Taiwan’s Public Television Service (PTS) may not be able to issue paychecks to its employees until October. It turns out that an attempt by lawmakers in the legislature’s Education and Culture Committee (ECC) to boycott the budget of the Government Information Office (GIO) led to a freeze of half the annual NT$900 million (US$29 million) budget that the GIO allocates each year to the PTS Foundation.
After the transfer of power to the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT), the ECC lifted its boycott of other GIO budgets, but has not followed suit with the PTS budget, which remains frozen.
While the legislature has the right to review and freeze budgets, legislators are using the PTS to sharpen their swords by continuing to freeze a budget that has been legally allocated. No matter how legitimate their reasons, this sets a bad example of political interference in the media.
A comprehensive survey on the sources of funding for public television services in other countries shows that licensing fees, government allocations and advertising income are the major sources of funds.
For example, in the UK, Sweden, Finland, Denmark, Norway and Japan, the main source of funding for public TV is licensing fees collected from every household with a television. In Australia, Canada, Hong Kong and Taiwan, on the other hand, government allocations are the major source of funding; and in Spain, advertising income accounts for the majority.
Some other countries provide funding from supplementary taxes such as an electricity tax surcharge in Turkey, a tobacco tax surcharge in Thailand, and an income tax surcharge in the Netherlands. Sources of funding have also changed. For instance, New Zealand and the Netherlands abolished the collection of licensing fees from the public in 1988 and 2000 respectively, and switched to other approaches to fund public TV.
No matter where funding comes from, most countries have made laws to guarantee that it increases in step with movements in the consumer price index. The thinking behind this approach is simply a wish to guarantee the stability of public TV without interference from a country’s government or legislature.
However, the fact that in Taiwan the legislature has blocked the budget and then refused to unfreeze it constitutes a practice of inappropriate meddling.
Some reasons why legislators have yet to unfreeze the annual budget for the PTS is because they allegedly received internal letters questioning how the PTS uses its facilities. The letters accuse the public television station of discarding equipment before it should be written off. However, the legislature cannot use these claims as an excuse for keeping the budget frozen.
The legislature has the right and the duty to supervise the PTS in order to promote beneficial activities and eliminate irregularities and to maintain the healthy development of the PTS. However, it cannot intervene in and obstruct the independent and normal operations of the PTS in any way, and, more importantly, it should not have frozen the budget in the first place.
The move begs the question: How can the PTS continue to carry out its responsibilities as a public medium to supervise the government and the legislature without being paid? The legislature should unfreeze the PTS budget immediately and complete the amendment for the Public Broadcasting Act (公共廣播電視法) to help the station grow stronger rather than use supervision as an excuse to strangle it.
Lo Shih-hung is an associate professor of communications and chairman of the Department of Communications at National Chung Cheng University.
Translated by Ted Yang
Trying to force a partnership between Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co (TSMC) and Intel Corp would be a wildly complex ordeal. Already, the reported request from the Trump administration for TSMC to take a controlling stake in Intel’s US factories is facing valid questions about feasibility from all sides. Washington would likely not support a foreign company operating Intel’s domestic factories, Reuters reported — just look at how that is going over in the steel sector. Meanwhile, many in Taiwan are concerned about the company being forced to transfer its bleeding-edge tech capabilities and give up its strategic advantage. This is especially
US President Donald Trump’s second administration has gotten off to a fast start with a blizzard of initiatives focused on domestic commitments made during his campaign. His tariff-based approach to re-ordering global trade in a manner more favorable to the United States appears to be in its infancy, but the significant scale and scope are undeniable. That said, while China looms largest on the list of national security challenges, to date we have heard little from the administration, bar the 10 percent tariffs directed at China, on specific priorities vis-a-vis China. The Congressional hearings for President Trump’s cabinet have, so far,
US political scientist Francis Fukuyama, during an interview with the UK’s Times Radio, reacted to US President Donald Trump’s overturning of decades of US foreign policy by saying that “the chance for serious instability is very great.” That is something of an understatement. Fukuyama said that Trump’s apparent moves to expand US territory and that he “seems to be actively siding with” authoritarian states is concerning, not just for Europe, but also for Taiwan. He said that “if I were China I would see this as a golden opportunity” to annex Taiwan, and that every European country needs to think
For years, the use of insecure smart home appliances and other Internet-connected devices has resulted in personal data leaks. Many smart devices require users’ location, contact details or access to cameras and microphones to set up, which expose people’s personal information, but are unnecessary to use the product. As a result, data breaches and security incidents continue to emerge worldwide through smartphone apps, smart speakers, TVs, air fryers and robot vacuums. Last week, another major data breach was added to the list: Mars Hydro, a Chinese company that makes Internet of Things (IoT) devices such as LED grow lights and the