Shoddy journalistic integrity
Dear Johnny,
In your article “Even worse than ‘taike’ Doritos” (Aug. 23, page 8), you wrote this about the probe into former president Chen Shui-bian (陳水扁): “Now, lots of people are throwing around the term ‘money laundering,’ which is premature. After all, it’s possible A-bian’s right, and these were just leftover campaign crumbs.”
Well, I am not a financial expert and I am quite confident that you aren’t either, therefore I think it’s quite ludicrous for you to even comment on the level of “maturity” of this case in the world of financial scams when you are obviously ignorant of the facts.
Sure, the money could have started as mere leftover campaign funds, as A-bian has claimed, but why route the money all over the world if it is not money laundering?
OK, don’t take my word for it. How about letting a real expert tell you why it is money laundering. Please refer to www.financeasia.com/article.aspx?CIaNID=82971. In this piece, the author has quotes from experienced bankers, unlike your article, which contains nothing but your own unsubstantiated opinions and offensive sarcasms.
Your reluctance to call a spade a spade is a sign of your shoddy journalistic integrity. You claim to be a veteran journalist ... pray tell, where have you worked? A high school year book committee? Church newsletter? If you are so confident with your facts, then why do you hide behind a faux byline like a coward? Why are you so afraid to be accountable for your own substandard product? Why don’t you get off your rear end, go gather some facts and tell the readers why we should consider that this might be a mere tax evasion problem as you have suggested? I am willing to be convinced.
Sharon L. Dailey
Taipei
Johnny replies: I note the article you cite starts with this: “The news that Merrill Lynch may have been involved in possible money laundering by members of the family of Taiwan’s former president, Chen Shuibian [sic], has raised questions about the bank’s internal risk controls.”
So the Finance Asia Web site isn’t quite ready to be the judge, jury and executioner on Chen’s actions or the bank’s role in the affair. Oh, and not one expert it cites is prepared to declare on the record that Chen laundered money. Funny that. In some parts of the world and the World Wide Web, evidence and libel have a role to play in what can be published, you know.
Anyway, readers who are so bored that they would care to re-examine my piece last week would discover that Ms Dailey has misunderstood it, and obviously so, from beginning to end. So I’m not inclined to move my butt from my A-620 Spiritual Spa Massage Chair just yet.
Bear in mind that Minister of Justice Wang Ching-feng (王清峰) recently appeared on a news program anchored by Sisy Chen (陳文茜) in which she made comments about the ongoing probe that may have compromised Chen’s right to a fair trial. Had a minister done the same in a more sober country, any charges against Chen would be thrown out and the minister possibly declared in contempt of court.
So much for “confidence in facts.” Whose facts, exactly?
To The Honorable Legislative Speaker Han Kuo-yu (韓國瑜): We would like to extend our sincerest regards to you for representing Taiwan at the inauguration of US President Donald Trump on Monday. The Taiwanese-American community was delighted to see that Taiwan’s Legislative Yuan speaker not only received an invitation to attend the event, but successfully made the trip to the US. We sincerely hope that you took this rare opportunity to share Taiwan’s achievements in freedom, democracy and economic development with delegations from other countries. In recent years, Taiwan’s economic growth and world-leading technology industry have been a source of pride for Taiwanese-Americans.
Next week, the nation is to celebrate the Lunar New Year break. Unfortunately, cold winds are a-blowing, literally and figuratively. The Central Weather Administration has warned of an approaching cold air mass, while obstinate winds of chaos eddy around the Legislative Yuan. English theologian Thomas Fuller optimistically pointed out in 1650 that “it’s always darkest before the dawn.” We could paraphrase by saying the coldest days are just before the renewed hope of spring. However, one must temper any optimism about the damage being done in the legislature by the opposition Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) and Taiwan People’s Party (TPP), under
To our readers: Due to the Lunar New Year holiday, from Sunday, Jan. 26, through Sunday, Feb. 2, the Taipei Times will have a reduced format without our regular editorials and opinion pieces. From Tuesday to Saturday the paper will not be delivered to subscribers, but will be available for purchase at convenience stores. Subscribers will receive the editions they missed once normal distribution resumes on Sunday, Feb. 2. The paper returns to its usual format on Monday, Feb. 3, when our regular editorials and opinion pieces will also be resumed.
This year would mark the 30th anniversary of the establishment of the India Taipei Association (ITA) in Taipei and the Taipei Economic and Cultural Center (TECC) in New Delhi. From the vision of “Look East” in the 1990s, India’s policy has evolved into a resolute “Act East,” which complements Taiwan’s “New Southbound Policy.” In these three decades, India and Taiwan have forged a rare partnership — one rooted in shared democratic values, a commitment to openness and pluralism, and clear complementarities in trade and technology. The government of India has rolled out the red carpet for Taiwanese investors with attractive financial incentives