Exposing Russia’s weakness
Not since the German invasion of Czechoslovakia have we seen such a blatant violation of the sovereignty of a liberal democratic state (not even in Taiwan — yet) and a slap in the face of the West.
It is vital that the West push back in order to exploit the internal contradictions of the dual-headed Russian government, exposing Russian Prime Minister Vladimir Putin as a dictator and President Dmitry Medvedev as a puppet and forcing the Russians to take a hard look in the mirror as they decide what kind of country they want to live in.
At present, Russia is attempting to expose the West’s internal contradictions — namely the dichotomy between pursuing a liberal democratic world order on the one hand and insisting on a system based on international law and treaties on the other.
NATO’s unilateral action in Kosovo is having much the same effect the US action in Iraq has had. The Russians broke their word in Georgia partly in order to remind the international community how NATO broke its word in Kosovo, Serbia’s Chechnya.
The West is indeed hypocritical in refusing to acknowledge that its insistence on human rights and self-determination is a revolutionary challenge to the status quo.
Even so, Western hypocrisy in Kosovo, Iraq and Taiwan is far preferable to the Russian hypocrisy at work in the Caucasus. By keeping a stranglehold on Georgia, the Russians hope to emasculate the Georgian g asculated the government of former Serbian president Slobodan Milosevic.
It might be imprudent to intervene in an overtly military fashion in the Caucasus at the moment, but it will send a shiver down the spine of every US ally on the frontlines in Europe, the Middle East and Asia and could lead to a resuscitated Russian empire.
Apart from overt military intervention to restore the territorial integrity of Georgia, the only alternative is to do everything in our power to sustain Georgian democracy, and over the long haul, to strengthen military, economic and diplomatic ties in the regions surrounding Russia: in Europe (eg, Ukraine), the Middle East, Central Asia and East Asia, including China.
By doing so, we create an opportunity to pressure the Chinese into doing some hard thinking of their own — to join the fitfully emerging liberal order or stand alongside an unpredictable and explosive Russian regime with nothing to offer but oil.
There is undoubtedly the risk that China would side with Russia, but by doing so, it would have to risk both Taiwan and the international trade that keeps the Chinese regime afloat.
Russia might be gloating over its masterstroke in the Caucasus for the moment and scaring the hell out of small new democracies around Russia and China, but with a touch of audacity and foresight this crisis can be transformed into an opportunity for freedom in both Europe and Asia.
In the meantime, one hopes that the Taiwanese security establishment is taking note of the larger ramifications of Russia’s precipitous action in Georgia.
J. TAVIS OVERSTREET
Chiayi
Concerns that the US might abandon Taiwan are often overstated. While US President Donald Trump’s handling of Ukraine raised unease in Taiwan, it is crucial to recognize that Taiwan is not Ukraine. Under Trump, the US views Ukraine largely as a European problem, whereas the Indo-Pacific region remains its primary geopolitical focus. Taipei holds immense strategic value for Washington and is unlikely to be treated as a bargaining chip in US-China relations. Trump’s vision of “making America great again” would be directly undermined by any move to abandon Taiwan. Despite the rhetoric of “America First,” the Trump administration understands the necessity of
US President Donald Trump’s challenge to domestic American economic-political priorities, and abroad to the global balance of power, are not a threat to the security of Taiwan. Trump’s success can go far to contain the real threat — the Chinese Communist Party’s (CCP) surge to hegemony — while offering expanded defensive opportunities for Taiwan. In a stunning affirmation of the CCP policy of “forceful reunification,” an obscene euphemism for the invasion of Taiwan and the destruction of its democracy, on March 13, 2024, the People’s Liberation Army’s (PLA) used Chinese social media platforms to show the first-time linkage of three new
If you had a vision of the future where China did not dominate the global car industry, you can kiss those dreams goodbye. That is because US President Donald Trump’s promised 25 percent tariff on auto imports takes an ax to the only bits of the emerging electric vehicle (EV) supply chain that are not already dominated by Beijing. The biggest losers when the levies take effect this week would be Japan and South Korea. They account for one-third of the cars imported into the US, and as much as two-thirds of those imported from outside North America. (Mexico and Canada, while
The military is conducting its annual Han Kuang exercises in phases. The minister of national defense recently said that this year’s scenarios would simulate defending the nation against possible actions the Chinese People’s Liberation Army (PLA) might take in an invasion of Taiwan, making the threat of a speculated Chinese invasion in 2027 a heated agenda item again. That year, also referred to as the “Davidson window,” is named after then-US Indo-Pacific Command Admiral Philip Davidson, who in 2021 warned that Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) had instructed the PLA to be ready to invade Taiwan by 2027. Xi in 2017
RSS