A national leader should make stability rather than swiftness the government’s top priority, as any decision can be crucial to the public’s lives and livelihood or even the fate of the nation.
He or she must act with caution as there is no room for mistakes.
President Ma Ying-jeou’s (馬英九) government has stumbled repeatedly since it came to power more than a month ago. Yet surprisingly, it is speeding up its highly sensitive cross-strait measures by opening direct links with total disregard to national security. Will officials only stop and reflect if the public rebels against them?
After negotiations between the Straits Exchange Foundation (SEF) and China’s Association for Relations Across the Taiwan Strait (ARATS) last month, both sides agreed to open eight Taiwanese and five Chinese airports to direct charter flights. While this will partly fulfill Ma’s campaign promise, the government has rashly inked an agreement — without professional evaluation or adequate complementary measures — with a country that has shown no sign of renouncing the use of force against Taiwan. Not surprisingly, many observers have expressed concern.
As Ma said in his inaugural speech: “Power corrupts and absolute power corrupts absolutely.” Yet he is guilty of refusing to listen to sound but unpleasant advice. After the cross-strait talks, he immediately suggested that SEF Chairman Chiang Pin-kung (江丙坤) recommend shortening flight routes across the Taiwan Strait.
Dictatorial decisions like this are turning public discontent into a pressure cooker and if it boils over it could endanger Ma’s administration.
Regarding the selection of airports for direct flights, former president Chen Shui-bian’s (陳水扁) government designated Taiwan Taoyuan International Airport and Kaohsiung International Airport for direct flights. This not only emphasized the state-to-state nature of the flights, but also took into account that these airports were properly equipped and large enough to offer high-quality service.
In addition, these decisions were made with expert advice from the military and thus took national security into consideration. Yet Ma’s government is rashly adding six other airports.
In particular, adding Hualien and Taitung airports puts the nation in a dangerous situation. Hualien and Taitung are particularly significant for protecting combat capabilities in wartime and therefore should not be open to the flights.
Vice Minister of National Defense Lin Chen-yi (林鎮夷) said recently that China is the nation’s greatest enemy and that in terms of direct cross-strait flights, the Ministry of National Defense’s first priority is national security.
While the government plans to open eight airports to direct flights, the ministry has prioritized the preparations at Taoyuan and Kaohsiung international airports. The number of troops stationed at all of these airports must be increased and preparation work at the six other airports remains inadequate.
Minister of National Defense Chen Chao-min (陳肇敏), who has an air force background, is against opening Hualien and Taitung airports to cross-strait flights, but Ma’s decision outweighed their protests.
As for Ma’s proposal to shorten the cross-strait flight routes, the Civil Aeronautics Administration has negotiated the issue with the Air Force, but the military objects to any suggestion that would shorten the military’s advance warning for threats in the Taiwan Strait to less than 10 minutes as this is not enough time to intercept enemy planes.
The Air Force is even against flights from Fujian Province to Kinmen and Matsu, which indicates that these proposals are problematic.
Unfortunately, incompetent politicians have ignored expert opinion. No wonder some military leaders are saying in private that Taiwan might as well surrender right now.
On the one hand, Ma’s government has opened the doors to China by allowing direct flights to and from eight airports. On the other hand, reports say that Ma sent a representative to talk to Washington in the hope of halting the nation’s arms procurements to avoid upsetting Beijing at this juncture. After the Defense News broke this story, the Presidential Office offered an ambiguous and suspect response.
Ma has already asked the Ministry of Foreign Affairs to avoid references to Taiwanese sovereignty. By discontinuing arms purchases, he is effectively taking away national defense. Additionally, his direct flight plans will leave no part of air defense intact.
The question is whether Ma doesn’t already see himself as the “chief executive” of “Taiwan, China” and whether he, the president of the Republic of China, is guilty of treason only one month into his term.
Both the pro-Chinese character of the political and economic issues discussed in the recent cross-strait talks and the government’s alleged request that the US temporarily halt arms sales to Taiwan are serious matters that could constitute treason. The legislature should demand that the Presidential Office, the National Security Council, the Mainland Affairs Council and the SEF report to the legislature and explain the situation to the public. Legislators should otherwise refuse to review the budgets for agencies that are neglecting their responsibilities.
Such a muddleheaded and careless government should step down.
TRANSLATED BY EDDY CHANG AND ANGELA HONG
Why is Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) not a “happy camper” these days regarding Taiwan? Taiwanese have not become more “CCP friendly” in response to the Chinese Communist Party’s (CCP) use of spies and graft by the United Front Work Department, intimidation conducted by the People’s Liberation Army (PLA) and the Armed Police/Coast Guard, and endless subversive political warfare measures, including cyber-attacks, economic coercion, and diplomatic isolation. The percentage of Taiwanese that prefer the status quo or prefer moving towards independence continues to rise — 76 percent as of December last year. According to National Chengchi University (NCCU) polling, the Taiwanese
It would be absurd to claim to see a silver lining behind every US President Donald Trump cloud. Those clouds are too many, too dark and too dangerous. All the same, viewed from a domestic political perspective, there is a clear emerging UK upside to Trump’s efforts at crashing the post-Cold War order. It might even get a boost from Thursday’s Washington visit by British Prime Minister Keir Starmer. In July last year, when Starmer became prime minister, the Labour Party was rigidly on the defensive about Europe. Brexit was seen as an electorally unstable issue for a party whose priority
US President Donald Trump is systematically dismantling the network of multilateral institutions, organizations and agreements that have helped prevent a third world war for more than 70 years. Yet many governments are twisting themselves into knots trying to downplay his actions, insisting that things are not as they seem and that even if they are, confronting the menace in the White House simply is not an option. Disagreement must be carefully disguised to avoid provoking his wrath. For the British political establishment, the convenient excuse is the need to preserve the UK’s “special relationship” with the US. Following their White House
US President Donald Trump’s return to the White House has brought renewed scrutiny to the Taiwan-US semiconductor relationship with his claim that Taiwan “stole” the US chip business and threats of 100 percent tariffs on foreign-made processors. For Taiwanese and industry leaders, understanding those developments in their full context is crucial while maintaining a clear vision of Taiwan’s role in the global technology ecosystem. The assertion that Taiwan “stole” the US’ semiconductor industry fundamentally misunderstands the evolution of global technology manufacturing. Over the past four decades, Taiwan’s semiconductor industry, led by Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co (TSMC), has grown through legitimate means
RSS