In order to fulfill the promises President Ma Ying-jeou (馬英九) made during the presidential election campaign, the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT)-dominated legislature hastily passed the National Pension Act (國民年金法) on the final day of the legislative session. Although this was a law that many had long wanted to see passed, it has also received a great deal of criticism.
Those opposing the law directed their concerns at the problems haunting farmers’ insurance and other financial difficulties the government is facing. While their dissatisfaction is understandable, real focus should be on the unfairness of the National Pension Act. Compared with the monthly pension payments to military officials, public servants and teachers, the payments under the National Pension Act and the Labor Insurance Annuity (勞保年金) scheme — which was passed the day before the National Pension Act — are a pittance.
At present, military personnel, public servants and teachers receive pensions once they reach the age of 50 and have served for 25 years. Retired elementary school teachers receive at least NT$50,000 per month, while principals receive up to NT$100,000. The situation is even more ridiculous with retired military personnel: A person who studied at the Chung Cheng Armed Forces Preparatory School or the ROC Military Academy after graduating from junior high school can receive between NT$60,000 and NT$70,000 when they turn 40. Military personnel and elementary school teachers pay no taxes. By the time they reach the age of 80 or 90, they will have received tens of millions of dollars. When they pass away, their spouses continue to receive half of the original monthly pension payments.
No other country has a pension system so generous with taxpayers’ money. In Germany, individuals have to work for 40 years and hand out 20 percent of their salary to fund their retirement. Only after they turn 65 will they be able to receive 70 percent to 80 percent of their salary as pension payments. Because of a declining birth rate and a rapid increase in the elderly population, two years ago the German government raised the retirement age to 67 to cope with massive pension costs.
Taiwan has a ludicrous system aimed at benefiting military personnel, public servants and teachers, who only make up a small minority of the population. The majority of Taiwanese have long had to use their own savings to finance their retirement. The National Pension Act means that non-civil service workers who have paid insurance fees for 40 years will be receiving less than NT$9,000 per month after they retire.
Monthly pensions for military personnel, public servants and teachers not only have an adverse impact on social justice, but are also likely to destroy the nation’s economy.
Not long ago, former civil service minister Chu Wu-hsien (朱武獻) admitted that the pension fund was NT$1.2 trillion (US$39.45 billion) in the red. Directorate General of Budget, Accounting and Statistics data showed that NT$210 billion was spent on retirement pensions for military personnel, public servants and teachers in 2004 — equivalent to the total amount of individual income tax collected that year. The problem with this system is that the amount spent on pensions will increase as life expectancy increases, which could topple Taiwan’s economy.
Ma should make revamping these pension plans one of his top priorities. This is also the best way for him to win votes from both the pan-blue and the pan-green camps.
Huang Jui-ming is an associate professor of law at Providence University.
TRANSLATED BY DREW CAMERON
Taiwan’s semiconductor industry gives it a strategic advantage, but that advantage would be threatened as the US seeks to end Taiwan’s monopoly in the industry and as China grows more assertive, analysts said at a security dialogue last week. While the semiconductor industry is Taiwan’s “silicon shield,” its dominance has been seen by some in the US as “a monopoly,” South Korea’s Sungkyunkwan University academic Kwon Seok-joon said at an event held by the Center for Strategic and International Studies. In addition, Taiwan lacks sufficient energy sources and is vulnerable to natural disasters and geopolitical threats from China, he said.
After reading the article by Hideki Nagayama [English version on same page] published in the Liberty Times (sister newspaper of the Taipei Times) on Wednesday, I decided to write this article in hopes of ever so slightly easing my depression. In August, I visited the National Museum of Ethnology in Osaka, Japan, to attend a seminar. While there, I had the chance to look at the museum’s collections. I felt extreme annoyance at seeing that the museum had classified Taiwanese indigenous peoples as part of China’s ethnic minorities. I kept thinking about how I could make this known, but after returning
What value does the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) hold in Taiwan? One might say that it is to defend — or at the very least, maintain — truly “blue” qualities. To be truly “blue” — without impurities, rejecting any “red” influence — is to uphold the ideology consistent with that on which the Republic of China (ROC) was established. The KMT would likely not object to this notion. However, if the current generation of KMT political elites do not understand what it means to be “blue” — or even light blue — their knowledge and bravery are far too lacking
Taipei’s population is estimated to drop below 2.5 million by the end of this month — the only city among the nation’s six special municipalities that has more people moving out than moving in this year. A city that is classified as a special municipality can have three deputy mayors if it has a population of more than 2.5 million people, Article 55 of the Local Government Act (地方制度法) states. To counter the capital’s shrinking population, Taipei Mayor Chiang Wan-an (蔣萬安) held a cross-departmental population policy committee meeting on Wednesday last week to discuss possible solutions. According to Taipei City Government data, Taipei’s