The recent opening to China by President Ma Ying-jeou’s (馬英九) administration is generally described by the Western press as a positive development and hailed by the governments of the US and other nations as a step to reduce tension and a basis for longer-term stability in the Taiwan Strait.
However, one needs to look again at the actors and actions and see what is really happening. Even before Ma’s inauguration on May 20, his emissaries were speeding headlong toward China to lay the groundwork for these changes. In mid-April, then vice president-elect Vincent Siew (蕭萬長) attended the Boao Forum in Hainan, briefly met with Chinese President Hu Jintao (胡錦濤), but was otherwise treated like the provincial chief of one of China’s outlying provinces.
Then at the end of May, right after the inauguration, Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) Party Chairman Wu Po-hsiung (吳伯雄) led a delegation to Nanjing and Beijing, also met with Hu, but couldn’t bring himself to call Ma “President” and only referred to him as “Mr Ma.” He also didn’t dare to refer to Taiwan as the “Republic of China” (ROC), a curious about-face in view of the fact that within Taiwan, the KMT is now insisting on not referring to Taiwan as “Taiwan” but as the “ROC.”
The third event was the first round of talks between the two semi-official organizations representing the two countries — the Straits Exchange Foundation (SEF) for Taiwan and the Association for Relations across the Taiwan Strait (ARATS) for China. This led to the agreement to allow weekend charter flights and Chinese tourists starting last weekend.
While these developments seem innocuous and are presented as first steps in the direction of a general reduction of tension between the two sides, there are significant reasons for concern on a number of fronts.
First, the Ma administration did not attempt to achieve any consensus in Taiwan before recklessly rushing ahead into its adventure with China. It did so without any consultations with either the DPP — which received some 37 percent of the votes in the legislative election and 41 percent of the votes in the presidential election — or with the Legislative Yuan itself. No wonder that in a recent interview with the Liberty Times, Legislative Speaker Wang Jin-pyng (王金平) cautioned that there were three things requiring attention. First, national sovereignty must be ensured. Second, national security must be protected, and third, the rights of the 23 million Taiwanese must be protected. He urged the Ma administration to submit a comprehensive proposal to the legislature. This hasn’t happened yet.
Second, the Ma administration has hitched itself inextricably to the goodwill of the Beijing regime. He has mentioned the reduction of the missile threat and more “international space” for Taiwan as desirable, but he has little leverage. If Beijing doesn’t deliver or only makes token moves, Ma has little room to maneuver and is dead in the water.
Third, Ma has zigzagged on the issue of arms sales from the US. There were earlier reports that right after the inauguration the Ma administration had urged the US to slow down the timing of the notifications of arms sales. Subsequent reports indicated that the Ma administration had not initiated a freeze in the sales. Be that as it may, the fact remains that from 2002 to last year, the KMT opposition did everything possible to sabotage the US-offered arms package by blocking even a discussion in the Legislative Yuan, thereby undermining Taiwan’s security.
Fourth, by allowing Taiwan to drift into China’s orbit and sphere of influence, the US risks losing an important friend and ally in the region. Taiwan’s strategic location astride the major sea lanes from Japan and Korea to Southeast Asia makes it an important asset in support of free shipping and free trade. The US needs to set clear markers and red lines that — if crossed — would represent a threat to US interests.
Fifth, by linking Taiwan’s economy so much closer to China’s, Ma has placed Taiwan at risk of being pulled down in the event of a severe downturn in the Chinese economy. The current near-recession in the US will undoubtedly have severe repercussions on China’s economy. The first indicators are already there — a 50 percent drop in the Shanghai stock market during the past half year and hundreds, if not thousands, of Taiwanese companies in places like Shenzhen folding or moving to other countries like Vietnam.
So, if Ma is wise, he would follow a more prudent approach, based on first developing an internal consensus in Taiwan on how to move ahead, consultations with the US and Japan on security and strategic boundary conditions, and diversifying Taiwan’s economic and political links with the international community.
Only if he works along these lines will he be able to negotiate from a position of strength. The present approach will only lead to Taiwan being pushed into a corner from which it will be very difficult to extract itself. The Taiwanese people who have worked so hard for democracy deserve better.
Gerrit van der Wees is editor of Taiwan Communique, a publication based in Washington.
In their recent op-ed “Trump Should Rein In Taiwan” in Foreign Policy magazine, Christopher Chivvis and Stephen Wertheim argued that the US should pressure President William Lai (賴清德) to “tone it down” to de-escalate tensions in the Taiwan Strait — as if Taiwan’s words are more of a threat to peace than Beijing’s actions. It is an old argument dressed up in new concern: that Washington must rein in Taipei to avoid war. However, this narrative gets it backward. Taiwan is not the problem; China is. Calls for a so-called “grand bargain” with Beijing — where the US pressures Taiwan into concessions
The term “assassin’s mace” originates from Chinese folklore, describing a concealed weapon used by a weaker hero to defeat a stronger adversary with an unexpected strike. In more general military parlance, the concept refers to an asymmetric capability that targets a critical vulnerability of an adversary. China has found its modern equivalent of the assassin’s mace with its high-altitude electromagnetic pulse (HEMP) weapons, which are nuclear warheads detonated at a high altitude, emitting intense electromagnetic radiation capable of disabling and destroying electronics. An assassin’s mace weapon possesses two essential characteristics: strategic surprise and the ability to neutralize a core dependency.
Chinese President and Chinese Communist Party (CCP) Chairman Xi Jinping (習近平) said in a politburo speech late last month that his party must protect the “bottom line” to prevent systemic threats. The tone of his address was grave, revealing deep anxieties about China’s current state of affairs. Essentially, what he worries most about is systemic threats to China’s normal development as a country. The US-China trade war has turned white hot: China’s export orders have plummeted, Chinese firms and enterprises are shutting up shop, and local debt risks are mounting daily, causing China’s economy to flag externally and hemorrhage internally. China’s
US President Donald Trump and Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) were born under the sign of Gemini. Geminis are known for their intelligence, creativity, adaptability and flexibility. It is unlikely, then, that the trade conflict between the US and China would escalate into a catastrophic collision. It is more probable that both sides would seek a way to de-escalate, paving the way for a Trump-Xi summit that allows the global economy some breathing room. Practically speaking, China and the US have vulnerabilities, and a prolonged trade war would be damaging for both. In the US, the electoral system means that public opinion
RSS