If there were any upside to the passage of Typhoon Fung-wong earlier this week, it was its exposure of the manner in which taxpayers’ money is being spent by Taitung County Commissioner Kuang Li-chen (鄺麗貞).
Despite forecasts that the typhoon would sweep through Taiwan from the east coast, Kuang went ahead with her scheduled trip to Europe last Wednesday.
Coming to Kuang’s defense, the Taitung County Government argued that the delegation had departed days before the Central Weather Bureau issued a typhoon alert.
This explanation is disingenuous, however, because it was already known at the time that a serious storm was headed toward Taitung. And it is the role of a commissioner to be there when locals need her or, to use President Ma Ying-jeou’s (馬英九) words, “to feel the pain of the people.”
With the typhoon behind us, we must now turn to what Kuang has been doing with government coffers and how she has spent money on her overseas “business” trips.
While the Taitung County Government faces a deficit of NT$6.1 billion (US$200 million) and lacks the budget to even update its tourism brochures, Kuang has spent millions in the past two years on overseas trips inspecting other countries’ municipal development.
Since her election as county commissioner in April 2006 — with the endorsement of then Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) chairman Ma — Kuang has made eight “overseas business trips.”
In 2006, taxpayers footed the bill for her trip to Japan, followed by visits to Greece and Egypt, at a total cost of NT$2.49 million in taxpayers’ money. Kuang made trips to Japan and Hong Kong the following year, followed by an eight-day trip to the UK before she embarked on another visit, this time to Thailand. Taxpayers then paid NT$1.3 million for her trip to New Zealand in April this year, as well as NT$1.5 million for her ongoing 13-day tour in Europe.
And that’s not all. After she comes back, the flight-attendant-turned-commissioner is expected to embark on a trip to Beijing next month for the Beijing Olympics, with a separate trip to Zhejiang Province being planned for September.
Given all this globetrotting, Kuang would be better positioned to write for Lonely Planet than to pen a revised tourism brochure for her county.
The numbers speak for themselves. In the past two years, the county has hosted two large-scale tourism fairs, which brought in some 200,000 tourists and generated NT$400 million. Those numbers, however, pale in comparison with Hualien County, which during the same period hosted more than 10 large-scale tourism fairs and attracted 1 million tourists, who spent an estimated NT$2.1 billion.
Kuang and the Taitung County Government maintain that her trips are meant to better equip her to promote Taitung as a fun tourism destination.
However one looks at it, it is she who seems to be having all the fun.
Concerns that the US might abandon Taiwan are often overstated. While US President Donald Trump’s handling of Ukraine raised unease in Taiwan, it is crucial to recognize that Taiwan is not Ukraine. Under Trump, the US views Ukraine largely as a European problem, whereas the Indo-Pacific region remains its primary geopolitical focus. Taipei holds immense strategic value for Washington and is unlikely to be treated as a bargaining chip in US-China relations. Trump’s vision of “making America great again” would be directly undermined by any move to abandon Taiwan. Despite the rhetoric of “America First,” the Trump administration understands the necessity of
US President Donald Trump’s challenge to domestic American economic-political priorities, and abroad to the global balance of power, are not a threat to the security of Taiwan. Trump’s success can go far to contain the real threat — the Chinese Communist Party’s (CCP) surge to hegemony — while offering expanded defensive opportunities for Taiwan. In a stunning affirmation of the CCP policy of “forceful reunification,” an obscene euphemism for the invasion of Taiwan and the destruction of its democracy, on March 13, 2024, the People’s Liberation Army’s (PLA) used Chinese social media platforms to show the first-time linkage of three new
If you had a vision of the future where China did not dominate the global car industry, you can kiss those dreams goodbye. That is because US President Donald Trump’s promised 25 percent tariff on auto imports takes an ax to the only bits of the emerging electric vehicle (EV) supply chain that are not already dominated by Beijing. The biggest losers when the levies take effect this week would be Japan and South Korea. They account for one-third of the cars imported into the US, and as much as two-thirds of those imported from outside North America. (Mexico and Canada, while
I have heard people equate the government’s stance on resisting forced unification with China or the conditional reinstatement of the military court system with the rise of the Nazis before World War II. The comparison is absurd. There is no meaningful parallel between the government and Nazi Germany, nor does such a mindset exist within the general public in Taiwan. It is important to remember that the German public bore some responsibility for the horrors of the Holocaust. Post-World War II Germany’s transitional justice efforts were rooted in a national reckoning and introspection. Many Jews were sent to concentration camps not
RSS