A national leader should make stability rather than swiftness the government’s top priority, as any decision can be crucial to the public’s lives and livelihood or even the fate of the nation.
He or she must act with caution as there is no room for mistakes.
President Ma Ying-jeou’s (馬英九) government has stumbled repeatedly since it came to power more than a month ago. Yet surprisingly, it is speeding up its highly sensitive cross-strait measures by opening direct links with total disregard to national security. Will officials only stop and reflect if the public rebels against them?
After negotiations between the Straits Exchange Foundation (SEF) and China’s Association for Relations Across the Taiwan Strait (ARATS) last month, both sides agreed to open eight Taiwanese and five Chinese airports to direct charter flights. While this will partly fulfill Ma’s campaign promise, the government has rashly inked an agreement — without professional evaluation or adequate complementary measures — with a country that has shown no sign of renouncing the use of force against Taiwan. Not surprisingly, many observers have expressed concern.
As Ma said in his inaugural speech: “Power corrupts and absolute power corrupts absolutely.” Yet he is guilty of refusing to listen to sound but unpleasant advice. After the cross-strait talks, he immediately suggested that SEF Chairman Chiang Pin-kung (江丙坤) recommend shortening flight routes across the Taiwan Strait.
Dictatorial decisions like this are turning public discontent into a pressure cooker and if it boils over it could endanger Ma’s administration.
Regarding the selection of airports for direct flights, former president Chen Shui-bian’s (陳水扁) government designated Taiwan Taoyuan International Airport and Kaohsiung International Airport for direct flights. This not only emphasized the state-to-state nature of the flights, but also took into account that these airports were properly equipped and large enough to offer high-quality service.
In addition, these decisions were made with expert advice from the military and thus took national security into consideration. Yet Ma’s government is rashly adding six other airports.
In particular, adding Hualien and Taitung airports puts the nation in a dangerous situation. Hualien and Taitung are particularly significant for protecting combat capabilities in wartime and therefore should not be open to the flights.
Vice Minister of National Defense Lin Chen-yi (林鎮夷) said recently that China is the nation’s greatest enemy and that in terms of direct cross-strait flights, the Ministry of National Defense’s first priority is national security.
While the government plans to open eight airports to direct flights, the ministry has prioritized the preparations at Taoyuan and Kaohsiung international airports. The number of troops stationed at all of these airports must be increased and preparation work at the six other airports remains inadequate.
Minister of National Defense Chen Chao-min (陳肇敏), who has an air force background, is against opening Hualien and Taitung airports to cross-strait flights, but Ma’s decision outweighed their protests.
As for Ma’s proposal to shorten the cross-strait flight routes, the Civil Aeronautics Administration has negotiated the issue with the Air Force, but the military objects to any suggestion that would shorten the military’s advance warning for threats in the Taiwan Strait to less than 10 minutes as this is not enough time to intercept enemy planes.
The Air Force is even against flights from Fujian Province to Kinmen and Matsu, which indicates that these proposals are problematic.
Unfortunately, incompetent politicians have ignored expert opinion. No wonder some military leaders are saying in private that Taiwan might as well surrender right now.
On the one hand, Ma’s government has opened the doors to China by allowing direct flights to and from eight airports. On the other hand, reports say that Ma sent a representative to talk to Washington in the hope of halting the nation’s arms procurements to avoid upsetting Beijing at this juncture. After the Defense News broke this story, the Presidential Office offered an ambiguous and suspect response.
Ma has already asked the Ministry of Foreign Affairs to avoid references to Taiwanese sovereignty. By discontinuing arms purchases, he is effectively taking away national defense. Additionally, his direct flight plans will leave no part of air defense intact.
The question is whether Ma doesn’t already see himself as the “chief executive” of “Taiwan, China” and whether he, the president of the Republic of China, is guilty of treason only one month into his term.
Both the pro-Chinese character of the political and economic issues discussed in the recent cross-strait talks and the government’s alleged request that the US temporarily halt arms sales to Taiwan are serious matters that could constitute treason. The legislature should demand that the Presidential Office, the National Security Council, the Mainland Affairs Council and the SEF report to the legislature and explain the situation to the public. Legislators should otherwise refuse to review the budgets for agencies that are neglecting their responsibilities.
Such a muddleheaded and careless government should step down.
TRANSLATED BY EDDY CHANG AND ANGELA HONG
Concerns that the US might abandon Taiwan are often overstated. While US President Donald Trump’s handling of Ukraine raised unease in Taiwan, it is crucial to recognize that Taiwan is not Ukraine. Under Trump, the US views Ukraine largely as a European problem, whereas the Indo-Pacific region remains its primary geopolitical focus. Taipei holds immense strategic value for Washington and is unlikely to be treated as a bargaining chip in US-China relations. Trump’s vision of “making America great again” would be directly undermined by any move to abandon Taiwan. Despite the rhetoric of “America First,” the Trump administration understands the necessity of
In an article published on this page on Tuesday, Kaohsiung-based journalist Julien Oeuillet wrote that “legions of people worldwide would care if a disaster occurred in South Korea or Japan, but the same people would not bat an eyelid if Taiwan disappeared.” That is quite a statement. We are constantly reading about the importance of Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co (TSMC), hailed in Taiwan as the nation’s “silicon shield” protecting it from hostile foreign forces such as the Chinese Communist Party (CCP), and so crucial to the global supply chain for semiconductors that its loss would cost the global economy US$1
US President Donald Trump’s challenge to domestic American economic-political priorities, and abroad to the global balance of power, are not a threat to the security of Taiwan. Trump’s success can go far to contain the real threat — the Chinese Communist Party’s (CCP) surge to hegemony — while offering expanded defensive opportunities for Taiwan. In a stunning affirmation of the CCP policy of “forceful reunification,” an obscene euphemism for the invasion of Taiwan and the destruction of its democracy, on March 13, 2024, the People’s Liberation Army’s (PLA) used Chinese social media platforms to show the first-time linkage of three new
Sasha B. Chhabra’s column (“Michelle Yeoh should no longer be welcome,” March 26, page 8) lamented an Instagram post by renowned actress Michelle Yeoh (楊紫瓊) about her recent visit to “Taipei, China.” It is Chhabra’s opinion that, in response to parroting Beijing’s propaganda about the status of Taiwan, Yeoh should be banned from entering this nation and her films cut off from funding by government-backed agencies, as well as disqualified from competing in the Golden Horse Awards. She and other celebrities, he wrote, must be made to understand “that there are consequences for their actions if they become political pawns of
RSS