I used to believe that Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) legislators proposed pork barrel bills (“money-pit bills” 錢坑法案) before elections just to attract votes, but that they would change, especially after coming to power.
Now I have to admit that I was wrong.
The legislative elections are long past and the KMT is in power again, but some KMT lawmakers are still pushing for salary increases for key local government officials and dual retirement pensions for workers at state-run companies by categorizing them as civil servants.
Today, Taiwan’s economy is shaken by global inflation and the US subprime mortgage crisis. With all these threats to the economy, people argue whether the middle and lower classes should be given tax cuts or whether the government should go ahead with proposed plans to expand domestic demand.
People argue about these proposals because any such plan requires money. In the face of Taiwan’s financial difficulties, the KMT lawmakers’ proposals can only aggravate the situation.
This shows that the KMT has been incapable of integrating its policy suggestions across party, Cabinet and legislative caucus lines since coming to power. This is certainly related to President Ma Ying-jeou’s (馬英九) strategy of taking the back seat to the premier and his attempts to separate party and government.
If the president — who is directly authorized by the public — is stepping back, then the question is: Who has more power? When there’s no clear answer, the result is that everyone does what he thinks is best.
Given that legislators are not acting as part of the government and that the party has problems controlling its legislators, the legislators’ priority is simply to consolidate their own power base and support.
If the party gets involved, its responsibility for winning elections means that it is not clear on whether it should back the government or the lawmakers.
Moreover, the lack of policy integration is a result of not only Ma’s leadership, but also the nation’s chaotic constitutional system.
The predicament caused by the problematic constitutional and party systems in fact began during former president Chen Shui-bian’s (陳水扁) government and remains unresolved. Over the past eight years, Chen attempted to integrate party and government policy in various ways. But he completely failed because of the restrictions of the constitutional system.
Today, Ma says that obeying the Constitution of the Republic of China is more important than amending it. However, as he continues to insist on obeying a problematic Constitution like this, he will surely face even greater difficulties.
Apart from the constitutional system, another reason behind the KMT lawmakers’ actions may be the nature of the party itself.
Recently, Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) Chairwoman Tsai Ing-wen (蔡英文) requested DPP members to remain rational and not sing the demise of the new government, so that we could overcome all difficulties together. Clearly, she is trying to lay a new path in the confrontation between the ruling and opposition camps.
The problem is that although this new path must be developed in the long term if democracy in Taiwan is to further develop, KMT lawmakers only think of their individual power base and support and do not care about the government’s difficulties. No matter how much goodwill the DPP is sending out, it will be unable to save the KMT.
Lin Cho-shui is a former Democratic Progressive Party legislator.
Translated by Eddy Chang
It is employment pass renewal season in Singapore, and the new regime is dominating the conversation at after-work cocktails on Fridays. From September, overseas employees on a work visa would need to fulfill the city-state’s new points-based system, and earn a minimum salary threshold to stay in their jobs. While this mirrors what happens in other countries, it risks turning foreign companies away, and could tarnish the nation’s image as a global business hub. The program was announced in 2022 in a bid to promote fair hiring practices. Points are awarded for how a candidate’s salary compares with local peers, along
China last month enacted legislation to punish —including with the death penalty — “die-hard Taiwanese independence separatists.” The country’s leaders, including Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平), need to be reminded about what the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) has said and done in the past. They should think about whether those historical figures were also die-hard advocates of Taiwanese independence. The Taiwanese Communist Party was established in the Shanghai French Concession in April 1928, with a political charter that included the slogans “Long live the independence of the Taiwanese people” and “Establish a republic of Taiwan.” The CCP sent a representative, Peng
Japan and the Philippines on Monday signed a defense agreement that would facilitate joint drills between them. The pact was made “as both face an increasingly assertive China,” and is in line with Philippine President Ferdinand Marcos Jr’s “effort to forge security alliances to bolster the Philippine military’s limited ability to defend its territorial interests in the South China Sea,” The Associated Press (AP) said. The pact also comes on the heels of comments by former US deputy national security adviser Matt Pottinger, who said at a forum on Tuesday last week that China’s recent aggression toward the Philippines in
The Ministry of National Defense on Tuesday announced that the military would hold its annual Han Kuang exercises from July 22 to 26. Military officers said the exercises would feature unscripted war games, and a decentralized command and control structure. This year’s exercises underline the recent reforms in Taiwan’s military as it transitions from a top-down command structure to one where autonomy is pushed down to the front lines to improve decisionmaking and adaptability. Militaries around the world have been observing and studying Russia’s war in Ukraine. They have seen that the Ukrainian military has been much quicker to adapt to