controlling stake in Intel’s US factories is facing valid questions about feasibility from all sides. Washington would likely not support a foreign company operating Intel’s domestic factories, Reuters reported — just look at how that is going over in the steel sector. Meanwhile, many in Taiwan are concerned about the company being forced to transfer its bleeding-edge tech capabilities and give up its strategic advantage. This is especially
US President Donald Trump’s second administration has gotten off to a fast start with a blizzard of initiatives focused on domestic commitments made during his campaign. His tariff-based approach to re-ordering global trade in a manner more favorable to the United States appears to be in its infancy, but the significant scale and scope are undeniable. That said, while China looms largest on the list of national security challenges, to date we have heard little from the administration, bar the 10 percent tariffs directed at China, on specific priorities vis-a-vis China. The Congressional hearings for President Trump’s cabinet have, so far,
For years, the use of insecure smart home appliances and other Internet-connected devices has resulted in personal data leaks. Many smart devices require users’ location, contact details or access to cameras and microphones to set up, which expose people’s personal information, but are unnecessary to use the product. As a result, data breaches and security incidents continue to emerge worldwide through smartphone apps, smart speakers, TVs, air fryers and robot vacuums. Last week, another major data breach was added to the list: Mars Hydro, a Chinese company that makes Internet of Things (IoT) devices such as LED grow lights and the
The US Department of State has removed the phrase “we do not support Taiwan independence” in its updated Taiwan-US relations fact sheet, which instead iterates that “we expect cross-strait differences to be resolved by peaceful means, free from coercion, in a manner acceptable to the people on both sides of the Strait.” This shows a tougher stance rejecting China’s false claims of sovereignty over Taiwan. Since switching formal diplomatic recognition from the Republic of China to the People’s Republic of China in 1979, the US government has continually indicated that it “does not support Taiwan independence.” The phrase was removed in 2022
RSS