Sultan al-Mazeen recently stopped at a gas station to fill up his SUV, paying US$0.45 a gallon (US$0.12 per liter) — a price Americans could only dream of as they pay nearly 10 times that at the pump.
But cheap gas and the record wealth pouring into Saudi Arabia’s coffers from high oil prices are little relief for al-Mazeen. The 36-year-old Saudi technician and many other Saudis say they’re only feeling poorer amid the oil boom because of inflation that has hit 30-year highs in the kingdom.
“I tell the Americans, don’t feel envious because gas is cheaper here,” said al-Mazeen. “We’re worse off than before.”
While Saudis don’t feel the pain at the pump, they feel it everywhere else, paying more at grocery stores and restaurants and for rent and construction material. While the country is getting richer selling oil at prices that climbed to a record US$145 last week, inflation has reached almost 11 percent, breaking double-digits for the first time since the late 1970s.
“Gas prices are low here, so what?” said Muhammad Abdullah, a 60-year-old retiree. “What can I do with gas? Drink it? Take it with me to the supermarket?”
Al-Mazeen says his monthly grocery bill has doubled — to US$215 — compared with last year, when oil was at around US$70 a barrel. During that time period, the price of rice has doubled to about US$0.72 cents a pound (0.45kg), and a pound of meat has gone up more than a third to about US$4.
Moreover, Saudis are grappling with unemployment — estimated at 30 percent among youths aged 16 to 26 — and a stock market that is down 10 percent since the beginning of the year.
Many Saudis are realizing that this oil boom will not have the same impact as the one in the 1970, which raised Saudis from rags to riches. This time, the wealth isn’t trickling down as fast or in the same quantities.
One reason is the kingdom’s growing population, says John Sfakianakis, chief economist at the Saudi British Bank (SABB). In the 1970s, the population of Saudi Arabia was 9.5 million. Today, it’s 27.6 million, including 22 million Saudi citizens.
That means the state, which controls nearly all oil income, has to spread the wealth among more people. Besides the country’s generous welfare system of free education and other benefits for citizens, the public sector employs some 2 million people, and 65 percent of the budget goes to salaries.
“The state, yes, is wealthier, but the state has close to three times the amount of people it has to cater for,” said Sfakianakis. “Even if Saudi Arabia had lower inflation, the country and the needs of the country are bigger than what they used to be.”
So the government has less room to raise wages to help people deal with higher prices. The United Arab Emirates recently hiked public sector wages by 70 percent — but if the Saudis did they same, they would have been hit by deficits, Sfakianakis added.
Contrary to their image in the West, Saudis are far from the wealthiest people of the Gulf, where many countries have much smaller populations and so can spread the riches faster. The kingdom’s per capita income is US$20,700 — compared to Qatar, which has a population of around a half million citizens and a per capita income of US$67,000.
In a recent interview with Kuwait’s Al-Siyassah newspaper, King Abdullah said “officials have suitable solutions” and plans to fight inflation.
“The government can use its money to offset the soaring prices of basic commodities. The kingdom will also use its financial reserves to combat inflation and bring everything back to normal,” the king was quoted as saying, without elaborating.
Economists say the main source of inflation is higher domestic demand for apartments, office space and food — at a time when world prices for food and raw materials is rising. A statement issued by the Economy and Planning Ministry on Saturday said that the rental index, which includes rents, fuel and water, has soared 18.5 percent while food and beverage costs have increased by 15.1 percent.
Saudi inflation is also exacerbated by the weak dollar, because the riyal is pegged to the US currency, increasing the cost of imports — and the kingdom imports most of its essential goods.
The influx of oil money itself into the economy also is a factor, but it is not as major a cause of inflation as the other issues, said Sfakianakis and other economists.
In a sign that inflation will not dissipate any time soon, the Saudi Cabinet decided on March 31 to reduce customs duties on 180 major foodstuffs, consumer goods and construction materials for at least three years, according to a report Sfakianakis wrote for SABB.
Still, the kingdom is set to make a large budget surplus because of high oil prices this year. Oil export revenue is expected to reach US$260 billion this year, according to a report last month by Jadwa Investment, a private Saudi firm. This compares with an average of just US$43 billion per year throughout the 1990s, the report said. It forecast that the budget surplus will be US$69 billion this year compared to US$47.6 billion last year.
But Saudi Arabia puts much of its oil income into investments and assets abroad, in part as a hedge in case oil prices drop in the future, squeezing the budget.
Sheik Abdul-Aziz al Sheikh, the kingdom’s grand mufti and top religious authority, has urged the government to fix prices on essential commodities.
“Every effort should be made to contain rising prices of goods all over the kingdom,” the mufti said during a sermon in Riyadh in February, the Arab News daily reported.
Taiwan’s victory in the World Baseball Softball Confederation Premier12 championship is an historic achievement. Yet once again this achievement is marred by the indignity of the imposed moniker “Chinese Taipei.” The absurdity is compounded by the fact that none of the players are even from Taipei, and some, such as Paiwan catcher Giljegiljaw Kungkuan, are not even ethnically Chinese. The issue garnered attention around the Paris Olympics, yet fell off the agenda as Olympic memories retreated. “Chinese Taipei” persists, and the baseball championship serves as a reminder that fighting “Chinese Taipei” must be a continuous campaign, not merely resurfacing around international
This month, the National Health Insurance (NHI) is to implement a major policy change by eliminating the suspension-and-resumption mechanism for Taiwanese residing abroad. With more than 210,000 Taiwanese living overseas — many with greater financial means than those in Taiwan — this reform, catalyzed by a 2022 Constitutional Court ruling, underscores the importance of fairness, sustainability and shared responsibility in one of the world’s most admired public healthcare systems. Beyond legal obligations, expatriates have a compelling moral duty to contribute, recognizing their stake in a system that embodies the principle of health as a human right. The ruling declared the prior
Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co (TSMC) appears to be encountering some culture shock and safety issues at its new fab in Arizona. On Nov. 7, Arizona state authorities cited TSMC for worker safety violations, fining the company US$16,131, after a man died in May. The Arizona Division of Occupational Safety and Health released its six-month investigation into the fatality and cited TSMC for failing to keep the workplace free from hazards likely to cause death or serious harm. At about the same time, the chip giant was also sued for alleged discriminatory hiring practices favoring Asians, prompting a flurry of debate on whether TSMC’s
Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) Legislator Weng Hsiao-ling (翁曉玲) has motioned to abolish the “Wu Sz-huai” (吳斯懷) clauses of the Act Governing Relations Between the People of the Taiwan Area and the Mainland Area (臺灣地區與大陸地區人民關係條例) — which forbid all Taiwanese who enter China from engaging in any activities detrimental to national security or interests. This motion led the Taiwan Statebuilding Party (TSP) to report her for infringing upon the National Security Act (國家安全法), which Weng called a lawless and undisciplined attempt to threaten a legislator. However, the true lawless and undisciplined person is Weng — the one standing in the enemy