TECO Electric and Machinery Co has recently come under a lot of pressure because its chairman, Liu Chao-kai (劉兆凱), is the younger brother of Premier Liu Chao-shiuan (劉兆玄). As a result, the Bureau of National Health Insurance has decided not to renew its contract with TECO to make the National Health Insurance Card in view of the Civil Servants Conflict of Interest Prevention Act (公職人員利益迴避衝突法).
I could not help thinking about the concept of “original sin” and how this incident reflects the excessive attempts by some people to rectify problems. Do all government officials have to be people without parents, brothers or sisters and no family history? It seems so if they wish to stop people from being jealous and insulting them.
Looking to other countries, Singaporean Prime Minister Lee Hsien Loong’s (李顯龍) brother Lee Hsien-yang (李顯揚) remains chief executive officer of Singapore Telecommunications and continues to serve the public and help develop infrastructure. Jeb Bush, brother of US President George W. Bush, was governor of Florida while their other brother Neil Bush was a cofounder of an e-learning software company. The Bush brothers have served the public and been involved in business, maintaining a separation of public affairs and private benefits. Another example is Hong Kong: When Tung Chee-hwa (董建華) was chief executive, his father’s shipping company continued to operate, even on government business.
In Taiwan, however, there is the “sin” of family relations. A strange anti-business attitude lies behind the idea that the law shall be strictly adhered to, running counter to how business is done in other countries.
I would find it acceptable if the bureau wanted to change the manufacturers of the National Health Insurance Card because the cards were inferior or too expensive, or if they were only used by a minority of people so that a change of manufacturer did not affect the rights of 1.8 million people.
It is not acceptable, however, that the bureau switches manufacturers of the card simply because of a family relationship, because this involves not only changing a manufacturer, but also increasing social disruption and distrust and inflicting major losses on the public.
The health insurance cards are not manufactured by Liu Chao-kai alone. Has anyone considered the rights of the other employees? After having won a tender in accordance with the law and invested in materials and manpower, the company should not be asked to give it all up without compensation — whoever is more suitable should be doing the job. The bureau’s decision may avoid a minor conflict, but it damages overall public welfare. Wasting public resources because of family relationship makes everyone the loser.
On Aug. 1, a newspaper reported that 71.89 percent of business owners said business is worse this year than last year — foreign companies are leaving Taiwan and the information-technology (IT) industry is in a trough. If these companies can’t make money now, they are not likely to return later.
On Aug. 5, the stock price of seven IT companies ranged from NT$6 to NT$13.15. If the IT industry does not get the respect it deserves, if these companies are involved in public non-profit projects and if policies are issued and retracted on a whim, then how will they regain even a basic investment? Soon they will be left with nothing but international contract manufacturing.
If the government’s goal is to only look at the facts and look beyond the pan-green/pan-blue conflict, then society at large should also look only to the facts and not to family relationships.
Rosemary Ho is a former consultant for the Executive Yuan’s IT and Structural Reform Committee.
Translated by Drew Cameron and Perry Svensson
A return to power for former US president Donald Trump would pose grave risks to Taiwan’s security, autonomy and the broader stability of the Indo-Pacific region. The stakes have never been higher as China aggressively escalates its pressure on Taiwan, deploying economic, military and psychological tactics aimed at subjugating the nation under Beijing’s control. The US has long acted as Taiwan’s foremost security partner, a bulwark against Chinese expansionism in the region. However, a second Trump presidency could upend decades of US commitments, introducing unpredictability that could embolden Beijing and severely compromise Taiwan’s position. While president, Trump’s foreign policy reflected a transactional
Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) has prioritized modernizing the Chinese People’s Liberation Army (PLA) to rival the US military, with many experts believing he would not act on Taiwan until the PLA is fully prepared to confront US forces. At the Chinese Communist Party’s 20th Party Congress in 2022, Xi emphasized accelerating this modernization, setting 2027 — the PLA’s centennial — as the new target, replacing the previous 2035 goal. US intelligence agencies said that Xi has directed the PLA to be ready for a potential invasion of Taiwan by 2027, although no decision on launching an attack had been made. Whether
A chip made by Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co (TSMC) was found on a Huawei Technologies Co artificial intelligence (AI) processor, indicating a possible breach of US export restrictions that have been in place since 2019 on sensitive tech to the Chinese firm and others. The incident has triggered significant concern in the IT industry, as it appears that proxy buyers are acting on behalf of restricted Chinese companies to bypass the US rules, which are intended to protect its national security. Canada-based research firm TechInsights conducted a die analysis of the Huawei Ascend 910B AI Trainer, releasing its findings on Oct.
In honor of President Jimmy Carter’s 100th birthday, my longtime friend and colleague John Tkacik wrote an excellent op-ed reassessing Carter’s derecognition of Taipei. But I would like to add my own thoughts on this often-misunderstood president. During Carter’s single term as president of the United States from 1977 to 1981, despite numerous foreign policy and domestic challenges, he is widely recognized for brokering the historic 1978 Camp David Accords that ended the state of war between Egypt and Israel after more than three decades of hostilities. It is considered one of the most significant diplomatic achievements of the 20th century.