TECO Electric and Machinery Co has recently come under a lot of pressure because its chairman, Liu Chao-kai (劉兆凱), is the younger brother of Premier Liu Chao-shiuan (劉兆玄). As a result, the Bureau of National Health Insurance has decided not to renew its contract with TECO to make the National Health Insurance Card in view of the Civil Servants Conflict of Interest Prevention Act (公職人員利益迴避衝突法).
I could not help thinking about the concept of “original sin” and how this incident reflects the excessive attempts by some people to rectify problems. Do all government officials have to be people without parents, brothers or sisters and no family history? It seems so if they wish to stop people from being jealous and insulting them.
Looking to other countries, Singaporean Prime Minister Lee Hsien Loong’s (李顯龍) brother Lee Hsien-yang (李顯揚) remains chief executive officer of Singapore Telecommunications and continues to serve the public and help develop infrastructure. Jeb Bush, brother of US President George W. Bush, was governor of Florida while their other brother Neil Bush was a cofounder of an e-learning software company. The Bush brothers have served the public and been involved in business, maintaining a separation of public affairs and private benefits. Another example is Hong Kong: When Tung Chee-hwa (董建華) was chief executive, his father’s shipping company continued to operate, even on government business.
In Taiwan, however, there is the “sin” of family relations. A strange anti-business attitude lies behind the idea that the law shall be strictly adhered to, running counter to how business is done in other countries.
I would find it acceptable if the bureau wanted to change the manufacturers of the National Health Insurance Card because the cards were inferior or too expensive, or if they were only used by a minority of people so that a change of manufacturer did not affect the rights of 1.8 million people.
It is not acceptable, however, that the bureau switches manufacturers of the card simply because of a family relationship, because this involves not only changing a manufacturer, but also increasing social disruption and distrust and inflicting major losses on the public.
The health insurance cards are not manufactured by Liu Chao-kai alone. Has anyone considered the rights of the other employees? After having won a tender in accordance with the law and invested in materials and manpower, the company should not be asked to give it all up without compensation — whoever is more suitable should be doing the job. The bureau’s decision may avoid a minor conflict, but it damages overall public welfare. Wasting public resources because of family relationship makes everyone the loser.
On Aug. 1, a newspaper reported that 71.89 percent of business owners said business is worse this year than last year — foreign companies are leaving Taiwan and the information-technology (IT) industry is in a trough. If these companies can’t make money now, they are not likely to return later.
On Aug. 5, the stock price of seven IT companies ranged from NT$6 to NT$13.15. If the IT industry does not get the respect it deserves, if these companies are involved in public non-profit projects and if policies are issued and retracted on a whim, then how will they regain even a basic investment? Soon they will be left with nothing but international contract manufacturing.
If the government’s goal is to only look at the facts and look beyond the pan-green/pan-blue conflict, then society at large should also look only to the facts and not to family relationships.
Rosemary Ho is a former consultant for the Executive Yuan’s IT and Structural Reform Committee.
Translated by Drew Cameron and Perry Svensson
Former US president Jimmy Carter’s legacy regarding Taiwan is a complex tapestry woven with decisions that, while controversial, were instrumental in shaping the nation’s path and its enduring relationship with the US. As the world reflects on Carter’s life and his recent passing at the age of 100, his presidency marked a transformative era in Taiwan-US-China relations, particularly through the landmark decision in 1978 to formally recognize the People’s Republic of China (PRC) as the sole legal government of China, effectively derecognizing the Republic of China (ROC) based in Taiwan. That decision continues to influence geopolitical dynamics and Taiwan’s unique
Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) Chairman Eric Chu (朱立倫) said that he expects this year to be a year of “peace.” However, this is ironic given the actions of some KMT legislators and politicians. To push forward several amendments, they went against the principles of legislation such as substantive deliberation, and even tried to remove obstacles with violence during the third readings of the bills. Chu says that the KMT represents the public interest, accusing President William Lai (賴清德) and the Democratic Progressive Party of fighting against the opposition. After pushing through the amendments, the KMT caucus demanded that Legislative Speaker
On New Year’s Day, it is customary to reflect on what the coming year might bring and how the past has brought about the current juncture. Just as Taiwan is preparing itself for what US president-elect Donald Trump’s second term would mean for its economy, national security and the cross-strait “status quo” this year, the passing of former US president Jimmy Carter on Monday at the age of 100 brought back painful memories of his 1978 decision to stop recognizing the Republic of China as the seat of China in favor of the People’s Republic of China. It is an
Beijing’s approval of a controversial mega-dam in the lower reaches of the Yarlung Tsangpo River — which flows from Tibet — has ignited widespread debate over its strategic and environmental implications. The project exacerbates the complexities of India-China relations, and underscores Beijing’s push for hydropower dominance and potential weaponization of water against India. India and China are caught in a protracted territorial dispute along the Line of Actual Control. The approval of a dam on a transboundary river adds another layer to an already strained bilateral relationship, making dialogue and trust-building even more challenging, especially given that the two Asian
RSS