Duke's pub in downtown Cairo is supposed to provide a slice of English comfort amid the noise and pollution of the Arab world's biggest city. There are soft green leather furnishings and a beautifully polished oak bar, but the most essential ingredient — alcohol — is conspicuous by its absence.
Amir, the pub’s gray-haired bartender, stared disconsolately at a display of fruit syrups behind the counter.
“What’s an English pub without beer?” he sighed.
Duke’s has been dry since May, when staff at the Grand Hyatt hotel complex, which houses the pub, were ordered to empty every last bottle of booze on the premises into the Nile.
Cases of the finest cognac and champagne in the region were among the casualties, with local press reports suggesting that up to US$1 million in alcohol was washed away.
The man behind the move is the hotel’s owner, Saudi Sheikh Abdel Aziz Ibrahim, who has decided to make all his business interests alcohol-free.
Now, the sheikh is locked in a three-way tussle with the Global Hyatt Corporation and the Egyptian tourist authorities, a skirmish that reveals much about the religious and cultural dilemmas facing modern Egypt.
Ibrahim’s decision provoked a furore when it became public, dividing opinion within a society that has become ostentatiously more religious in recent decades.
Newspaper columnists condemned the move as a betrayal of Cairo’s reputation as a freewheeling capital of liberal tolerance, warning that the removal of alcohol from luxury hotels could have a catastrophic effect on Egypt’s vital tourist industry.
Supporters of Ibrahim insisted that foreign visitors must respect Muslim cultural norms.
For its part, the Egyptian Tourist Federation has announced it will shortly strip the hotel of its five-star status.
“It’s a clear-cut game of regulations,” a spokesperson said. “If you go dry, your rating goes down.”
The international Hyatt group, which manages the hotel, has been in furious negotiations with Ibrahim ever since.
The issue has brought to the surface the simmering resentment held by many Cairenes against the oil-rich Gulf Arabs who pour into their city each summer and who are rapidly buying up vast swathes of the Egyptian entertainment sector.
Many forms of entertainment, from film studios to belly-dancers, have been snapped up by petrodollars and although the Saudi investment provides a much-needed injection of cash into the ailing Egyptian economy, critics fear that the changing cultural landscape — dancers are now covering up and films are avoiding scenes of hugging or kissing — is being used as a vehicle to spread the strict form of Wahhabi Islam prevalent in the Gulf.
Egypt has traditionally been characterized by a more moderate brand of Sunni Islam that has allowed “un-Islamic” institutions such as hotel bars to flourish in Cairo. Yet commentators say the ongoing crackdown against the Muslim Brotherhood, the country’s largest Islamic political movement that is formally banned from parliament, has left Egyptian society susceptible to Wahhabism and its assault on “prurient” cultural pastimes.
“The people want their religious needs fulfilled but a vacuum exists because moderate Islamic movements like the Muslim Brotherhood aren’t allowed to operate freely by the regime,” said Fahmy Howeidy, a prominent Islamic thinker and popular newspaper columnist in Egypt.
Although Howeidy believed the Grand Hyatt row was a relatively isolated incident, he warned that government attacks on the Muslim Brotherhood could undermine the liberal conception of Islam long-entrenched in Egyptian society which, he said, had stopped radical groups such as al-Qaeda from winning over large sections of the population.
“The Hyatt alcohol ban is an exceptional case,” he said, “but it should remind us that the government needs to act to prevent exceptional cases like this happening again.”
Back at the Grand Hyatt, Norwegian tourist Liv Jensen was leading her dejected husband and daughter down to the Hard Rock Cafe, the last bastion of intoxication left on the site.
“Who would have thought an international hotel like this wouldn’t serve us a drink?” she said as they entered the restaurant.
Hard Rock, which is separately owned and thus not under Ibrahim’s jurisdiction, has seen business boom since May.
Meanwhile, in Duke’s bar, Amir rearranged the coffee cups and paced the deserted establishment.
“We don’t get many customers anymore,” he said.
The 52-year-old was scathing about the influence of the Saudis.
“It’s an act, just for show,” he says, referring to the religious proselytizing of the sheikh and his compatriots.
“I don’t know what I’m going to do. I’ve been pulling pints and mixing cocktails here for 15 years, and I’m too old now to move on,” he said.
Concerns that the US might abandon Taiwan are often overstated. While US President Donald Trump’s handling of Ukraine raised unease in Taiwan, it is crucial to recognize that Taiwan is not Ukraine. Under Trump, the US views Ukraine largely as a European problem, whereas the Indo-Pacific region remains its primary geopolitical focus. Taipei holds immense strategic value for Washington and is unlikely to be treated as a bargaining chip in US-China relations. Trump’s vision of “making America great again” would be directly undermined by any move to abandon Taiwan. Despite the rhetoric of “America First,” the Trump administration understands the necessity of
In an article published on this page on Tuesday, Kaohsiung-based journalist Julien Oeuillet wrote that “legions of people worldwide would care if a disaster occurred in South Korea or Japan, but the same people would not bat an eyelid if Taiwan disappeared.” That is quite a statement. We are constantly reading about the importance of Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co (TSMC), hailed in Taiwan as the nation’s “silicon shield” protecting it from hostile foreign forces such as the Chinese Communist Party (CCP), and so crucial to the global supply chain for semiconductors that its loss would cost the global economy US$1
US President Donald Trump’s challenge to domestic American economic-political priorities, and abroad to the global balance of power, are not a threat to the security of Taiwan. Trump’s success can go far to contain the real threat — the Chinese Communist Party’s (CCP) surge to hegemony — while offering expanded defensive opportunities for Taiwan. In a stunning affirmation of the CCP policy of “forceful reunification,” an obscene euphemism for the invasion of Taiwan and the destruction of its democracy, on March 13, 2024, the People’s Liberation Army’s (PLA) used Chinese social media platforms to show the first-time linkage of three new
Sasha B. Chhabra’s column (“Michelle Yeoh should no longer be welcome,” March 26, page 8) lamented an Instagram post by renowned actress Michelle Yeoh (楊紫瓊) about her recent visit to “Taipei, China.” It is Chhabra’s opinion that, in response to parroting Beijing’s propaganda about the status of Taiwan, Yeoh should be banned from entering this nation and her films cut off from funding by government-backed agencies, as well as disqualified from competing in the Golden Horse Awards. She and other celebrities, he wrote, must be made to understand “that there are consequences for their actions if they become political pawns of
RSS