The rage for sushi and sashimi, Japan’s raw fish dishes that overtook the West and have now spread to increasingly prosperous China, risks wiping out one of the Mediterranean’s most emblematic residents: the bluefin tuna.
Experts say too many of these majestic fish prized since Greek and Roman times — each one of which can weigh up to 900kg — are ending up on the platters of restaurants around the globe.
“Japanese consumption was already a threat to bluefin tuna in the Mediterranean. The European craze for sushi bars has added to that,” said Roberto Mielgo Bregazzi, a Spanish expert and author of several reports for Greenpeace and the World Wildlife Fund.
”If the Chinese market continues to grow, that will be the end of the stock,” he said.
Eating Japanese-style raw fish in rice packages spread to Europe and the US in the 1990s and quickly grabbed palates there.
China seems to be next, said Bregazzi who added that there had been a significant increase in tuna consumption there in the past six years.
Even though there are few official figures on Chinese consumption, the trend has also been observed by the International Commission for the Conservation of Atlantic Tunas (ICCAT), a body responsible for managing bluefin tuna fishing.
Japan, however, remains the main consumer of bluefin tuna.
“Around 80 percent to 85 percent of bluefin tuna caught in the Mediterranean is exported to Japan,” said Jean-Marc Fromentin, a leading worldwide expert on the subject at the French Research Institute for Exploitation of the Sea.
Sushi consumption took off after World War II, largely using southern bluefish tuna then found in huge numbers off the coast of Australia.
“This stock has now collapsed thanks to over-fishing, and the Japanese turned their attention to the Atlantic bluefin tuna,” said Fromentin, adding that despite its name, Atlantic bluefin comes mainly from the Mediterranean.
Prices began to climb. Fishing fleets were modernized in Europe and new fishing fleets were created in Turkey and northern Africa. The result — a huge overcapacity in fishing.
Today more than 50,000 tonnes of bluefin tuna are caught every year in the Mediterranean. To prevent stocks from collapsing, that figure should be limited to 15,000 tonnes in the short term, ICCAT said.
“The bluefin tuna industry is in the process of fishing itself to death,” Greenpeace oceans campaigner Karli Thomas said.
The risk now is that the depletion of tuna will wipe out the fishing sector, and cost thousands of jobs in the Mediterranean region.
In May and June, fishermen from France, Italy, Libya, Malta, Spain, Tunisia and Turkey are under pressure to maximize their catch. Most use a net called a “purse seine,” which is weighted to reach the sea floor, with hoops and ropes which allow the fishermen to pull the drawstrings and trap the bluefin tuna within the net.
They work out of ultra-modern trawlers, up to 60m long and costing around 5 million euros (US$8 million).
At this point in the chain, a kilo of bluefin tuna fetches the fisherman between 8 euros and 10 euros. The catch is sold to tuna fattening farms, many located in Cypriot, Croatian, Maltese, Sicilian, Spanish and Tunisian waters and many owned by Japanese companies like Mitsubishi, Maruha or Mitsui or the Spanish group Ricardo Fuentes e Hijos.
The tuna are transported to these offshore farms in huge circular cages 50m in diameter and 23m deep. Once in the tuna farms, or ranches as they are sometimes known, the tuna gorge on tonnes of sardines, mackerel and herring.
This boosts their weight to the demands of the Japanese buyers. Some farms also feed the tuna freeze-dried garlic to stimulate their blood circulation or prawns to boost their reddish tinge.
It takes between 9kg and 20kg of small fish to put 1kg of weight on a bluefin tuna, said a co-owner of the Fish and Fish Farm in Malta, Joseph Caruana.
The fattened tuna are then sold at around 13 euros per kilogram to Japanese buyers, who in turn sell them for a much higher price in Tokyo — where a good quality, 200kg tuna can fetch up to 20,000 euros.
“It is the big firms that push the fishermen into over-fishing,” Bregazzi said.
In theory, the bluefin tuna harvest is monitored so that the ICCAT quotas are respected, but there are numerous flaws.
This year, the European Commission — the EU executive — has clamped down somewhat. Fishing was even put on hold for 15 days for some countries — a decision that infuriated French and Italian fishing fleets in particular.
“But the Turkish tuna seiners continued to fish, and there is always the illegal fishing by Japan and [South] Korea,” French fisherman Andre Fortassier said.
Fishing and farms have also developed in non-EU countries in recent years, including Libya, Tunisia and Algeria where quota controls tend to be looser, industry sources said.
For Sergi Tudela, a Spanish marine biologist with Worldwide Fund for Nature, the responsibility lies with ICCAT.
“If important parties in ICCAT such as the US, the European Union and Japan decide to put an end to this unsustainable situation and to adopt real recovery measures, the other countries should accept them,” he said.
“Japan is the key market. If there is a real willingness from Japan to ensure that only real sustainable production is being imported, they can implement that,” Tudela said.
“The potentiality is there, it only lacks political will,” he said.
Concerns that the US might abandon Taiwan are often overstated. While US President Donald Trump’s handling of Ukraine raised unease in Taiwan, it is crucial to recognize that Taiwan is not Ukraine. Under Trump, the US views Ukraine largely as a European problem, whereas the Indo-Pacific region remains its primary geopolitical focus. Taipei holds immense strategic value for Washington and is unlikely to be treated as a bargaining chip in US-China relations. Trump’s vision of “making America great again” would be directly undermined by any move to abandon Taiwan. Despite the rhetoric of “America First,” the Trump administration understands the necessity of
In an article published on this page on Tuesday, Kaohsiung-based journalist Julien Oeuillet wrote that “legions of people worldwide would care if a disaster occurred in South Korea or Japan, but the same people would not bat an eyelid if Taiwan disappeared.” That is quite a statement. We are constantly reading about the importance of Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co (TSMC), hailed in Taiwan as the nation’s “silicon shield” protecting it from hostile foreign forces such as the Chinese Communist Party (CCP), and so crucial to the global supply chain for semiconductors that its loss would cost the global economy US$1
US President Donald Trump’s challenge to domestic American economic-political priorities, and abroad to the global balance of power, are not a threat to the security of Taiwan. Trump’s success can go far to contain the real threat — the Chinese Communist Party’s (CCP) surge to hegemony — while offering expanded defensive opportunities for Taiwan. In a stunning affirmation of the CCP policy of “forceful reunification,” an obscene euphemism for the invasion of Taiwan and the destruction of its democracy, on March 13, 2024, the People’s Liberation Army’s (PLA) used Chinese social media platforms to show the first-time linkage of three new
Sasha B. Chhabra’s column (“Michelle Yeoh should no longer be welcome,” March 26, page 8) lamented an Instagram post by renowned actress Michelle Yeoh (楊紫瓊) about her recent visit to “Taipei, China.” It is Chhabra’s opinion that, in response to parroting Beijing’s propaganda about the status of Taiwan, Yeoh should be banned from entering this nation and her films cut off from funding by government-backed agencies, as well as disqualified from competing in the Golden Horse Awards. She and other celebrities, he wrote, must be made to understand “that there are consequences for their actions if they become political pawns of
RSS