Less than a month after President Ma Ying-jeou (馬英九) and his administration took office, the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) legislative caucus demanded that the Cabinet conduct a thorough examination of staffers from the former Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) government, with Premier Liu Chao-hsiuan (劉兆玄) promising to come up with an appropriate response to fulfill public expectations.
This was followed by the Cabinet’s order for all ministries to replace officials who cling to the “old mindset” — an apparent reference to the old administration. One official who rejected the KMT administration’s move to purge career civil servants was then deputy secretary-general of the Cabinet Chen Mei-ling (陳美伶), who refused an unexpected transfer to another civil post and chose to retire.
The way the Ma administration has treated the civil service system since its accession to power highlights a serious problem: Even though Taiwan has experienced two transfers of power, the administration still questions the mindset and party loyalties of the nation’s civil servants. The public should pay attention to the possible “chilling effect” that this might have: Civil servants could become obsequious, afraid to speak their mind and assume responsibility for fear of being a target of criticism after a transition of power.
Although the KMT had earlier ruled as an authoritarian party-state regime, it did undertake a complete privatization of the civil service system. It cannot be denied that the DPP also made some changes as to who was employed as civil servants after taking power in 2000 and that better approaches could have been adopted. These are mistakes that the DPP made and we should examine where the party went wrong. Although there was some friction between the administration and the civil service system during its eight years in power, the DPP did put the system on the right path to “nationalization.”
As ruling parties change in a democratic regime, political appointees also come and go. However, career civil servants are different. These are the people that protect a nation’s interests. They are human resources that the nation has cultivated for a long time — an important asset as well as the backbone of the country. These people should not be tainted by any political party nor purged.
Civil officials or public servants play a significant role in a democratic political system. No matter how many times power changes hands or the Cabinet is reshuffled, a solid network of professional civil servants could contribute to government stability. As Taiwan has been through two major power transitions, the majority of civil officials have experienced working under different political parties in power. They are well acquainted with what democracy means and have a strong association with the country. For them, the transfer of power is a democratic norm. Their loyalties lie not with any political party, but with the public. The nation has outstanding civil servants and I cannot understand how those in power can be so hardhearted as to make this group of workers afraid that they might be replaced any time.
The nation has made amazing progress in democracy, but there is still much room for improvement. This is why the DPP has been devoted to pushing forward a new political culture. To end this vicious conflict between the pan-blue and pan-green camps and bring real peace to society, a new political culture should be a goal that all Taiwanese strive for.
A new political culture involves establishing a professional, stable, worry-free and non-partisan civil service system. Public servants should be the backbone of the country instead of a tool for political maneuvering. A ruling party can be replaced, and so can the president. However, professional civil servants and systems should remain fixed to ensure consistency and continuity within the administrative system. Civil officials who assume responsibility for their duties and focus on serving public and national interests are excellent civil servants. They are not a product of the outdated mindsets left behind from the last government, nor should they be scapegoats for the impotence of the current government.
The civil service system is a network of professionals that works on equal division of labor and cooperation. It should not be affiliated with either the pan-green camp or the pan-blue camp. Purging career civil officials will undermine not only their morale but also government stability.
We truly hope that the Ma administration will stop these purges immediately and make this outdated political thinking a thing of the past. Regardless of which party rules in the future, the highest respect should be shown to the civil service system. The promotion of a new political culture following the transfer of power should begin with respecting the professional skills of our civil servants.
Ing-wen Tsai is the Chairperson of the Democratic Progressive Party.
TRANSLATED BY TED YANG
In their recent op-ed “Trump Should Rein In Taiwan” in Foreign Policy magazine, Christopher Chivvis and Stephen Wertheim argued that the US should pressure President William Lai (賴清德) to “tone it down” to de-escalate tensions in the Taiwan Strait — as if Taiwan’s words are more of a threat to peace than Beijing’s actions. It is an old argument dressed up in new concern: that Washington must rein in Taipei to avoid war. However, this narrative gets it backward. Taiwan is not the problem; China is. Calls for a so-called “grand bargain” with Beijing — where the US pressures Taiwan into concessions
The term “assassin’s mace” originates from Chinese folklore, describing a concealed weapon used by a weaker hero to defeat a stronger adversary with an unexpected strike. In more general military parlance, the concept refers to an asymmetric capability that targets a critical vulnerability of an adversary. China has found its modern equivalent of the assassin’s mace with its high-altitude electromagnetic pulse (HEMP) weapons, which are nuclear warheads detonated at a high altitude, emitting intense electromagnetic radiation capable of disabling and destroying electronics. An assassin’s mace weapon possesses two essential characteristics: strategic surprise and the ability to neutralize a core dependency.
Chinese President and Chinese Communist Party (CCP) Chairman Xi Jinping (習近平) said in a politburo speech late last month that his party must protect the “bottom line” to prevent systemic threats. The tone of his address was grave, revealing deep anxieties about China’s current state of affairs. Essentially, what he worries most about is systemic threats to China’s normal development as a country. The US-China trade war has turned white hot: China’s export orders have plummeted, Chinese firms and enterprises are shutting up shop, and local debt risks are mounting daily, causing China’s economy to flag externally and hemorrhage internally. China’s
During the “426 rally” organized by the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) and the Taiwan People’s Party under the slogan “fight green communism, resist dictatorship,” leaders from the two opposition parties framed it as a battle against an allegedly authoritarian administration led by President William Lai (賴清德). While criticism of the government can be a healthy expression of a vibrant, pluralistic society, and protests are quite common in Taiwan, the discourse of the 426 rally nonetheless betrayed troubling signs of collective amnesia. Specifically, the KMT, which imposed 38 years of martial law in Taiwan from 1949 to 1987, has never fully faced its
RSS