Less than a month after President Ma Ying-jeou (馬英九) and his administration took office, the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) legislative caucus demanded that the Cabinet conduct a thorough examination of staffers from the former Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) government, with Premier Liu Chao-hsiuan (劉兆玄) promising to come up with an appropriate response to fulfill public expectations.
This was followed by the Cabinet’s order for all ministries to replace officials who cling to the “old mindset” — an apparent reference to the old administration. One official who rejected the KMT administration’s move to purge career civil servants was then deputy secretary-general of the Cabinet Chen Mei-ling (陳美伶), who refused an unexpected transfer to another civil post and chose to retire.
The way the Ma administration has treated the civil service system since its accession to power highlights a serious problem: Even though Taiwan has experienced two transfers of power, the administration still questions the mindset and party loyalties of the nation’s civil servants. The public should pay attention to the possible “chilling effect” that this might have: Civil servants could become obsequious, afraid to speak their mind and assume responsibility for fear of being a target of criticism after a transition of power.
Although the KMT had earlier ruled as an authoritarian party-state regime, it did undertake a complete privatization of the civil service system. It cannot be denied that the DPP also made some changes as to who was employed as civil servants after taking power in 2000 and that better approaches could have been adopted. These are mistakes that the DPP made and we should examine where the party went wrong. Although there was some friction between the administration and the civil service system during its eight years in power, the DPP did put the system on the right path to “nationalization.”
As ruling parties change in a democratic regime, political appointees also come and go. However, career civil servants are different. These are the people that protect a nation’s interests. They are human resources that the nation has cultivated for a long time — an important asset as well as the backbone of the country. These people should not be tainted by any political party nor purged.
Civil officials or public servants play a significant role in a democratic political system. No matter how many times power changes hands or the Cabinet is reshuffled, a solid network of professional civil servants could contribute to government stability. As Taiwan has been through two major power transitions, the majority of civil officials have experienced working under different political parties in power. They are well acquainted with what democracy means and have a strong association with the country. For them, the transfer of power is a democratic norm. Their loyalties lie not with any political party, but with the public. The nation has outstanding civil servants and I cannot understand how those in power can be so hardhearted as to make this group of workers afraid that they might be replaced any time.
The nation has made amazing progress in democracy, but there is still much room for improvement. This is why the DPP has been devoted to pushing forward a new political culture. To end this vicious conflict between the pan-blue and pan-green camps and bring real peace to society, a new political culture should be a goal that all Taiwanese strive for.
A new political culture involves establishing a professional, stable, worry-free and non-partisan civil service system. Public servants should be the backbone of the country instead of a tool for political maneuvering. A ruling party can be replaced, and so can the president. However, professional civil servants and systems should remain fixed to ensure consistency and continuity within the administrative system. Civil officials who assume responsibility for their duties and focus on serving public and national interests are excellent civil servants. They are not a product of the outdated mindsets left behind from the last government, nor should they be scapegoats for the impotence of the current government.
The civil service system is a network of professionals that works on equal division of labor and cooperation. It should not be affiliated with either the pan-green camp or the pan-blue camp. Purging career civil officials will undermine not only their morale but also government stability.
We truly hope that the Ma administration will stop these purges immediately and make this outdated political thinking a thing of the past. Regardless of which party rules in the future, the highest respect should be shown to the civil service system. The promotion of a new political culture following the transfer of power should begin with respecting the professional skills of our civil servants.
Ing-wen Tsai is the Chairperson of the Democratic Progressive Party.
TRANSLATED BY TED YANG
The gutting of Voice of America (VOA) and Radio Free Asia (RFA) by US President Donald Trump’s administration poses a serious threat to the global voice of freedom, particularly for those living under authoritarian regimes such as China. The US — hailed as the model of liberal democracy — has the moral responsibility to uphold the values it champions. In undermining these institutions, the US risks diminishing its “soft power,” a pivotal pillar of its global influence. VOA Tibetan and RFA Tibetan played an enormous role in promoting the strong image of the US in and outside Tibet. On VOA Tibetan,
Sung Chien-liang (宋建樑), the leader of the Chinese Nationalist Party’s (KMT) efforts to recall Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) Legislator Lee Kun-cheng (李坤城), caused a national outrage and drew diplomatic condemnation on Tuesday after he arrived at the New Taipei City District Prosecutors’ Office dressed in a Nazi uniform. Sung performed a Nazi salute and carried a copy of Adolf Hitler’s Mein Kampf as he arrived to be questioned over allegations of signature forgery in the recall petition. The KMT’s response to the incident has shown a striking lack of contrition and decency. Rather than apologizing and distancing itself from Sung’s actions,
US President Trump weighed into the state of America’s semiconductor manufacturing when he declared, “They [Taiwan] stole it from us. They took it from us, and I don’t blame them. I give them credit.” At a prior White House event President Trump hosted TSMC chairman C.C. Wei (魏哲家), head of the world’s largest and most advanced chip manufacturer, to announce a commitment to invest US$100 billion in America. The president then shifted his previously critical rhetoric on Taiwan and put off tariffs on its chips. Now we learn that the Trump Administration is conducting a “trade investigation” on semiconductors which
By now, most of Taiwan has heard Taipei Mayor Chiang Wan-an’s (蔣萬安) threats to initiate a vote of no confidence against the Cabinet. His rationale is that the Democratic Progressive Party (DPP)-led government’s investigation into alleged signature forgery in the Chinese Nationalist Party’s (KMT) recall campaign constitutes “political persecution.” I sincerely hope he goes through with it. The opposition currently holds a majority in the Legislative Yuan, so the initiation of a no-confidence motion and its passage should be entirely within reach. If Chiang truly believes that the government is overreaching, abusing its power and targeting political opponents — then
RSS