Tropical Storm Kalmaegi skirted the northern parts of Taiwan, but that was enough to wreak disaster in the center and south of the country, causing severe flooding, killing 18 and leaving seven others missing. The government has budgeted more than NT$140 billion (US$4.6 billion) for flood-control projects in the past few years, yet this latest disaster makes it abundantly clear that flood-control policies have failed abysmally.
The rainfall brought by Kalmaegi reached frightening proportions, taking forecasters by surprise with more than 1m of rain in central and southern parts of the country. But this should have been nothing new. Heavy rain has caused flooding nationwide time and time again. Could this situation have been avoided if weather forecasts had been accurate? Of course not, because the problem is that flood-control efforts have failed.
The government has spent a huge amount of time and money on flood prevention, including a large portion of a NT$500 billion investment plan launched by the former government. During his stint as premier, Frank Hsieh (謝長廷) proposed flood control legislation and an eight-year flood-control budget of NT$80 billion. The Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) ridiculed both the legislation and the budget, accusing Hsieh of wanting to use the funds to expand grassroots support and then saying a special budget was inappropriate. KMT lawmakers blocked the budget for more than a year. In the end, however, the budget was passed in January 2006, in its third reading, after being boosted to NT$116 billion.
However, not a single project was completed in the first year of the plan. Since the budget was passed, at least NT$70 billion to NT$80 billion has been spent on flood prevention, most of it in Yunlin, Chiayi and Nantou counties, the three hardest hit by Kalmaegi.
The government’s biggest misconception about flood prevention is that spending a bit of extra money on construction projects will prevent flooding, without any concept of waterway dredging and maintenance. Both the former government’s five-year, NT$80 billion plan and the present government’s plan to expand domestic demand are emergency proposals made on the spur of the moment for political considerations. Local governments and ministries pulled together a spending plan in a few days. Such plans are simply band-aids and do not take the overall situation into account.
Projects are subcontracted but work is not supervised. Inferior work and inadequate construction plans set the stage for future disasters. The rains brought by Kalmaegi caused so much damage because many canals and ditches were blocked while uncontrolled construction had destroyed many waterways. The lack of properly trained and equipped rescue personnel also contributed to the disaster. Improving such shortcomings must be a part of the government’s flood-control planning.
Kalmaegi was a warning that flood prevention requires more than money; it takes commitment and time. Contracting out construction projects may be an effective means to win voter support, but once a flood disaster hits, that support, together with public trust, will all but collapse.
US$18.278 billion is a simple dollar figure; one that’s illustrative of the first Trump administration’s defense commitment to Taiwan. But what does Donald Trump care for money? During President Trump’s first term, the US defense department approved gross sales of “defense articles and services” to Taiwan of over US$18 billion. In September, the US-Taiwan Business Council compared Trump’s figure to the other four presidential administrations since 1993: President Clinton approved a total of US$8.702 billion from 1993 through 2000. President George W. Bush approved US$15.614 billion in eight years. This total would have been significantly greater had Taiwan’s Kuomintang-controlled Legislative Yuan been cooperative. During
Former president Ma Ying-jeou (馬英九) in recent days was the focus of the media due to his role in arranging a Chinese “student” group to visit Taiwan. While his team defends the visit as friendly, civilized and apolitical, the general impression is that it was a political stunt orchestrated as part of Chinese Communist Party (CCP) propaganda, as its members were mainly young communists or university graduates who speak of a future of a unified country. While Ma lived in Taiwan almost his entire life — except during his early childhood in Hong Kong and student years in the US —
Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) lawmakers on Monday unilaterally passed a preliminary review of proposed amendments to the Public Officers Election and Recall Act (公職人員選罷法) in just one minute, while Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) legislators, government officials and the media were locked out. The hasty and discourteous move — the doors of the Internal Administration Committee chamber were locked and sealed with plastic wrap before the preliminary review meeting began — was a great setback for Taiwan’s democracy. Without any legislative discussion or public witnesses, KMT Legislator Hsu Hsin-ying (徐欣瑩), the committee’s convener, began the meeting at 9am and announced passage of the
In response to a failure to understand the “good intentions” behind the use of the term “motherland,” a professor from China’s Fudan University recklessly claimed that Taiwan used to be a colony, so all it needs is a “good beating.” Such logic is risible. The Central Plains people in China were once colonized by the Mongolians, the Manchus and other foreign peoples — does that mean they also deserve a “good beating?” According to the professor, having been ruled by the Cheng Dynasty — named after its founder, Ming-loyalist Cheng Cheng-kung (鄭成功, also known as Koxinga) — as the Kingdom of Tungning,
RSS