If US President George W. Bush or one of the two presidential candidates, senators John McCain and Barack Obama, suddenly had the bizarre idea to build a freeway straight through Yellowstone National Park, most Americans would probably be upset and might even decide not to vote in the presidential election, as this would no longer be a matter for the residents of Wyoming alone. Yellowstone National Park is a great cultural asset that belongs to all Americans, if not the entire world. It is the pride of Americans in the same way as Taroko Gorge National Park is the pride of Taiwanese.
No one will — nor should they — deny that the residents of Hualien have the right to a safe road to and from their home town. However, as the Suhua Freeway (蘇花高) would pass through the Taroko Gorge National Park and 16 other sensitive regions and ecological conservation areas, the matter is no longer an issue for residents of Hualien alone, but rather something that concerns every Taiwanese.
In particular, the 921 Earthquake of Sept. 21, 1999, not only took many lives, it also caused a big shift in the tectonic plate under central Taiwan. Despite this, the Ministry of Transportation and Communications — the agency in charge of developing the freeway — submitted its report on the environmental impact of the freeway to the Environmental Protection Administration within two weeks of the earthquake.
The only explanation for this rush was that the ministry wanted to announce the construction of the freeway ahead of the presidential election in February 2000.
It defies the imagination that such a major development project would be passed after only a few task group meetings over a three-month period were held. Furthermore, the issue that should have been given the most attention — whether the 921 Earthquake caused a tectonic shift under the Hualien-Taitung region — was completely ignored. To this day, the ministry has yet to provide a scientific report on the situation.
The reason behind the constant dispute over the construction of the freeway is that the decision-making process has been flawed ever since the initial development policy was formed. The government has also failed to understand the need to explain to the public what risks the project might entail in terms of environmental protection and human security in the wake of the earthquake.
A very good example of the importance of having a sound communication strategy has been provided by the political crisis that erupted in South Korea as a result of President Lee Myung-bak’s inability to clearly explain his policy on US beef imports.
Winston Dang is a former Environmental Protection Administration minister.
Translated by Perry Svensson
Concerns that the US might abandon Taiwan are often overstated. While US President Donald Trump’s handling of Ukraine raised unease in Taiwan, it is crucial to recognize that Taiwan is not Ukraine. Under Trump, the US views Ukraine largely as a European problem, whereas the Indo-Pacific region remains its primary geopolitical focus. Taipei holds immense strategic value for Washington and is unlikely to be treated as a bargaining chip in US-China relations. Trump’s vision of “making America great again” would be directly undermined by any move to abandon Taiwan. Despite the rhetoric of “America First,” the Trump administration understands the necessity of
US President Donald Trump’s challenge to domestic American economic-political priorities, and abroad to the global balance of power, are not a threat to the security of Taiwan. Trump’s success can go far to contain the real threat — the Chinese Communist Party’s (CCP) surge to hegemony — while offering expanded defensive opportunities for Taiwan. In a stunning affirmation of the CCP policy of “forceful reunification,” an obscene euphemism for the invasion of Taiwan and the destruction of its democracy, on March 13, 2024, the People’s Liberation Army’s (PLA) used Chinese social media platforms to show the first-time linkage of three new
If you had a vision of the future where China did not dominate the global car industry, you can kiss those dreams goodbye. That is because US President Donald Trump’s promised 25 percent tariff on auto imports takes an ax to the only bits of the emerging electric vehicle (EV) supply chain that are not already dominated by Beijing. The biggest losers when the levies take effect this week would be Japan and South Korea. They account for one-third of the cars imported into the US, and as much as two-thirds of those imported from outside North America. (Mexico and Canada, while
I have heard people equate the government’s stance on resisting forced unification with China or the conditional reinstatement of the military court system with the rise of the Nazis before World War II. The comparison is absurd. There is no meaningful parallel between the government and Nazi Germany, nor does such a mindset exist within the general public in Taiwan. It is important to remember that the German public bore some responsibility for the horrors of the Holocaust. Post-World War II Germany’s transitional justice efforts were rooted in a national reckoning and introspection. Many Jews were sent to concentration camps not
RSS