When Australian Prime Minister Kevin Rudd took office in December, there was widespread speculation that his foreign and defense policies would favor loosening ties with the US and tilting toward China.
Commentators pointed to his major in Chinese history and language, further study of Chinese in Taiwan and service as a diplomat in Beijing. Chinese press and TV news were close to ecstatic that he had come to power.
However, Australian Defense Minister Joel Fitzgibbon asserted that such speculation showed “poor judgment.” He said his prime minister was “well-versed in Chinese politics” and saw his experience in China as an opportunity “to promote trust.” He insisted, however, “that should not be read as a pro-China tilt.”
Fitzgibbon met the leader of the US Pacific Command, Admiral Timothy Keating, and visited Australian ships at Pearl Harbor for the biennial maritime Rim of the Pacific or RimPac exercise. He is scheduled to arrive in Washington today to meet with US Vice President Dick Cheney, US Secretary of Defense Robert Gates and US Secretary of State Condoleezza Rice.
Fitzgibbon said his ministry was drafting a new white paper on defense that would stress Australia’s commitment to its US alliance. Australia’s reliance on the US for security “certainly hasn’t changed” with the new government, he said.
He applauded a budding concept at the Pacific Command, which holds that the US need not take the lead in every contingency in Asia and the Pacific. Rather, others should be encouraged to lead while the US takes a supporting role. US officers call it “leading from the middle,” “leading from within,” or “leading from behind.”
Despite its relatively small population of 22 million, Australia has been integrated into the US security posture in Asia because of its strategic location. A senior US officer said: “If they are there, we don’t have to be there.”
Fitzgibbon said Australia hoped to improve the multilateral security architecture in Southeast Asia and that the Rudd government wanted to see all nations within the region or with interests there included. Some past proposals, notably those from former Malaysian prime minister Mahathir Mohamad, have sought to exclude the US.
Fitzgibbon said he hoped to widen the current focus on economic issues to include strategic foreign and security issues.
He said he was encouraged by Japan’s increasing engagement in security issues, and met Japanese Defense Minister Shigeru Ishiba at a conference of defense ministers in Singapore in May. Fitzgibbon said, however, he saw no need to formalize the emerging security partnership between Australia, Japan and the US.
Richard Halloran is a writer based in Hawaii.
Trying to force a partnership between Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co (TSMC) and Intel Corp would be a wildly complex ordeal. Already, the reported request from the Trump administration for TSMC to take a controlling stake in Intel’s US factories is facing valid questions about feasibility from all sides. Washington would likely not support a foreign company operating Intel’s domestic factories, Reuters reported — just look at how that is going over in the steel sector. Meanwhile, many in Taiwan are concerned about the company being forced to transfer its bleeding-edge tech capabilities and give up its strategic advantage. This is especially
US President Donald Trump’s second administration has gotten off to a fast start with a blizzard of initiatives focused on domestic commitments made during his campaign. His tariff-based approach to re-ordering global trade in a manner more favorable to the United States appears to be in its infancy, but the significant scale and scope are undeniable. That said, while China looms largest on the list of national security challenges, to date we have heard little from the administration, bar the 10 percent tariffs directed at China, on specific priorities vis-a-vis China. The Congressional hearings for President Trump’s cabinet have, so far,
The US Department of State has removed the phrase “we do not support Taiwan independence” in its updated Taiwan-US relations fact sheet, which instead iterates that “we expect cross-strait differences to be resolved by peaceful means, free from coercion, in a manner acceptable to the people on both sides of the Strait.” This shows a tougher stance rejecting China’s false claims of sovereignty over Taiwan. Since switching formal diplomatic recognition from the Republic of China to the People’s Republic of China in 1979, the US government has continually indicated that it “does not support Taiwan independence.” The phrase was removed in 2022
US President Donald Trump, US Secretary of State Marco Rubio and US Secretary of Defense Pete Hegseth have each given their thoughts on Russia’s war with Ukraine. There are a few proponents of US skepticism in Taiwan taking advantage of developments to write articles claiming that the US would arbitrarily abandon Ukraine. The reality is that when one understands Trump’s negotiating habits, one sees that he brings up all variables of a situation prior to discussion, using broad negotiations to take charge. As for his ultimate goals and the aces up his sleeve, he wants to keep things vague for
RSS