If he were alive today, famed Chinese intellectual, reformer and Chinese Communist Party co-founder Chen Duxiu (陳獨秀) would be impressed by the technological and economic advances that China has made, particularly since the demise of Mao Zedong (毛澤東). “Mr Science,” a term he made famous, has been served well. If, however, in this Olympic season, Chen were to talk to fellow intellectuals who did not fear to speak out against the leadership — and there are few such people on Chinese soil these days — he would surely be disturbed by the fate of Mr Science’s supposedly inseparable partner, “Mr Democracy.”
For most people, the Olympics are not about the individual sports, because most are forgotten about until the next Games roll around. They are not about gleaming infrastructure and temporary urban beautification, nor about the corporate impact of Games sponsors, nor even about the daily pollution index.
For most people the Olympics are about spectacle and emotion in top-class competition. And meaningful competition requires fairness, discipline and mutual respect.
In preparing these Games, China has invested extensively in infrastructure and security and even run campaigns teaching ordinary Beijing people how to act in a more “cultivated” manner. But in the process it has exploited undemocratic means to mistreat Chinese people not deemed worthy of fairness, discipline and respect: minorities, the unemployed, evictees, religious groups, illegally disenfranchised landowners and all the rest. And Beijing has shown precious little sign that it will change any of this out of association with the Olympic movement.
China’s ghastly and disgusting support for the tyrants in Sudan, Zimbabwe and Myanmar, despite the conspicuous suffering in those countries, could have derailed the Olympics. Only a disaster on the scale of the Sichuan earthquake could have salvaged any sense of sympathy for the Chinese agenda.
The Games may proceed without incident, though it is notable that the government has leapt at the opportunity to publicize a threat from Muslim extremists largely outside the country to smear the legitimate concerns of the Uighur people in Xinjiang.
Well-meaning Chinese have dreamed that the Games could help show China’s true face and earn the affection and respect of foreign visitors and athletes. Sadly for them, the true face has been shown. It started with grim paramilitary goons in blue tracksuits accompanying the Olympic torch on its embarrassing tour of democratic countries. And now the Games begin with broken promises on press freedom and shipping in party members to forcibly replace ordinary Chinese hoping to see the torch relay.
The paradox of China, it seems, will endure: It demands congratulation and recognition from the “one world” of the Olympic slogan for its achievements, but refuses to accept criticism for its failures and its degenerate aspects. “No interference in other countries’ internal affairs” is the other slogan: China wants everything and will concede nothing.
The conclusion can only be that today’s China is, in spirit, the same China that Lu Xun (魯迅) parodied in the first decades of last century: insecure, petulant, hypocritical, cynical and oppressive, despite seemingly limitless potential. In some ways, China may be devolving as new wealth and old power join hands to defend the political status quo and oppose reforms that would benefit all Chinese.
The authorities therefore must mask their refusal to meet the basic challenge underlying the opportunity they were granted in 2001: showing the world that China can have a civilized government.
So, let the spin begin.
Prior to marrying a Taiwanese and moving to Taiwan, a Chinese woman, surnamed Zhang (張), used her elder sister’s identity to deceive Chinese officials and obtain a resident identity card in China. After marrying a Taiwanese, surnamed Chen (陳) and applying to move to Taiwan, Zhang continued to impersonate her sister to obtain a Republic of China ID card. She used the false identity in Taiwan for 18 years. However, a judge ruled that her case does not constitute forgery and acquitted her. Does this mean that — as long as a sibling agrees — people can impersonate others to alter, forge
Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) lawmakers on Monday unilaterally passed a preliminary review of proposed amendments to the Public Officers Election and Recall Act (公職人員選罷法) in just one minute, while Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) legislators, government officials and the media were locked out. The hasty and discourteous move — the doors of the Internal Administration Committee chamber were locked and sealed with plastic wrap before the preliminary review meeting began — was a great setback for Taiwan’s democracy. Without any legislative discussion or public witnesses, KMT Legislator Hsu Hsin-ying (徐欣瑩), the committee’s convener, began the meeting at 9am and announced passage of the
In the weeks following the 2024 US presidential election, I have received one question more than any other from friends in Taiwan — how will Donald J. Trump’s return to the White House affect Taiwan and cross-Strait relations? Some Taiwan counterparts have argued that Trump hates China, so therefore he will support Taiwan, according to the logic that the enemy of one’s enemy is a friend. Others have expressed anxiety that Trump will put pressure on Taiwan to dramatically increase defense spending, or to compensate the United States for allegedly “stealing” America’s semiconductor sector. While I understand these hopes and concerns, I
In response to a failure to understand the “good intentions” behind the use of the term “motherland,” a professor from China’s Fudan University recklessly claimed that Taiwan used to be a colony, so all it needs is a “good beating.” Such logic is risible. The Central Plains people in China were once colonized by the Mongolians, the Manchus and other foreign peoples — does that mean they also deserve a “good beating?” According to the professor, having been ruled by the Cheng Dynasty — named after its founder, Ming-loyalist Cheng Cheng-kung (鄭成功, also known as Koxinga) — as the Kingdom of Tungning,