In 1990, Beijing Olympics opening ceremony director Zhang Yimou (張藝謀) had a rare and affecting starring role in A Terra-Cotta Warrior, a fantasy about a Qin Dynasty general pursuing the love of his life over thousands of years.
In the final scene, the latest incarnation of the woman he adores, played by Gong Li (鞏俐), visits the terra-cotta warrior exhibition in Xian as a tourist. Eternally waiting for her among the statues is Zhang — and the credits roll.
This week saw new allegations by the Dalai Lama of a massacre of Tibetans, placing the Olympics under new pressure for providing cover for a government that will not change its terrible ways.
But it was Zhang’s comments to the Chinese media this week that deserve comment here. Given what has happened in the lead-up to the Games, his words have showed him up as a terra-cotta warrior for “rising China” — a man as politically ossified, obnoxious and enslaved as any of his compatriots.
When the creators of the opening ceremony were named, director Steven Spielberg took the heat, largely from actress and Darfur activist Mia Farrow. She warned Spielberg he might become the next Leni Riefenstahl, one of the most talented artists to aid the Nazi regime, for lending the Chinese credibility.
For Spielberg, a Jew who has invested years of his life and money documenting and recreating the horrors of the Holocaust, this was no small accusation. Yet when he had the sense and decency to withdraw, the spotlight — and Riefenstahl tag — did not encumber Zhang, presumably because his Chineseness exempted him from considerations of morality.
This week, basking in his success, Zhang revealed a glimpse of the philosophy that girded the spectacle.
Based on his experiences directing operas in the “West,” Zhang mocked labor rights and the troublesome nature of human rights in general, while gushing on the superiority of the Chinese spirit: “We can make our human performance reach such a level, through hard and smart work. This is something many foreigners cannot achieve.”
For Zhang, it turns out, comparisons with North Korea are a source of pride.
It is likely that Riefenstahl never predicted that the rise of Germany’s National Socialists would set off a chain of war and slaughter on a scale that would turn her into an eternal villain of the industry.
Zhang, on the other hand, is a man all too familiar with China’s modern history of repression, and was himself victimized by the state. He knows that the state and social oppression he depicted in films like To Live continues, though in refined form, much more selectively and with the tacit complicity if not full support of the nouveau riche. Yet he rationalizes suffering as a thing that dignifies his compatriots.
As the Chinese government reaps the propaganda harvest of this Olympics, Zhang is bound to suffer for it outside his country. His personal and artistic agenda sits too easily with the trashing of principles others have defended over countless decades: human rights and freedom from government oppression.
In the context of a country with poor labor protections and widespread abuse, Zhang’s puerile statements on the nature of Chineseness — there is national virtue in bitterness, weakness in individuality and justification for exploitation — deserve to be widely known.
Film festival organizers stunned by Zhang’s casual stereotyping of “Westerners” (probably code for all foreigners) may care to think twice before inviting China’s leading propagandist to their events. Acclaim for Zhang from the “Western” film industry, it seems, offers no insurance against 5,000-year-old prejudice.
Concerns that the US might abandon Taiwan are often overstated. While US President Donald Trump’s handling of Ukraine raised unease in Taiwan, it is crucial to recognize that Taiwan is not Ukraine. Under Trump, the US views Ukraine largely as a European problem, whereas the Indo-Pacific region remains its primary geopolitical focus. Taipei holds immense strategic value for Washington and is unlikely to be treated as a bargaining chip in US-China relations. Trump’s vision of “making America great again” would be directly undermined by any move to abandon Taiwan. Despite the rhetoric of “America First,” the Trump administration understands the necessity of
In an article published on this page on Tuesday, Kaohsiung-based journalist Julien Oeuillet wrote that “legions of people worldwide would care if a disaster occurred in South Korea or Japan, but the same people would not bat an eyelid if Taiwan disappeared.” That is quite a statement. We are constantly reading about the importance of Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co (TSMC), hailed in Taiwan as the nation’s “silicon shield” protecting it from hostile foreign forces such as the Chinese Communist Party (CCP), and so crucial to the global supply chain for semiconductors that its loss would cost the global economy US$1
US President Donald Trump’s challenge to domestic American economic-political priorities, and abroad to the global balance of power, are not a threat to the security of Taiwan. Trump’s success can go far to contain the real threat — the Chinese Communist Party’s (CCP) surge to hegemony — while offering expanded defensive opportunities for Taiwan. In a stunning affirmation of the CCP policy of “forceful reunification,” an obscene euphemism for the invasion of Taiwan and the destruction of its democracy, on March 13, 2024, the People’s Liberation Army’s (PLA) used Chinese social media platforms to show the first-time linkage of three new
Sasha B. Chhabra’s column (“Michelle Yeoh should no longer be welcome,” March 26, page 8) lamented an Instagram post by renowned actress Michelle Yeoh (楊紫瓊) about her recent visit to “Taipei, China.” It is Chhabra’s opinion that, in response to parroting Beijing’s propaganda about the status of Taiwan, Yeoh should be banned from entering this nation and her films cut off from funding by government-backed agencies, as well as disqualified from competing in the Golden Horse Awards. She and other celebrities, he wrote, must be made to understand “that there are consequences for their actions if they become political pawns of
RSS