Exposing Russia’s weakness
Not since the German invasion of Czechoslovakia have we seen such a blatant violation of the sovereignty of a liberal democratic state (not even in Taiwan — yet) and a slap in the face of the West.
It is vital that the West push back in order to exploit the internal contradictions of the dual-headed Russian government, exposing Russian Prime Minister Vladimir Putin as a dictator and President Dmitry Medvedev as a puppet and forcing the Russians to take a hard look in the mirror as they decide what kind of country they want to live in.
At present, Russia is attempting to expose the West’s internal contradictions — namely the dichotomy between pursuing a liberal democratic world order on the one hand and insisting on a system based on international law and treaties on the other.
NATO’s unilateral action in Kosovo is having much the same effect the US action in Iraq has had. The Russians broke their word in Georgia partly in order to remind the international community how NATO broke its word in Kosovo, Serbia’s Chechnya.
The West is indeed hypocritical in refusing to acknowledge that its insistence on human rights and self-determination is a revolutionary challenge to the status quo.
Even so, Western hypocrisy in Kosovo, Iraq and Taiwan is far preferable to the Russian hypocrisy at work in the Caucasus. By keeping a stranglehold on Georgia, the Russians hope to emasculate the Georgian g asculated the government of former Serbian president Slobodan Milosevic.
It might be imprudent to intervene in an overtly military fashion in the Caucasus at the moment, but it will send a shiver down the spine of every US ally on the frontlines in Europe, the Middle East and Asia and could lead to a resuscitated Russian empire.
Apart from overt military intervention to restore the territorial integrity of Georgia, the only alternative is to do everything in our power to sustain Georgian democracy, and over the long haul, to strengthen military, economic and diplomatic ties in the regions surrounding Russia: in Europe (eg, Ukraine), the Middle East, Central Asia and East Asia, including China.
By doing so, we create an opportunity to pressure the Chinese into doing some hard thinking of their own — to join the fitfully emerging liberal order or stand alongside an unpredictable and explosive Russian regime with nothing to offer but oil.
There is undoubtedly the risk that China would side with Russia, but by doing so, it would have to risk both Taiwan and the international trade that keeps the Chinese regime afloat.
Russia might be gloating over its masterstroke in the Caucasus for the moment and scaring the hell out of small new democracies around Russia and China, but with a touch of audacity and foresight this crisis can be transformed into an opportunity for freedom in both Europe and Asia.
In the meantime, one hopes that the Taiwanese security establishment is taking note of the larger ramifications of Russia’s precipitous action in Georgia.
J. TAVIS OVERSTREET
Chiayi
It is almost three years since Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) and Russian President Vladimir Putin declared a friendship with “no limits” — weeks before Russia’s invasion of Ukraine in February 2022. Since then, they have retreated from such rhetorical enthusiasm. The “no limits” language was quickly dumped, probably at Beijing’s behest. When Putin visited China in May last year, he said that he and his counterpart were “as close as brothers.” Xi more coolly called the Russian president “a good friend and a good neighbor.” China has conspicuously not reciprocated Putin’s description of it as an ally. Yet the partnership
Former US president Jimmy Carter’s legacy regarding Taiwan is a complex tapestry woven with decisions that, while controversial, were instrumental in shaping the nation’s path and its enduring relationship with the US. As the world reflects on Carter’s life and his recent passing at the age of 100, his presidency marked a transformative era in Taiwan-US-China relations, particularly through the landmark decision in 1978 to formally recognize the People’s Republic of China (PRC) as the sole legal government of China, effectively derecognizing the Republic of China (ROC) based in Taiwan. That decision continues to influence geopolitical dynamics and Taiwan’s unique
Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) Chairman Eric Chu (朱立倫) said that he expects this year to be a year of “peace.” However, this is ironic given the actions of some KMT legislators and politicians. To push forward several amendments, they went against the principles of legislation such as substantive deliberation, and even tried to remove obstacles with violence during the third readings of the bills. Chu says that the KMT represents the public interest, accusing President William Lai (賴清德) and the Democratic Progressive Party of fighting against the opposition. After pushing through the amendments, the KMT caucus demanded that Legislative Speaker
On New Year’s Day, it is customary to reflect on what the coming year might bring and how the past has brought about the current juncture. Just as Taiwan is preparing itself for what US president-elect Donald Trump’s second term would mean for its economy, national security and the cross-strait “status quo” this year, the passing of former US president Jimmy Carter on Monday at the age of 100 brought back painful memories of his 1978 decision to stop recognizing the Republic of China as the seat of China in favor of the People’s Republic of China. It is an
RSS